Department of Emergency, The Affiliated Huaian No.1 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Huai'an, Jiangsu, 223300, China.
Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand). 2023 Aug 31;69(8):45-49. doi: 10.14715/cmb/2023.69.8.7.
This study was performed to explore the application value of next-generation sequencing (NGS) of bronchial alveolar lavage fluid (BALF) in emergency patients with infection. In this regard, a total of 52 patients with infection who were diagnosed and treated in the emergency department of our hospital from September 2019 to September 2021 were selected as the research objects. The BALF of the patients was analyzed by NGS, and the results were compared with the pathogen detection results of traditional microbial culture of the patients to analyze the diagnostic value of NGS in patients with infection. The results showed that among the 52 patients, 47 were positive by NGS and 13 were positive by traditional microbial culture. The pathogen detection rate of NGS was higher than that of traditional microbial culture[90.4% (47/52) VS 25% (13/52), χ2=45.539, P<0.001], and was able to detect viruses, fungi and other special pathogens that were difficult to be detected by traditional microbial culture, such as Chlamydia psittaci. A total of 129 pathogens were detected in the NGS test results of 47 of these patients, including bacteria, fungi, viruses and mycoplasma/chlamydia. 14 pathogens were detected in the conventional microbiological cultures of 13 patients, including bacteria and fungi. Overall, compared with traditional microbial culture methods, NGS detection has higher accuracy and can effectively detect pathogens that cannot be detected by traditional microbial culture. It has a high application value in the diagnosis of pathogens and can provide clinical guidance for the diagnosis of pathogens in patients with emergency infections.
本研究旨在探讨支气管肺泡灌洗液(BALF)下一代测序(NGS)在感染急诊患者中的应用价值。为此,选取 2019 年 9 月至 2021 年 9 月在我院急诊科诊断和治疗的 52 例感染患者为研究对象,对患者的 BALF 进行 NGS 分析,并与患者传统微生物培养的病原体检测结果进行比较,分析 NGS 在感染患者中的诊断价值。结果显示,52 例患者中,NGS 阳性 47 例,传统微生物培养阳性 13 例,NGS 病原体检测率高于传统微生物培养[90.4%(47/52)比 25%(13/52),χ2=45.539,P<0.001],能检测到传统微生物培养难以检测的病毒、真菌等特殊病原体,如鹦鹉热衣原体。47 例患者的 NGS 检测结果共检出 129 种病原体,包括细菌、真菌、病毒和支原体/衣原体。13 例患者的常规微生物培养检出 14 种病原体,包括细菌和真菌。总体而言,与传统微生物培养方法相比,NGS 检测具有更高的准确性,能有效检测传统微生物培养无法检测的病原体,在感染急诊患者的病原体诊断中具有较高的应用价值,可为感染患者的病原体诊断提供临床指导。