Suppr超能文献

抗程序性死亡配体 1 治疗未能降低广泛期小细胞肺癌患者脑转移的风险:一项回顾性分析。

Antiprogrammed death ligand 1 therapy failed to reduce the risk of developing brain metastases in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: A retrospective analysis.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong Province, China.

Department of Surgical Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong Province, China.

出版信息

Cancer. 2024 Jan 1;130(1):18-30. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35003. Epub 2023 Sep 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy (IO) has demonstrated promising results in treating extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), and the management of ES-SCLC brain metastases (BMs) is now receiving significant clinical attention. The objective of this study was to evaluate the role of IO in the clinical management of BMs.

METHODS

Between January 2020 and December 2021, the study included the records of 250 patients who were diagnosed with ES-SCLC. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival, intracranial progression-free survival, and the cumulative incidence of BMs were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and were compared using the log-rank test. In addition, the Cox regression model was used to analyze prognostic factors.

RESULTS

In the entire group, 85 patients had baseline BMs (IO plus chemotherapy [IO + ChT], n = 38; ChT alone, n = 47), and 165 patients (IO + ChT, n = 86; ChT alone, n = 79) did not have BMs at the time of initial diagnosis. The median follow-up was 22.4 months. The OS benefit with first-line antiprogrammed death ligand 1 therapy was maintained regardless of whether patients had BMs (with BMs, 17.97 vs. 13.14 months [p = .03]; without BMs, 18.46 vs. 15.05 months [p = .047]). However, in patients without BMs, IO did not delay the median time to developing brain progression (10.84 vs. 10.74 months; p = .84), and it did not significantly reduce the risk of developing intracranial metastases (the 2-year actuarial risk of developing BMs was 57.0% vs. 50.6%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Antiprogrammed death ligand 1 therapy improved OS regardless of the presence of BMs. However, IO did not delay the median time to brain progression or reduce the risk of intracranial metastasis in patients without baseline BMs. The findings of this study have important clinical implications for the future management of BMs from ES-SCLC.

摘要

背景

免疫疗法(IO)在治疗广泛期小细胞肺癌(ES-SCLC)方面显示出了有前景的结果,因此 ES-SCLC 脑转移(BMs)的管理现在受到了临床的高度关注。本研究旨在评估 IO 在 BMs 临床管理中的作用。

方法

本研究纳入了 2020 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月期间被诊断为 ES-SCLC 的 250 例患者的病历资料。采用 Kaplan-Meier 法计算总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期、颅内无进展生存期和 BMs 的累积发生率,并采用对数秩检验进行比较。此外,还采用 Cox 回归模型分析了预后因素。

结果

在整个研究组中,85 例患者基线时有 BMs(IO 联合化疗 [IO+ChT],n=38;ChT 单药治疗,n=47),而 165 例患者(IO+ChT,n=86;ChT 单药治疗,n=79)在初诊时无 BMs。中位随访时间为 22.4 个月。一线抗程序性死亡配体 1 治疗的 OS 获益与患者是否有 BMs 无关(有 BMs,17.97 个月 vs. 13.14 个月 [p=0.03];无 BMs,18.46 个月 vs. 15.05 个月 [p=0.047])。然而,在无 BMs 的患者中,IO 并未延迟发生脑进展的中位时间(10.84 个月 vs. 10.74 个月;p=0.84),也未显著降低颅内转移的风险(2 年累积发生 BMs 的风险分别为 57.0%和 50.6%)。

结论

抗程序性死亡配体 1 治疗改善了 OS,无论是否存在 BMs。然而,在无基线 BMs 的患者中,IO 并未延迟发生脑进展的时间,也未降低颅内转移的风险。本研究的结果对 ES-SCLC 患者 BMs 的未来管理具有重要的临床意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验