Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States.
Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States.
Radiother Oncol. 2023 Nov;188:109892. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109892. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
Clinically localized Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) has been associated with high rates of disease relapse. This study examines how primary tumor anatomic site drives patterns of care and outcomes in a large cohort treated in the contemporary era.
Patterns of care and associated outcomes were evaluated for clinically Stage I-II MCC patients treated at our institution with adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) to the primary site and/or regional nodal basin as a component of their curative intent therapy between 2014-2021.
Of 80 patients who met inclusion criteria, the primary tumor anatomic site was head and neck (HN) for 42 (53%) and non-head and neck (NHN) for 38 (47%). Primary tumor risk factors were similar between cohorts. Fewer patients with HN tumors had wide local excision (WLE; HN-81% vs. NHN-100% p < 0.01). Of those undergoing WLE, patients with HN tumors received higher dose adjuvant RT (>50 Gy: HN-70% vs. NHN-8%; p < 0.01). Patients with HN tumors were less likely to undergo sentinel lymph node biopsy (HN-62%vs. NHN-100%; p < 0.01) and more likely to have elective nodal RT (HN-48% vs. NHN-0%). Despite varying management strategies, there was no significant difference in local recurrence-free survival (3-yr LRFS HN-94% vs. NHN-94%; p = 0.97), nodal recurrence-free survival (3-yr NRFS HN-89% vs. NHN-85%; p = 0.71) or overall recurrence-free survival (3-yr RFS 73% HN vs. 80% NHN; p = 0.44).
Among patients with primary MCC who had RT as a component of their initial treatment strategy, anatomically-driven heterogeneous treatment approaches were associated with equally excellent locoregional disease control.
临床上局限性 Merkel 细胞癌(MCC)与疾病复发率高有关。本研究通过对在我们机构接受治疗的大型队列进行分析,以评估主要肿瘤解剖部位如何影响治疗模式和结局,这些患者在当代接受了以根治为目的的辅助放疗(RT),包括原发部位和/或区域淋巴结区。
我们评估了 2014 年至 2021 年间在我院接受辅助 RT 治疗的 I 期和 II 期 MCC 患者的治疗模式和相关结局,这些患者的主要肿瘤解剖部位为头颈部(HN)或非头颈部(NHN)。
符合纳入标准的 80 名患者中,42 名(53%)的原发肿瘤解剖部位为头颈部(HN),38 名(47%)为非头颈部(NHN)。两组患者的原发肿瘤危险因素相似。HN 肿瘤患者接受广泛局部切除术(WLE)的比例较低(HN-81% vs. NHN-100%,p<0.01)。接受 WLE 的患者中,HN 肿瘤患者接受的辅助 RT 剂量较高(>50Gy:HN-70% vs. NHN-8%,p<0.01)。HN 肿瘤患者接受前哨淋巴结活检的比例较低(HN-62% vs. NHN-100%,p<0.01),而接受选择性区域淋巴结 RT 的比例较高(HN-48% vs. NHN-0%)。尽管治疗策略不同,但局部无复发生存率(3 年 LRFS HN-94% vs. NHN-94%,p=0.97)、无区域淋巴结复发生存率(3 年 NRFS HN-89% vs. NHN-85%,p=0.71)和总无复发生存率(3 年 RFS HN-73% vs. NHN-80%,p=0.44)无显著差异。
在接受 RT 作为初始治疗策略一部分的 MCC 患者中,基于解剖部位的治疗方法存在显著差异,但局部区域疾病控制效果同样出色。