Indian Spinal Injuries Centre, Institute of Rehabilitation Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Department of Research, Indian Spinal Injuries Centre, New Delhi, India.
J Sport Rehabil. 2023 Aug 29;32(8):926-931. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2023-0005. Print 2023 Nov 1.
Clinical assessment of scapular motion is obscured by a lack of clinically accessible and feasible angular measurement tools. This study evaluates the reliability and validity of the smartphone "Clinometer" app in measuring scapular upward rotation (UR) and anteroposterior tilt.
Psychometric analysis.
We recruited 57 participants-10 with and 47 without shoulder pain. Two physical therapists consecutively measured both scapular movements using the Clinometer app at the arm by the side (rest), 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120° of humeral elevation in the scapular plane; one therapist measured again after 2 days. For evaluating concurrent validity, we compared the Clinometer scores with those measured using an electromagnetic motion capture system in 10 healthy participants. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) with standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable difference at 90% confidence intervals (MDD90) were calculated. Concurrent validity was evaluated using repeated-measures analysis of variance followed by post hoc testing with Tukey-Kramer test (P < .05).
We observed good intrarater reliability (ICC: UR = .76-.85, tilt = .69-.9; SEM: 2.2°-3.5°; MDD90: ∼5°-8°) and moderate to good interrater reliability (ICC: UR = .66-.78, tilt = .66-.76; SEM: 3.6°-8°; MDD90: ∼9°-18°) for both rotations. The Clinometer scores for UR were comparable to electromagnetic motion capture system at all angles except 90° (difference ∼8°); for scapular tilt, the scores were comparable only at rest and 30° elevation.
The Clinometer app is reliable and valid for measuring scapular UR throughout and for scapular tilt at lower humeral elevation angles. The MDD90 values for scapular rotations computed in this study can be helpful in rehabilitation planning and future research.
肩胛骨运动的临床评估受到缺乏临床可及和可行的角度测量工具的限制。本研究评估了智能手机“Clinometer”应用程序测量肩胛骨上旋(UR)和前后倾斜的可靠性和有效性。
心理测量分析。
我们招募了 57 名参与者,其中 10 名有肩痛,47 名没有肩痛。两名物理治疗师连续使用 Clinometer 应用程序在肩胛骨平面测量双侧肩胛骨运动,在手臂侧(休息)、30°、60°、90°和 120°肩关节抬高时进行测量;一位治疗师在 2 天后再次测量。为了评估同时效度,我们将 Clinometer 评分与 10 名健康参与者使用电磁运动捕捉系统测量的评分进行了比较。计算了组内相关系数(ICC)和测量误差(SEM)以及 90%置信区间的最小可检测差异(MDD90)。使用重复测量方差分析评估同时效度,然后使用 Tukey-Kramer 检验进行事后检验(P<.05)。
我们观察到良好的内部可靠性(ICC:UR =.76-.85,倾斜 =.69-.9;SEM:2.2°-3.5°;MDD90:∼5°-8°)和中等至良好的外部可靠性(ICC:UR =.66-.78,倾斜 =.66-.76;SEM:3.6°-8°;MDD90:∼9°-18°)。除 90°(差异约 8°)外,Clinometer 在上旋的所有角度上的评分与电磁运动捕捉系统相当;对于肩胛骨倾斜,只有在休息和 30°抬高时评分相当。
Clinometer 应用程序在测量整个肩胛骨 UR 以及在较低的肩关节抬高角度测量肩胛骨倾斜时是可靠和有效的。本研究计算的肩胛骨旋转的 MDD90 值在康复计划和未来研究中可能会有所帮助。