Suppr超能文献

使用配对比较法确定公认的推动因素在英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)的卫生专业人员离开决策中的相对显著程度。

Determining the relative salience of recognised push variables on health professional decisions to leave the UK National Health Service (NHS) using the method of paired comparisons.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK

School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 12;13(8):e070016. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070016.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The primary and secondary impacts from the COVID-19 pandemic are claimed to have had a detrimental impact on health professional retention within the UK National Health Service (NHS). This study set out to identify priorities for intervention by scaling the relative importance of widely cited push (leave) influences.

DESIGN

During Summer/Autumn 2021, a UK-wide opportunity sample (n=1958) of NHS health professionals completed an online paired-comparisons exercise to determine the relative salience of work-related stress, workload intensity, time pressure, staffing levels, working hours, work-homelife balance, recognition of effort and pay as reasons why health professionals leave NHS employment.

SETTING

The study is believed to be the first large-scale systematic assessment of factors driving staff exits from the NHS since the COVID-19 pandemic.

RESULTS

All professions gave primacy to work-related stress, workload intensity and staffing levels. Pay was typically located around the midpoint of the respective scales; recognition of effort and working hours were ranked lowest. However, differences were apparent in the rank order and relative weighting of push variables between health professions and care delivery functions. Ambulance paramedics present as an outlier, notably with respect to staffing level (F-stat 4.47, p=0.004) and the primacy of work-homelife balance. Relative to staffing level, other push variables exert a stronger influence on paramedics than nurses or doctors ( 4.29, p=0.006).

CONCLUSION

Findings are relevant to future NHS health professional retention intervention strategy. Excepting paramedics/ambulance services, rankings of leave variables across the different health professional families and organisation types exhibit strong alignment at the ordinal level. However, demographic differences in the weightings and rankings, ascribed to push factors by professional family and organisation type, suggests that, in addition to signposting universal (all-staff) priorities for intervention, bespoke solutions for different professions and functions may be needed.

摘要

目的

据称,COVID-19 大流行的主要和次要影响对英国国民保健服务(NHS)内卫生专业人员的保留产生了不利影响。本研究旨在通过衡量广泛引用的离职(离开)影响的相对重要性,确定干预的优先事项。

设计

在 2021 年夏季/秋季期间,英国范围内的 NHS 卫生专业人员机会样本(n=1958)完成了一项在线配对比较练习,以确定与工作相关的压力、工作量强度、时间压力、人员配置水平、工作时间、工作与生活平衡、努力的认可和薪酬作为卫生专业人员离开 NHS 就业的原因的相对重要性。

设置

据信,自 COVID-19 大流行以来,这是对推动 NHS 员工离职的因素进行的首次大规模系统评估。

结果

所有职业都将与工作相关的压力、工作量强度和人员配置水平放在首位。薪酬通常位于各自量表的中间位置;努力的认可和工作时间排名最低。然而,在卫生专业人员和护理提供功能之间,推动变量的排名顺序和相对权重存在明显差异。救护车护理人员是一个例外,特别是在人员配置水平(F 统计量 4.47,p=0.004)和工作与生活平衡的首要性方面。与人员配置水平相比,其他推动变量对护理人员的影响比对护士或医生更大( 4.29,p=0.006)。

结论

研究结果与 NHS 未来卫生专业人员保留干预策略相关。除了救护车/救护服务外,不同卫生专业人员家庭和组织类型的离职变量的排名在有序水平上表现出很强的一致性。然而,按专业家庭和组织类型划分的推动因素的权重和排名存在差异,这表明,除了为普遍(全体员工)干预措施指明优先事项外,可能还需要针对不同职业和功能制定定制解决方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47ec/10514647/d938af4d4bf3/bmjopen-2022-070016f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验