Verdonschot K H M, Arts S, Van den Boezem P B, de Wilt J H W, Fütterer J J, Stommel M W J, Overduin C G
Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2023 Jul-Dec;23(9):977-993. doi: 10.1080/14737140.2023.2247564. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
This study aims to systematically review current evidence on ablative margins and correlation to local tumor progression (LTP) after thermal ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and colorectal liver metastases (CRLM).
A systematic search was performed in PubMed (MEDLINE) and Web of Science to identify all studies that reported on ablative margins (AM) and related LTP rates. Studies were assessed for risk of bias and synthesized separately per tumor type. Where possible, results were pooled to calculate risk differences (RD) as function of AM.
In total, 2910 articles were identified of which 43 articles were eligible for final analysis. There was high variability in AM measurement methodology across studies in terms of measurement technique, imaging modalities, and timing. Most common margin stratification was < 5 mm and > 5 mm, for which data were available in 25/43 studies (58%). Of these, all studies favored AM > 5 mm to reduce the risk of LTP, with absolute RD of 16% points for HCC and 47% points for CRLM as compared to AM < 5 mm.
Current evidence supports AM > 5 mm to reduce the risk of LTP after thermal ablation of HCC and CRLM. However, standardization of AM measurement and reporting is critical to allow future meta-analyses and improved identification of optimal threshold value for clinical use.
本研究旨在系统回顾目前关于肝细胞癌(HCC)和结直肠癌肝转移(CRLM)热消融术后消融边缘及其与局部肿瘤进展(LTP)相关性的证据。
在PubMed(MEDLINE)和Web of Science中进行系统检索,以识别所有报告消融边缘(AM)和相关LTP发生率的研究。对研究进行偏倚风险评估,并按肿瘤类型分别进行综合分析。在可能的情况下,汇总结果以计算作为AM函数的风险差异(RD)。
总共识别出2910篇文章,其中43篇文章符合最终分析的条件。在测量技术、成像方式和时间方面,各研究的AM测量方法存在很大差异。最常见的边缘分层是<5mm和>5mm,25/43项研究(58%)中有相关数据。其中,所有研究都倾向于AM>5mm以降低LTP风险,与AM<5mm相比,HCC的绝对RD为16个百分点,CRLM为47个百分点。
目前的证据支持AM>5mm以降低HCC和CRLM热消融术后LTP的风险。然而,AM测量和报告的标准化对于未来的荟萃分析以及更好地确定临床使用的最佳阈值至关重要。