OBJECTIVE

Limited and conflicting data have been reported on the prognostic relevance of central blood pressure (CBP) compared with brachial blood pressure (BP) in the anticipation of hypertension-mediated organ damage and the majority of data derived using applanation tonometry with its known complexities. The objective of the present study was to investigate the diagnostic factors of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) with a special highlight on the utility of non-invasive oscillometric CBP measurement and derived hemodynamic indices compared to brachial BP as indicators of LVH.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included 300 hypertensive patients (mean age 55.3 years, 61.3% female, 51.7% obese) with a mean duration of hypertension was 5.8 years. They underwent measurement of brachial BP, using a mercury sphygmomanometer, and CBP, using a Mobil-O-Graph, alongside the determination of left ventricular (LV) mass by two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography. LVH and LV geometric patterns were defined by LV mass index/height 2.7 and relative wall thickness.

RESULTS

Bivariate then multivariate analysis showed that age, BMI, central systolic BP (SBP), and pulse wave velocity (PWV) were significant determinants of LVH and optimally controlled brachial BP was a significant negative determinant for LVH. Central SBP had an acceptable diagnostic performance to determine LVH in patients with hypertension (AUC = 0.722, 95% confidence interval: 0.618-0.824, SE = 0.21, P -value <0.001). Using one-way ANOVA, a comparison of means among age groups showed that the steady increase in central SBP and PWV with aging was greater among LVH patients than non-LVH patients.

CONCLUSION

Estimated central SBP using Mobil-O-Graph showed a significantly higher correlation to LVH than brachial SBP values. The consistent increase in central SBP and PWV with aging was greater among LVH patients than non-LVH patients.