Suppr超能文献

口服糖皮质激素治疗基层医疗中慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期门诊患者的疗效和安全性:一项多中心实用随机对照研究。

Efficacy and safety of oral corticosteroids to treat outpatients with acute exacerbations of COPD in primary care: a multicentre pragmatic randomised controlled study.

作者信息

Thebault Jean-Laurent, Roche Nicolas, Abdoul Hendy, Lorenzo Alain, Similowski Thomas, Ghasarossian Christian

机构信息

Département de Médecine Générale, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.

AP-HP, Centre - Université Paris Cité, Cochin Hospital and Institute (INSERM UMR1016), Respiratory Medicine, Paris, France.

出版信息

ERJ Open Res. 2023 Sep 11;9(5). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00057-2023. eCollection 2023 Sep.

Abstract

AIM

To compare prednisone and placebo for the treatment of outpatients treated for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in a primary care setting.

METHODS

A multicentre, parallel, double-blind, pragmatic randomised controlled trial was performed in France. A total of 66 general practitioners included patients aged ≥40 years with cumulative smoking of ≥10 pack-years and a diagnosis of certain or likely acute exacerbation of COPD. Oral prednisone (40 mg) or placebo were administered daily for 5 days. The main outcome was treatment failure at 8 weeks, defined as a composite criterion based on the occurrence of at least one of the following: unplanned visit to an emergency department or to a practitioner in the ambulatory setting, hospital admission or death. The planned sample size was 202 patients per group.

RESULTS

175 patients were included from February 2015 to May 2017 (43% of the planned sample). All-cause 8-week treatment failure rate was 42.0% in the prednisone group and 34.5% in the placebo group (relative risk 1.22, 95% CI 0.87-1.69, p=0.25). Respiratory-related 8-week treatment failure rate was 27.6% in the prednisone group and 13.6% in the placebo group (relative risk 2.00, 95% CI 1.15-3.57, p=0.015).

CONCLUSION

Although the planned sample size was not achieved, the study does not suggest that oral corticosteroids are more effective than placebo for the treatment of an acute exacerbation of COPD in a primary care setting.

摘要

目的

在初级医疗环境中比较泼尼松与安慰剂治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)急性加重期门诊患者的效果。

方法

在法国进行了一项多中心、平行、双盲、实用性随机对照试验。共有66名全科医生纳入了年龄≥40岁、累积吸烟量≥10包年且诊断为确诊或疑似COPD急性加重的患者。口服泼尼松(40毫克)或安慰剂,每日一次,共5天。主要结局为8周时的治疗失败,定义为基于以下至少一项发生情况的综合标准:非计划就诊于急诊科或门诊医生、住院或死亡。计划样本量为每组202例患者。

结果

2015年2月至2017年5月共纳入175例患者(计划样本的43%)。泼尼松组8周全因治疗失败率为42.0%,安慰剂组为34.5%(相对风险1.22,95%可信区间0.87 - 1.69,p = 0.25)。泼尼松组8周呼吸相关治疗失败率为27.6%,安慰剂组为13.6%(相对风险2.00,95%可信区间1.15 - 3.57,p = 0.015)。

结论

尽管未达到计划样本量,但该研究并不表明在初级医疗环境中,口服糖皮质激素治疗COPD急性加重比安慰剂更有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验