Huang Chien-Tzu, Lee Ching-Ping, Chen Tzu-Yin, Liu Yi-Chang, Cho Shih-Feng, Du Jeng-Shiun, Yu Ming-Lung, Huang Chung-Feng, Wang Sheng-Fan, Hsiao Hui-Hua
Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan.
Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan.
J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 30;12(17):5647. doi: 10.3390/jcm12175647.
Patients with hematologic malignancies are reported to have a more severe course of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and be less responsive to vaccination. In this prospective study, we aimed to evaluate the serological responses to booster COVID-19 vaccines of Taiwanese patients with hematologic malignancies and identify potential predictive markers for effective neutralizing immunity. This study enrolled 68 patients with hematologic malignancies and 68 age- and gender-matched healthy control subjects who received three doses of vaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) from 1 January 2022 to 31 October 2022. The SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G (IgG) spike antibody level was measured with the Abbott assay. The effective neutralization capacity was defined as an anti-spike IgG level of ≥4160 AU/mL. Among the 68 patients with hematologic malignancies, 89.7% achieved seroconversion after booster doses. Seven patients with actively treated lymphoma remained seronegative and had the lowest humoral responses among patients with different types of hematologic malignancies. Despite comparable antibody titers between patients and healthy individuals, rates of effective neutralization (66.2% vs. 86.8%, respectively; = 0.005) were significantly reduced in patients with hematologic malignancies. In a multivariate analysis, the independent predictors for effective neutralization were a lack of B-cell-targeted agents within six months of vaccination (odds ratio, 15.2; 95% confidence interval, 2.7-84.2; = 0.002) and higher immunoglobulin levels (odds ratio, 4.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-14.7; = 0.017). In conclusion, the majority of patients with hematologic malignancies achieved seroconversion after booster vaccination. Patients with ongoing B-cell depletion and hypogammaglobinemia were identified as having negative predictive markers for effective neutralization.
据报道,血液系统恶性肿瘤患者的新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)病程更为严重,且对疫苗接种的反应较差。在这项前瞻性研究中,我们旨在评估台湾血液系统恶性肿瘤患者对COVID-19加强疫苗的血清学反应,并确定有效中和免疫的潜在预测标志物。本研究纳入了68例血液系统恶性肿瘤患者和68例年龄及性别匹配的健康对照者,他们在2022年1月1日至2022年10月31日期间接受了三剂严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)疫苗接种。采用雅培检测法测定SARS-CoV-2免疫球蛋白G(IgG)刺突抗体水平。有效中和能力定义为抗刺突IgG水平≥4160 AU/mL。在68例血液系统恶性肿瘤患者中,89.7%在接种加强剂量后实现了血清转化。7例接受积极治疗的淋巴瘤患者仍为血清阴性,在不同类型血液系统恶性肿瘤患者中体液反应最低。尽管患者和健康个体之间的抗体滴度相当,但血液系统恶性肿瘤患者的有效中和率(分别为66.2%和86.8%;P = 0.005)显著降低。在多变量分析中,有效中和的独立预测因素是接种疫苗后六个月内未使用B细胞靶向药物(比值比,15.2;95%置信区间,2.7 - 84.2;P = 0.002)和较高的免疫球蛋白水平(比值比,4.4;95%置信区间,1.3 - 14.7;P = 0.017)。总之,大多数血液系统恶性肿瘤患者在接种加强疫苗后实现了血清转化。正在接受B细胞耗竭治疗和低丙种球蛋白血症的患者被确定为有效中和的阴性预测标志物。