Neuroscience, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA.
Mechanical Engineering, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA.
Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y). 2023 Sep 1;13:30. doi: 10.5334/tohm.740. eCollection 2023.
Electrical stimulation of muscles below motoneuron threshold has shown potential as a low-cost and minimally invasive treatment for Essential Tremor (ET). Prior studies have stimulated wrist flexor and extensor muscles synchronously with diverging results, calling for further investigation. Also, prior studies have only used a narrow range of stimulation parameters, so stimulation parameters have not been optimized. Our purpose was to further investigate synchronous submotor stimulation and identify the effect of stimulation frequency on tremor suppression.
We quantified the effect of brief, synchronous stimulation at 15 different frequencies from 10-150 Hz applied over wrist flexors and extensors on both tremor power and frequency in 20 ET patients. We compared tremor power and frequency from hand acceleration and sEMG between pre-, per-, and post-stimulation phases.
Our stimulation paradigm did not result in significant tremor suppression or tremor frequency changes at any tested stimulation frequency, showing no significant interaction between phase and stimulation frequency for tremor power measured by either hand acceleration (p = 0.69) or sEMG (p = 0.07). Additionally, the effect of phase interacting with stimulation frequency on tremor frequency was statistically insignificant for acceleration (p = 0.64) and sEMG (p = 0.37).
We conclude that brief synchronous submotor-threshold stimulation does not reduce tremor in ET patients, independent of stimulation frequency (from 10 to 150 Hz). Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that brief submotor-threshold stimulation suppresses tremor via reciprocal inhibition, which requires asynchronous stimulation. In contrast, it is hypothesized that synchronous stimulation might require longer stimulation durations to affect supraspinal tremor networks.
We studied the effects of synchronous submotor electrical stimulation over wrist flexor and extensor muscles on Essential Tremor. Our results indicate that suppressing tremor with brief synchronous stimulation is ineffective. Based on recently hypothesized mechanisms of peripheral tremor suppression, we hypothesize that asynchronous stimulation or long-duration synchronous stimulation are more effective approaches to peripheral tremor suppression.
低于运动神经元阈值的肌肉电刺激已显示出作为原发性震颤(ET)的低成本和微创治疗方法的潜力。先前的研究已经同步刺激腕屈肌和伸肌,但结果存在差异,因此需要进一步研究。此外,先前的研究仅使用了较窄的刺激参数范围,因此刺激参数尚未优化。我们的目的是进一步研究同步亚运动刺激,并确定刺激频率对震颤抑制的影响。
我们在 20 名 ET 患者中量化了在腕屈肌和伸肌上施加 15 种不同频率(10-150 Hz)的短暂同步刺激对震颤功率和频率的影响。我们比较了预刺激、刺激期和后刺激期手部加速度和 sEMG 之间的震颤功率和频率。
我们的刺激方案在任何测试的刺激频率下都没有导致明显的震颤抑制或震颤频率变化,表明在手加速度(p = 0.69)或 sEMG(p = 0.07)测量的震颤功率方面,相位与刺激频率之间没有显著的相互作用。此外,加速度(p = 0.64)和 sEMG(p = 0.37)的相位与刺激频率相互作用对震颤频率的影响在统计学上并不显著。
我们得出结论,短暂的同步亚运动阈下刺激不能降低 ET 患者的震颤,与刺激频率无关(从 10 到 150 Hz)。我们的结果与以下假设一致,即短暂的亚运动阈下刺激通过需要异步刺激的交互抑制来抑制震颤。相比之下,有人假设同步刺激可能需要更长的刺激持续时间来影响皮质震颤网络。
我们研究了腕屈肌和伸肌上的同步亚运动电刺激对原发性震颤的影响。我们的结果表明,使用短暂的同步刺激抑制震颤是无效的。基于最近提出的外周震颤抑制机制,我们假设异步刺激或长持续时间同步刺激是更有效的外周震颤抑制方法。