• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

氯吡格雷早期不依从增加急性冠状动脉综合征患者的缺血风险:一项荟萃分析。

The Increased Ischemic Risk During the Early Period After Clopidogrel Noncompliance in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

National Key Laboratory of Frigid Zone Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China.

Department of Internal Medicine, Chinese PLA No. 31694 Army Health Company, Benxi, China.

出版信息

Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2023 Jan-Dec;29:10760296231196477. doi: 10.1177/10760296231196477.

DOI:10.1177/10760296231196477
PMID:37644847
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10469223/
Abstract

Although dual antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is highly recommended by current guidelines, P2Y inhibitor non-adherence often occurs and devastates prognosis. To evaluate whether the ischemic risk during the early period of clopidogrel noncompliance was increased among ACS patients, a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted to identify studies reporting early ischemic risk after clopidogrel noncompliance in ACS patients. The primary endpoint was a composite of death or myocardial infarction (MI). Effect sizes were synthesized in patients with or without revascularization. A total of 7 observational studies focusing on clopidogrel noncompliance were included in this meta-analysis, whereas no studies involving ticagrelor or prasugrel were retrieved. A significantly increased risk of death or MI 0 to 90 days after clopidogrel noncompliance was found compared with that during 90 to 180 or 90 to 360 days regardless of revascularization (incidence rate ratio [IRR]: 2.01, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.62-2.49,  < .001,  = 9%) or not (IRR: 1.61, 95% CI: 1.05-2.48,  < .001,  = 74%). Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention had a higher risk of death or MI 0 to 90 days after clopidogrel noncompliance compared with 90-180 or 90-360 days irrespective of drug-eluting stent or bare metal stent implantation ( < .05 for both). The early ischemic risk after clopidogrel noncompliance is significantly higher than the late risk in ACS patients. Antiplatelet noncompliance remains a serious concern.

摘要

尽管目前的指南强烈推荐急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者进行双联抗血小板治疗作为二级预防,但 P2Y 抑制剂的不依从现象经常发生,并严重影响预后。为了评估 ACS 患者氯吡格雷不依从期间早期缺血风险是否增加,我们全面检索了 PubMed、Embase 和 Web of Science,以确定报告 ACS 患者氯吡格雷不依从后早期缺血风险的研究。主要终点是死亡或心肌梗死(MI)的复合终点。在接受或未接受血运重建的患者中,评估了效果大小。本荟萃分析共纳入了 7 项关于氯吡格雷不依从的观察性研究,但未检索到涉及替格瑞洛或普拉格雷的研究。与 90-180 天或 90-360 天相比,无论是否进行血运重建(发生率比 [IRR]:2.01,95%置信区间 [CI]:1.62-2.49, < .001, = 9%),氯吡格雷不依从后 0-90 天内发生死亡或 MI 的风险显著增加(IRR:1.61,95% CI:1.05-2.48, < .001, = 74%)。接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者与 90-180 天或 90-360 天相比,氯吡格雷不依从后 0-90 天内发生死亡或 MI 的风险更高,无论是否植入药物洗脱支架或裸金属支架(两者均 < .05)。ACS 患者氯吡格雷不依从后的早期缺血风险明显高于晚期风险。抗血小板不依从仍然是一个严重的问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/086d/10469223/fe01670fc7b6/10.1177_10760296231196477-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/086d/10469223/040fc12353ca/10.1177_10760296231196477-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/086d/10469223/3bf24f3bb139/10.1177_10760296231196477-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/086d/10469223/fe01670fc7b6/10.1177_10760296231196477-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/086d/10469223/040fc12353ca/10.1177_10760296231196477-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/086d/10469223/3bf24f3bb139/10.1177_10760296231196477-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/086d/10469223/fe01670fc7b6/10.1177_10760296231196477-fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
The Increased Ischemic Risk During the Early Period After Clopidogrel Noncompliance in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis.氯吡格雷早期不依从增加急性冠状动脉综合征患者的缺血风险:一项荟萃分析。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2023 Jan-Dec;29:10760296231196477. doi: 10.1177/10760296231196477.
2
Comparative effects of guided vs. potent P2Y12 inhibitor therapy in acute coronary syndrome: a network meta-analysis of 61 898 patients from 15 randomized trials.比较指导下与强效 P2Y12 抑制剂治疗急性冠脉综合征的效果:来自 15 项随机试验的 61898 例患者的网络荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J. 2022 Mar 7;43(10):959-967. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab836.
3
Risk of major adverse cardiovascular events of loss-of-function genotype guided prasugrel/ticagrelor vs clopidogrel therapy for acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis.指导普拉格雷/替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷治疗行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者的功能丧失基因型与主要不良心血管事件风险:一项荟萃分析。
Platelets. 2021 Jul 4;32(5):591-600. doi: 10.1080/09537104.2020.1792871. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
4
Contemporary antiplatelet treatment in acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: 1-year outcomes from the GReek AntiPlatElet (GRAPE) Registry.急性冠状动脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的当代抗血小板治疗:来自希腊抗血小板(GRAPE)注册研究的 1 年结果。
J Thromb Haemost. 2016 Jun;14(6):1146-54. doi: 10.1111/jth.13316. Epub 2016 May 4.
5
Effect of Genotype-Guided Oral P2Y12 Inhibitor Selection After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.基因指导下经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后口服 P2Y12 抑制剂选择的效果:随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2022 Aug;41:115-121. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2022.01.005. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
6
Did Prasugrel and Ticagrelor Offer the Same Benefit in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes after Percutaneous Coronary Interventions Compared to Clopidogrel? Insights from Randomized Clinical Trials, Registries and Meta-analysis.普拉格雷和替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷相比,在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中提供相同获益吗?来自随机临床试验、登记和荟萃分析的见解。
Curr Pharm Des. 2018;24(4):465-477. doi: 10.2174/1381612824666180108121834.
7
1-Year Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Primary Angioplasty for Myocardial Infarction Treated With Prasugrel Versus Ticagrelor.接受普拉格雷或替格瑞洛治疗的心肌梗死患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 1 年结局。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Jan 30;71(4):371-381. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.11.008. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
8
Comparison of P2Y12 Inhibitors in Acute Coronary Syndromes in the Australian Population.澳大利亚人群中急性冠脉综合征的 P2Y12 抑制剂比较。
Heart Lung Circ. 2022 Aug;31(8):1085-1092. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2022.03.007. Epub 2022 May 17.
9
Prescription Patterns of Clopidogrel, Prasugrel, and Ticagrelor After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Stent Implantation (from the NCDR PINNACLE Registry).经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(支架植入术)后氯吡格雷、普拉格雷和替格瑞洛的处方模式(来自 NCDR PINNACLE 注册研究)。
Am J Cardiol. 2019 Dec 15;124(12):1807-1812. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.09.003. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
10
Safety and Efficacy of Triple Therapy With Ticagrelor or Prasugrel Versus Clopidogrel After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.替格瑞洛或普拉格雷三联疗法与氯吡格雷用于 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的安全性和疗效。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Nov;26(6):625-629. doi: 10.1177/10742484211031436. Epub 2021 Jul 8.

本文引用的文献

1
1-Month Dual-Antiplatelet Therapy Followed by Aspirin Monotherapy After Polymer-Free Drug-Coated Stent Implantation: One-Month DAPT Trial.聚合物涂层药物洗脱支架置入后 1 个月双联抗血小板治疗联合阿司匹林单药治疗:1 个月 DAPT 试验
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Aug 23;14(16):1801-1811. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.06.003. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
2
P2Y12 inhibitors in acute coronary syndrome patients with renal dysfunction: an analysis from the RENAMI and BleeMACS projects.肾功能不全的急性冠脉综合征患者中的 P2Y12 抑制剂:来自 RENAMI 和 BleeMACS 项目的分析。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2020 Jan 1;6(1):31-42. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvz048.
3
Duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent: systematic review and network meta-analysis.
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后药物洗脱支架双联抗血小板治疗的持续时间:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2019 Jun 28;365:l2222. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l2222.
4
Effect of 1-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Followed by Clopidogrel vs 12-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy on Cardiovascular and Bleeding Events in Patients Receiving PCI: The STOPDAPT-2 Randomized Clinical Trial.1 个月双联抗血小板治疗后序贯氯吡格雷与 12 个月双联抗血小板治疗对 PCI 患者心脑血管及出血事件的影响:STOPDAPT-2 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2019 Jun 25;321(24):2414-2427. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.8145.
5
Cessation of dual antiplatelet therapy and cardiovascular events following acute coronary syndrome.急性冠脉综合征后停止双联抗血小板治疗与心血管事件。
Heart. 2019 Jan;105(1):67-74. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-313148. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
6
Frequency, Reasons, and Impact of Premature Ticagrelor Discontinuation in Patients Undergoing Coronary Revascularization in Routine Clinical Practice: Results From the Bern Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Registry.在常规临床实践中接受冠状动脉血运重建的患者中过早停用替格瑞洛的频率、原因和影响:来自伯尔尼经皮冠状动脉介入治疗注册研究的结果。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 May;11(5):e006132. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.006132.
7
6-month versus 12-month or longer dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome (SMART-DATE): a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial.急性冠状动脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后 6 个月与 12 个月或更长时间双联抗血小板治疗(SMART-DATE):一项随机、开放标签、非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2018 Mar 31;391(10127):1274-1284. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30493-8. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
8
2017 ESC focused update on dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collaboration with EACTS: The Task Force for dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS).2017年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)与欧洲心胸外科学会(EACTS)合作制定的冠状动脉疾病双联抗血小板治疗重点更新:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)和欧洲心胸外科学会(EACTS)冠状动脉疾病双联抗血小板治疗特别工作组。
Eur Heart J. 2018 Jan 14;39(3):213-260. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx419.
9
Characteristics and outcomes of medically managed patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: Insights from the multinational EPICOR Asia study.非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征药物治疗患者的特征与转归:来自多国EPICOR亚洲研究的见解
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Sep 15;243:15-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.04.059.
10
Derivation and validation of the predicting bleeding complications in patients undergoing stent implantation and subsequent dual antiplatelet therapy (PRECISE-DAPT) score: a pooled analysis of individual-patient datasets from clinical trials.经支架植入和随后双联抗血小板治疗(PRECISE-DAPT)的患者预测出血并发症的预测评分的推导和验证:来自临床试验的个体患者数据集的汇总分析。
Lancet. 2017 Mar 11;389(10073):1025-1034. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30397-5.