Köksal Mümtaz, Özkan Oğuzhan, Holderried Tobias, Heine Annkristin, Brossart Peter, Gawish Ahmed, Scafa Davide, Sarria Gustavo R, Leitzen Christina, Schmeel Leonard C, Müdder Thomas
Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Department of Internal Medicine-Oncology, Hematology and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Aug 23;15(17):4220. doi: 10.3390/cancers15174220.
Modern irradiation techniques for optimized conformal TBI can be realized by Helical Tomotherapy (HT) or Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT), depending on the availability of suitable specialized equipment. In this dosimetric planning study, we compared both modalities and addressed the question of whether VMAT with small field sizes is also suitable as a backup in case of HT equipment malfunctions. For this purpose, we retrospectively used planning computed tomography (CT) data from 10 patients treated with HT with a total dose of 8 Gy (n = 5) or 12 Gy (n = 5) for treatment planning for VMAT with a small field size (36 × 22 cm). The target volume coverage, dose homogeneity at target volume, and dose reduction in organs at risk (OAR) (lungs, kidneys, lenses) were analyzed and compared. One patient was irradiated with both modalities due to a device failure of the HT equipment during the study, which facilitated a comparison in a real clinical setting. The findings indicate that in addition to a higher mean dose to the lenses in the 12 Gy group for VMAT and a better dose homogeneity in the target volume for HT, comparably good and adequate target dose coverage and dose reduction in the other OAR could be achieved for both modalities, with significantly longer treatment times for VMAT. In conclusion, after appropriate optimization of the treatment times, VMAT using linear accelerator radiosurgery technology can be used both as a backup in addition to HT and in clinical routines to perform optimized conformal TBI.
根据合适的专用设备的可用性,可通过螺旋断层放疗(HT)或容积调强弧形放疗(VMAT)实现用于优化适形全脑照射(TBI)的现代照射技术。在这项剂量学规划研究中,我们比较了这两种方式,并探讨了小射野尺寸的VMAT在HT设备出现故障时是否也适合作为备用方式的问题。为此,我们回顾性地使用了10例接受HT治疗的患者的计划计算机断层扫描(CT)数据,总剂量为8 Gy(n = 5)或12 Gy(n = 5),用于小射野尺寸(36×22 cm)的VMAT治疗计划。分析并比较了靶区体积覆盖率、靶区内剂量均匀性以及危及器官(OAR)(肺、肾、晶状体)的剂量降低情况。在研究期间,由于HT设备出现故障,1例患者接受了两种方式的照射,这有助于在实际临床环境中进行比较。研究结果表明,除了VMAT照射的12 Gy组晶状体平均剂量较高以及HT在靶区内剂量均匀性较好外,两种方式在其他OAR中均可实现相当好且足够的靶区剂量覆盖和剂量降低,不过VMAT的治疗时间明显更长。总之,在适当优化治疗时间后,使用直线加速器放射外科技术的VMAT既可以作为HT的备用方式,也可以用于临床常规操作以进行优化适形TBI。