Suppr超能文献

缺血性中风患者失眠的三种测量方法比较:匹兹堡睡眠质量指数、失眠严重程度指数和雅典失眠量表。

Comparison of three measures for insomnia in ischemic stroke patients: Pittsburgh sleep quality index, insomnia severity index, and Athens insomnia scale.

作者信息

Niu Shuzhen, Wu Qian, Ding Silian, Wu Lingchun, Wang Li, Shi Yan

机构信息

Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.

Shanghai Fourth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2023 Aug 30;14:1118322. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1118322. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated the consistency and determined the optimal threshold values of three scales in the diagnosis of insomnia of ischemic stroke (IS) patients.

METHODS

Participants in this study consisted of 569 acute IS patients. All 569 patients completed the assessment of the three insomnia scales. Insomnia of IS patients were assessed by Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI), Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), and Athens insomnia scale (AIS). Also, basic patient information, neurological function, and activities of daily living were assessed. General information was compared between the insomnia group and the no-insomnia group. Cronbach's α coefficients, Cohen's Kappa consistency, Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and DeLong's test analysis were used to analyze the reliability and diagnostic validity of PSQI, ISI, and AIS.

RESULTS

The PSQI and ISI showed high reliability with Cronbach's α of 0.875 and 0.858, respectively, while the AIS had an α coefficient of 0.734, demonstrating acceptable reliability. The PSQI, ISI, and AIS showed outstanding diagnostic ability with an AUC of 0.960 (95% CI: 0.946, 0.974), 0.911 (95% CI: 0.882, 0.941), and 0.876 (95% CI:0.837, 0.916). The best diagnostic cutoffs for PSQI, ISI, and AIS are ≥9, ≥15, and ≥8.

CONCLUSION

Each of the three questionnaires has advantages and disadvantages when assessing insomnia. In the evaluation of insomnia in IS patients, the best questionnaire selection should be made according to the purpose of clinical evaluation and considering the sensitivity and specificity.

摘要

目的

本研究调查了三种量表在缺血性脑卒中(IS)患者失眠诊断中的一致性,并确定了最佳阈值。

方法

本研究的参与者包括569例急性IS患者。所有569例患者均完成了三种失眠量表的评估。采用匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)、失眠严重程度指数(ISI)和阿森斯失眠量表(AIS)对IS患者的失眠情况进行评估。此外,还评估了患者的基本信息、神经功能和日常生活活动能力。比较了失眠组和非失眠组的一般信息。采用Cronbach's α系数、Cohen's Kappa一致性、受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线和DeLong检验分析来分析PSQI、ISI和AIS的可靠性和诊断效度。

结果

PSQI和ISI显示出较高的可靠性,Cronbach's α分别为0.875和0.858,而AIS的α系数为0.734,显示出可接受的可靠性。PSQI、ISI和AIS显示出出色的诊断能力,曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.960(95%可信区间:0.946,0.974)、0.911(95%可信区间:0.882,0.941)和0.876(95%可信区间:0.837,0.916)。PSQI、ISI和AIS的最佳诊断临界值分别为≥9、≥15和≥8。

结论

三种问卷在评估失眠时各有优缺点。在评估IS患者的失眠时,应根据临床评估目的并考虑敏感性和特异性来选择最佳问卷。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/338b/10498538/6253dcc43614/fneur-14-1118322-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验