Babajanian Eric, Nielson Christopher, Zhang Chong, Shi Kevin, Presson Angela P, Park Albert H
Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America.
University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America.
Am J Otolaryngol. 2024 Jan-Feb;45(1):104024. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2023.104024. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
To evaluate the efficacy of tympanomastoidectomy versus parenteral antibiotic therapy for otorrhea as a result of chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM) without cholesteatoma in the pediatric population.
A retrospective review of 221 patients treated for otorrhea at a tertiary academic pediatric hospital was performed to evaluate the impact of tympanomastoidectomy versus parenteral antibiotic therapy on resolution of otorrhea. Inclusion criteria were age 0-18 years, prior treatment with otic and/or oral antibiotic, prior history of tympanostomy tube placement for recurrent otitis media, history of otorrhea, treatment with tympanomastoidectomy or parenteral antibiotic therapy, and follow-up of at least 1 month after intervention. Time to resolution was compared between the two modalities adjusting for age, bilateral ear disease status, and comorbidities using a Cox proportional hazard model.
Eighty-three ears from 58 children met the inclusion criteria. Ears that initially underwent tympanomastoidectomy had a significantly shorter time to resolution of symptoms (median time to resolution) 9 months (95 % confidence interval CI: 6.2-14.8) vs. 48.5 months (95 % lower CI 9.4, p = 0.006). On multivariate analysis, however, only bilateral ear disease status was independently associated with time to resolution of symptoms (hazard ratio 0.4, 95 % CI 0.2-0.9, p = 0.03). There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of treatment-related complications when comparing tympanomastoidectomy to parenteral antibiotic therapy (p = 0.37).
When adjusting for age, bilateral ear disease status, and comorbidities, there does not appear to be a significant difference in time to resolution of symptoms when comparing parenteral antibiotic therapy to tympanomastoidectomy. An informed discussion regarding risks and benefits of each approach should be employed when deciding on the next step in management for patients with CSOM who have failed more conservative therapies.
评估鼓室乳突切除术与非肠道抗生素治疗对儿科人群中无胆脂瘤的慢性化脓性中耳炎(CSOM)所致耳漏的疗效。
对一家三级学术儿科医院治疗耳漏的221例患者进行回顾性研究,以评估鼓室乳突切除术与非肠道抗生素治疗对耳漏消退的影响。纳入标准为年龄0至18岁、曾接受耳用和/或口服抗生素治疗、有因复发性中耳炎行鼓膜置管术的病史、有耳漏病史、接受鼓室乳突切除术或非肠道抗生素治疗以及干预后至少随访1个月。使用Cox比例风险模型,在调整年龄、双耳疾病状态和合并症的情况下,比较两种治疗方式的症状消退时间。
58名儿童的83只耳朵符合纳入标准。最初接受鼓室乳突切除术的耳朵症状消退时间显著更短(中位消退时间)9个月(95%置信区间CI:6.2至14.8),而另一组为48.5个月(95%下限CI 9.4,p = 0.006)。然而,多因素分析显示,只有双耳疾病状态与症状消退时间独立相关(风险比0.4,95%CI 0.2至0.9,p = 0.03)。比较鼓室乳突切除术与非肠道抗生素治疗时,治疗相关并发症发生率无统计学显著差异(p = 0.37)。
在调整年龄、双耳疾病状态和合并症后,比较非肠道抗生素治疗与鼓室乳突切除术时,症状消退时间似乎没有显著差异。对于保守治疗失败的CSOM患者,在决定下一步治疗方案时,应就是否采用每种方法的风险和益处进行充分讨论。