LaCava Anthony F, Fadugba Olajumoke O
Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Cleveland Clinic, 224 W. Exchange Street, Suite 380, Akron, OH, 44302, USA.
Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, & Critical Care Medicine, Section of Allergy & Immunology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2023 Aug 29;19(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s13223-023-00820-4.
While both the AAAAI/ACAAI and the EAACI/GALEN/EuroGuiDerm/APAAACI guidelines recommend starting cyclosporine for patients with chronic urticaria who have had an inadequate response to omalizumab, many clinicians are hesitant to initiate cyclosporine due to paucity of clinical data. The objective of this study was to report real-life clinical outcomes in adult patients with chronic urticaria who had an inadequate response to omalizumab and were switched from omalizumab to cyclosporine. Medical records of adult patients with chronic urticaria who had an inadequate response with omalizumab and were later treated with cyclosporine were reviewed retrospectively. Data pertaining to treatment method, clinical response, and adverse effects were recorded.
RESULTS/PRESENTATION OF CASES: Five patients with omalizumab-refractory chronic urticaria, three of whom also had angioedema and one with an inducible urticaria, were treated with low doses of oral cyclosporine (1-3 mg/kg/d). Four of five patients in this case series had complete resolution of symptoms with oral cyclosporine, while continuing other standard therapies. Systemic side effects occurred in three patients which prompted drug discontinuation in two patients.
Cyclosporine alone was effective in inducing urticaria control in adult patients with chronic urticaria who had an inadequate response to omalizumab, though the impact of cyclosporine was limited by reversible adverse effects. Adverse effects were associated with pre-existing medical conditions. As novel chronic urticaria therapies are being investigated, this experience highlights the importance of uncovering chronic urticaria subtypes which tend to respond to cyclosporine, while providing alternative treatments with better tolerability.
虽然美国过敏、哮喘与免疫学会(AAAAI)/美国过敏、哮喘与免疫学会(ACAAI)以及欧洲变态反应与临床免疫学会(EAACI)/盖伦组织(GALEN)/欧洲皮肤病学指南(EuroGuiDerm)/亚太过敏、哮喘与临床免疫学会(APAAACI)的指南均建议,对于对奥马珠单抗反应不佳的慢性荨麻疹患者开始使用环孢素,但由于临床数据匮乏,许多临床医生对启动环孢素治疗犹豫不决。本研究的目的是报告对奥马珠单抗反应不佳且从奥马珠单抗转换为环孢素治疗的成年慢性荨麻疹患者的实际临床结果。对奥马珠单抗反应不佳且随后接受环孢素治疗的成年慢性荨麻疹患者的病历进行了回顾性分析。记录了与治疗方法、临床反应和不良反应相关的数据。
结果/病例展示:5例奥马珠单抗难治性慢性荨麻疹患者,其中3例还伴有血管性水肿,1例患有诱导性荨麻疹,接受低剂量口服环孢素(1 - 3毫克/千克/天)治疗。该病例系列中的5例患者中有4例在继续其他标准治疗的同时,口服环孢素后症状完全缓解。3例患者出现全身副作用,其中2例因此停药。
单独使用环孢素对奥马珠单抗反应不佳的成年慢性荨麻疹患者有效控制荨麻疹,尽管环孢素的作用受到可逆性不良反应的限制。不良反应与既往存在的疾病有关。随着新型慢性荨麻疹治疗方法的研究,这一经验凸显了发现对环孢素敏感的慢性荨麻疹亚型的重要性,同时提供耐受性更好的替代治疗方法。