Suppr超能文献

津巴布韦高等教育机构学者在掠夺性期刊上发表论文的情况:以一所大学为例

Extent of publishing in predatory journals by academics in higher education institutions in Zimbabwe: A case study of a university.

作者信息

Jingura R M, Chigwada J, Diver T, Shangwa D

机构信息

Directorate of Quality Assurance, Chinhoyi University of Technology, Chinhoyi, Zimbabwe.

School of Interdisciplinary Research and Graduate Studies, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa.

出版信息

Account Res. 2025 Feb;32(2):143-157. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2023.2256672. Epub 2023 Sep 11.

Abstract

The publish or perish concept requires academics to ensure that they take part in research and publish the research results in academic journals. The emergency of predatory publishers has led to negativity in the scholarly publishing process. Some researchers are unaware that some publishers are unethical. A study was conducted to determine the extent of predatory publishing in Zimbabwe among academics. A survey was carried out using a multi-method approach at a public university in Zimbabwe. Articles published between 2012 and 2022 were retrieved using the Harzing publish or perish software. In total, 977 articles were retrieved, and after data cleaning using Open Refine, 357 records were analyzed using the journal evaluation rubric and scoring sheet to note the extent of predatory publishing among the various schools. The articles were then classified into 3 sections i.e., predatory, not predatory, and borderline. The findings revealed that predatory publishing is prevalent in the social sciences. The authors recommend the importance of training to create awareness about the dangers of predatory publishing and how to avoid them to improve the scholarly output of the institution, which is key to university ranking.

摘要

“不发表就出局”的理念要求学者确保参与研究并在学术期刊上发表研究成果。掠夺性出版商的出现给学术出版过程带来了负面影响。一些研究人员并未意识到有些出版商是不道德的。开展了一项研究以确定津巴布韦学者中掠夺性出版的程度。在津巴布韦的一所公立大学采用多方法进行了一项调查。使用哈津“不发表就出局”软件检索了2012年至2022年期间发表的文章。总共检索到977篇文章,在使用Open Refine进行数据清理后,使用期刊评估标准和评分表对357条记录进行了分析,以了解各学院掠夺性出版的程度。然后将文章分为3类,即掠夺性、非掠夺性和临界性。研究结果表明,掠夺性出版在社会科学领域很普遍。作者建议开展培训,以提高对掠夺性出版危害的认识以及如何避免这些危害,从而提高机构的学术产出,这对大学排名至关重要。

相似文献

1
Extent of publishing in predatory journals by academics in higher education institutions in Zimbabwe: A case study of a university.
Account Res. 2025 Feb;32(2):143-157. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2023.2256672. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
2
Best practices for scholarly authors in the age of predatory journals.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2016 Feb;98(2):77-9. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2016.0056.
3
Predatory Open Access in Rehabilitation.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 May;98(5):1051-1056. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.01.002. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
4
False gold: Safely navigating open access publishing to avoid predatory publishers and journals.
J Adv Nurs. 2018 Apr;74(4):809-817. doi: 10.1111/jan.13483. Epub 2017 Nov 17.
5
Predatory Publishers/Journals in Medical Sciences: How to Avoid, Stop, and What to Do after Being Scammed by Them?
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2020 Sep;51(3):782-787. doi: 10.1007/s12029-020-00418-8.
6
Analysis of Citation Patterns and Impact of Predatory Sources in the Nursing Literature.
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2020 May;52(3):311-319. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12557. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
8
Analysis of thirteen predatory publishers: a trap for eager-to-publish researchers.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2018 Jan;34(1):157-162. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1358160. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
9
Ethical issues in publishing in predatory journals.
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2017 Jun 15;27(2):279-284. doi: 10.11613/BM.2017.030.
10
The rise of predatory publishing and journals.
Br Dent J. 2024 Nov;237(9):699-700. doi: 10.1038/s41415-024-8006-3. Epub 2024 Nov 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Do orthopaedics surgeons have any idea what predatory journals are?:(cross-sectional study).
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 19;10(5):e26448. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26448. eCollection 2024 Mar 15.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验