Xie Linfeng, Zhang Guican, He Jian, Shen Yanming, Liao Dongshan, Chen Liangwan, Xu Fan
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Aug 21;10:1221136. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1221136. eCollection 2023.
In children with perimembranous ventricular septal defect, surgical repair requires sternotomy and leaves unsightly scars, which can trigger long-term physical and psychological distress. However, transcatheter device closure is limited by vascular diameter, radiographic exposure, and expensive DSA equipment. We used an ultra-small left intercostal incision for transthoracic device closure to avoid the above problems and investigated its safety and feasibility by comparing it with surgical repair.
This study enrolled 358 children with perimembranous ventricular septal defect. Among them, 152 patients were treated by surgical closure and 206 by transthoracic device closure via an ultra-small left intercostal incision. Perioperative clinical data and postoperative follow-up results were collected and analyzed retrospectively.
The success rate was similar ( = 0.265) in the two groups: 203/206 patients in the device group vs. 152/152 patients in the surgical group. The operative time, intensive care unit time, mechanical ventilation time, and postoperative hospital stay were significantly shorter in the device group than in the surgical group. Although the incision length of the device group (1.1 ± 0.2 cm) was significant shorter ( < 0.001) than that of the surgical group (6.7 ± 1.5 cm), there was no difference in hospitalization costs between the two groups ( = 0.099). Except for small residual shunt (16/206 vs. 3/152, = 0.017), the incidence of complications in the device group was lower or equal to that in the surgical group, and all small residual shunt disappeared during follow-up. There was no thoracic deformity in the device group, compared with 11 cases in the surgery group during follow-up ( < 0.001).
Transthoracic device closure via an ultra-small left intercostal incision under transesophageal echocardiography guidance is safe and feasible. With appropriate indications, it can be a suitable alternative to surgical closure for treating perimembranous ventricular septal defect in children.
对于膜周部室间隔缺损患儿,外科手术修复需要开胸,会留下难看的疤痕,这可能引发长期的生理和心理困扰。然而,经导管装置封堵受血管直径、放射暴露及昂贵的数字减影血管造影(DSA)设备限制。我们采用经左肋间超小切口经胸装置封堵以避免上述问题,并通过与外科修复对比研究其安全性和可行性。
本研究纳入358例膜周部室间隔缺损患儿。其中,152例患者接受外科封堵治疗,206例通过经左肋间超小切口经胸装置封堵治疗。回顾性收集并分析围手术期临床资料及术后随访结果。
两组成功率相似(P = 0.265):装置组206例患者中有203例成功,手术组152例患者全部成功。装置组的手术时间、重症监护病房时间、机械通气时间及术后住院时间均显著短于手术组。虽然装置组的切口长度(1.1±0.2cm)显著短于手术组(6.7±1.5cm)(P < 0.001),但两组住院费用无差异(P = 0.099)。除小的残余分流外(16/206 vs. 3/152,P = 0.017),装置组并发症发生率低于或等于手术组,且所有小的残余分流在随访期间均消失。装置组未出现胸廓畸形,而手术组随访期间有11例出现(P < 0.001)。
在经食管超声心动图引导下经左肋间超小切口经胸装置封堵安全可行。在有适当适应证时,它可以作为治疗儿童膜周部室间隔缺损外科封堵的合适替代方法。