Department of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
School Psychology and Development in Context, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; UNIBS, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
J Affect Disord. 2023 Dec 1;342:210-217. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.08.134. Epub 2023 Sep 9.
With the introduction of non-suicidal self-injury disorder (NSSI-D) in DSM-5, the field obtained a standardised set of criteria to study those engaging in more severe and chronic NSSI. To date, no previous research has studied the development of NSSI-D longitudinally, leaving questions on its stability and potential prospective predictors unanswered.
2162 community adolescents (M = 15.00 years, SD = 1.88, 53.9 % girls at T1) completed a set of self-report questionnaires for three consecutive years and were classified into three severity-based NSSI subgroups (no-NSSI, subthreshold-NSSI, NSSI-D). Multinomial logistic regression analyses were used to prospectively predict subgroup membership by age, gender, identity development, depressive symptoms, traumatic experiences, and resilience.
At baseline, the sample was distributed over the no-NSSI group (88 %), the subthreshold-NSSI (6 %) and NSSI-D (6 %) groups. These groups respectively showed high (93.5 %), low (25 %) and moderate (47.5 %) stability over one-year intervals. Longitudinally, higher levels of identity confusion and trauma significantly increased the likelihood of transitioning to subthreshold-NSSI. Moreover, boys had a higher likelihood of transitioning from NSSI-D to no-NSSI over the course of one year.
This three-year study provides the first indication of the longitudinal course of NSSI-D with the current set of DSM-5 criteria. Clinically, the results suggest the particular potential of identity confusion and trauma as prevention targets in community adolescents.
随着 DSM-5 中引入非自杀性自伤障碍(NSSI-D),该领域获得了一套研究更严重和慢性 NSSI 的标准。迄今为止,尚无先前的研究从纵向角度研究 NSSI-D 的发展,这使得其稳定性和潜在的前瞻性预测因素问题悬而未决。
2162 名社区青少年(M=15.00 岁,SD=1.88,T1 时 53.9%为女孩)连续三年完成了一系列自我报告问卷,并根据严重程度分为三组 NSSI(无-NSSI、阈下-NSSI、NSSI-D)。使用多项逻辑回归分析前瞻性地预测年龄、性别、身份发展、抑郁症状、创伤经历和适应力对亚组归属的影响。
在基线时,样本分布在无-NSSI 组(88%)、阈下-NSSI 组(6%)和 NSSI-D 组(6%)。这些组在一年的时间间隔内分别表现出高度(93.5%)、低度(25%)和中度(47.5%)的稳定性。纵向来看,较高的身份混淆和创伤水平显著增加了发展为阈下-NSSI 的可能性。此外,男孩在一年内从 NSSI-D 转变为无-NSSI 的可能性更高。
这项为期三年的研究首次提供了使用当前 DSM-5 标准的 NSSI-D 的纵向病程的指示。临床上,结果表明身份混淆和创伤作为社区青少年预防目标的特殊潜力。