Chandar Sekaran Prakash, Raganathan Santhosh, Ramachandran Ramasubramani
Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering and Technology, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, Chengalpattu, 603203, India.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Oct;30(47):104408-104414. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-29771-4. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
Among the largest CO emission industries, the cement industry is ranked in 2nd place. A large volume of CO is emitted at the clinker production, which is a cement manufacturing intermediate product. Countries around the world were having difficulty reducing atmospheric emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG). Concrete is still being used more and more as the nation's infrastructure advances. The amount of CO emitted by concrete can be decreased by using less cement or substituting other materials for cement. In this study, the CO emission analysis is made on M40 grade, which is that metakaolin (MK) and alccofine (AL) are replaced to the cement in the manufacturing of concrete and is compared with the conventional concrete. The optimum cement replacement of MK and AL is 10% in the production of M40 grade concrete. MK and AL concrete have advantages and disadvantages. If proper safety precautions are taken during the manufacturing process, the toxicity level can be reduced, as well as the amount of CO released by the cement during the production of concrete. The LCA (life cycle analysis) is made for the concrete specimens, and the results were interpreted to know which concrete sample emits less and more carbon dioxide. The LCA study provided insights into the environmental aspects of metakaolin and alccofine concrete, including potential reductions in CO emissions, energy consumption and other environmental indicators. It helps identify areas of improvement and informs decision-making processes regarding sustainable material choices and construction practices. In M40 grade concrete, a 10% cement replacement with metakaolin and alccofine was found to be ideal. These results could also help in identifying the major cause of CO emission, and they can be used for further research purposes.
在最大的一氧化碳排放行业中,水泥行业排名第二。在熟料生产过程中会排放大量一氧化碳,熟料是水泥制造的中间产品。世界各国在减少大气温室气体(GHG)排放方面都面临困难。随着国家基础设施的发展,混凝土的使用量仍在不断增加。通过减少水泥用量或用其他材料替代水泥,可以降低混凝土的一氧化碳排放量。在本研究中,对M40等级混凝土进行了一氧化碳排放分析,即在混凝土制造过程中用偏高岭土(MK)和硅灰石(AL)替代水泥,并与传统混凝土进行比较。在M40等级混凝土生产中,MK和AL的最佳水泥替代量为10%。MK和AL混凝土有优点也有缺点。如果在制造过程中采取适当的安全措施,毒性水平可以降低,同时混凝土生产过程中水泥释放的一氧化碳量也会减少。对混凝土试件进行了生命周期分析(LCA),并对结果进行了解释,以了解哪种混凝土样品排放的二氧化碳较少和较多。LCA研究提供了关于偏高岭土和硅灰石混凝土环境方面的见解,包括一氧化碳排放、能源消耗和其他环境指标的潜在减少。它有助于确定改进领域,并为关于可持续材料选择和施工实践的决策过程提供信息。在M40等级混凝土中,用偏高岭土和硅灰石替代10%的水泥被认为是理想的。这些结果也有助于确定一氧化碳排放的主要原因,可用于进一步的研究目的。