University of Lincoln, United Kingdom.
Med Hist. 2023 Jul;67(3):193-210. doi: 10.1017/mdh.2023.20. Epub 2023 Sep 5.
This article advances historical understandings of health, veterinary medicine and livestock agriculture by examining how, in mid-twentieth-century Britain, the diseases of livestock were made collectively knowable. During this period, the state extended its gaze beyond a few, highly impactful notifiable diseases to a host of other threats to livestock health. The prime mechanism through which this was achieved was the disease survey. Paralleling wider developments in survey practices, it grew from small interwar beginnings into a hugely expensive, wide-ranging state veterinary project that created a new conception of the nation's livestock as a geographical aggregation of animals in varying states of health. This article traces the disease survey's entanglements with dairy cows, farming practices, veterinary professional politics and government agendas. It shows that far from a neutral reflection of reality, surveys both represented and perpetuated specific versions of dairy cow health, varieties of farming practice and visions of the veterinary professional role. At first, their findings proved influential, but over time they found it harder to discipline their increasingly complex human, animal and disease subjects, resulting in unconvincing representations of reality that led ultimately to their marginalization.
本文通过考察 20 世纪中期英国如何使牲畜疾病变得普遍可知,增进了对健康、兽医和家畜农业的历史认识。在此期间,国家的关注范围超出了少数几种影响极大的法定传染病,扩大到了对牲畜健康的一系列其他威胁。实现这一目标的主要机制是疾病调查。与调查实践的更广泛发展并行不悖的是,它从小规模的两次大战之间的开端发展成为一项耗资巨大、范围广泛的国家兽医项目,从而使国家的牲畜概念从健康状况各异的地理动物群集转变而来。本文追溯了疾病调查与奶牛、农业实践、兽医专业政治和政府议程的纠缠。它表明,调查远非对现实的中立反映,而是既代表又延续了特定版本的奶牛健康、各种农业实践和兽医专业角色的愿景。起初,他们的调查结果证明是有影响的,但随着时间的推移,他们发现越来越难以规范他们日益复杂的人类、动物和疾病主体,导致对现实的描述缺乏说服力,最终导致他们被边缘化。