Suppr超能文献

细胞减灭术/腹腔热灌注化疗术后切口疝:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Incisional hernias post cytoreductive surgery/peritonectomy and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

School of Medicine, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.

Department of Surgery, St John of God Subiaco Hospital, Subiaco, WA, Australia.

出版信息

Hernia. 2023 Oct;27(5):1067-1083. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02859-z. Epub 2023 Aug 31.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) is often combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for the treatment of peritoneal tumour deposits. Considering CRS, the evidence relating the large incisions, local chemotherapy and abdominal wall trauma to incisional hernias (IH) has not been synthesized. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to examine the proportion of IH present in patients post CRS and the effect HIPEC had on these rates.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Registry of Trials were searched up to June 2023 to examine studies relating IH and CRS plus or minus HIPEC. The most up to date PRISMA guidelines were followed. Pertinent clinical information was synthesized in tabular form. A meta-analysis reporting the pooled proportions of IH post CRS plus or minus HIPEC, the odds of IH in HIPEC versus non-HIPEC CRS and the difference in follow-up time between groups was conducted.

RESULTS

Nine studies comprising 1416 patients were included. The pooled proportion of IH post CRS was 12% (95% confidence interval (CI) 8-16%) in HIPEC and 7% (95% CI 4-10%) in non-HIPEC patients and 11% (95% CI 7-14%) overall. Previously reported rates of IH in midline laparotomy range from 10 to 30%. The odds of IH in the HIPEC was 1.9 times higher compared to non-HIPEC cohorts however this was not statistically significant (odds ratio (OR) 1.9, 95% 0.7-5.2; p = 0.21). There was no significant difference in average follow-up times between HIPEC and non-HIPEC cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

IH post CRS plus or minus HIPEC were in the expected range for midline laparotomies. IH in patients receiving HIPEC may occur at a greater proportion than in non-HIPEC patients, however, there were too few studies in our meta-analysis to determine this with statistical significance.

摘要

目的

细胞减灭术(CRS)常与腹腔内热化疗(HIPEC)联合用于治疗腹膜肿瘤沉积。考虑到 CRS,大量切口、局部化疗和腹壁创伤与切口疝(IH)的关系的证据尚未被综合。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在检查 CRS 术后 IH 患者的比例以及 HIPEC 对这些比率的影响。

方法

检索了 PubMed、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 临床试验中心注册库,以检查与 IH 和 CRS 加或不加 HIPEC 相关的研究。遵循了最新的 PRISMA 指南。以表格形式综合了相关的临床信息。进行了荟萃分析,报告了 CRS 加或不加 HIPEC 后 IH 的汇总比例、HIPEC 与非 HIPEC CRS 中 IH 的比值以及组间随访时间差异。

结果

纳入了 9 项研究,共 1416 名患者。HIPEC 组 IH 术后的汇总比例为 12%(95%置信区间[CI] 8-16%),非 HIPEC 组为 7%(95% CI 4-10%),总体为 11%(95% CI 7-14%)。以前报道的中线剖腹术 IH 发生率在 10%至 30%之间。与非 HIPEC 队列相比,HIPEC 中 IH 的比值比为 1.9 倍,但无统计学意义(比值比[OR] 1.9,95% 0.7-5.2;p=0.21)。HIPEC 和非 HIPEC 队列的平均随访时间无显著差异。

结论

CRS 加或不加 HIPEC 术后 IH 处于中线剖腹术的预期范围。接受 HIPEC 的患者发生 IH 的比例可能高于非 HIPEC 患者,但我们的荟萃分析中研究太少,无法具有统计学意义地确定这一点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd50/10533625/535c454fe7aa/10029_2023_2859_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验