Suppr超能文献

塞佩迪核心词汇表作为增强和替代沟通资源的利益相关者验证。

Stakeholder validation of a Sepedi core vocabulary list as a resource for augmentative and alternative communication.

机构信息

Centre for Augmentative and Alternative Communication, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.

Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria, South Africa.

出版信息

Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2024 Aug;26(4):566-577. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2023.2241671. Epub 2023 Sep 7.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The development of culturally and linguistically appropriate resources to support communication interventions for underserved communities is an urgent necessity. The purpose of the study was to obtain stakeholder feedback on vocabulary items from a Sepedi core vocabulary list developed as a resource for vocabulary selection for augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) systems, and to expand the list based on stakeholders' vocabulary recommendations.

METHOD

A questionnaire was used to obtain the ratings of 57 stakeholders regarding the importance of including 155 Sepedi words from the Sepedi core vocabulary list on an AAC system for a child with receptive language skills at the level of a 4-year-old or higher. Stakeholders also suggested additional words to include on the system.

RESULT

All words were rated as important or very important. However, there was a statistically significant inverse relationship between the average frequency of occurrence of words belonging to a specific category and the average importance rating that stakeholders assigned to words in that category. A total of 48 words were additionally suggested by three or more stakeholders.

CONCLUSION

Stakeholder ratings validated the list as relevant to consult in vocabulary selection for Sepedi AAC systems for children. Stakeholder-suggested words may be a useful supplement to this list.

摘要

目的

为支持服务不足社区的沟通干预措施开发文化和语言适宜的资源是当务之急。本研究的目的是获得利益相关者对从塞佩迪核心词汇表中开发的词汇项目的反馈,该词汇表是为辅助和替代沟通(AAC)系统选择词汇的资源,并且根据利益相关者的词汇建议扩展该列表。

方法

使用问卷获得 57 名利益相关者对在 AAC 系统中为接受性语言技能达到 4 岁或更高水平的儿童包含塞佩迪核心词汇表中的 155 个塞佩迪词的重要性的评价。利益相关者还建议在系统中包含其他词汇。

结果

所有词汇的重要性或非常重要程度都得到了评价。然而,属于特定类别的词汇的平均出现频率与利益相关者为该类别中的词汇分配的平均重要性评分之间存在统计学上的反比关系。共有 48 个词汇被三个或更多的利益相关者额外建议。

结论

利益相关者的评分验证了该列表与塞佩迪 AAC 系统的词汇选择相关。利益相关者建议的词汇可能是该列表的有用补充。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验