• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中文版早产儿风险评估量表 23 项版本的制定与验证。

Development and validation of the 23-item preterm birth risk assessment scale-Korean version.

机构信息

School of Nursing, College of Medicine, Women Health Nursing, Soonchunhyang University, 31 Soonchunhyang 6-Gil, Dongnam-Gu, Cheonan City, 31151, Chungnam Province, Korea.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Sep 16;23(1):668. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05975-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12884-023-05975-x
PMID:37716962
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10504700/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Preterm birth (PTB) is a complex and significant challenge in obstetrics. Thus, clinicians and researchers have paid a keen interest in the identification of women at a high risk for PTB. This study aimed to develop a PTB risk assessment scale based on the preliminary 32-item Preterm Birth Risk Assessment Scale-Korean version (PBRAS-K).

METHODS

We enrolled 298 participants (167 in the exploratory factor analysis group from March 3, 2021 to August 31, 2021 and 131 in the confirmatory factor analysis group from December 3, 2021 to February 14, 2022) who delivered before 37 weeks after experiencing preterm symptoms and were admitted to high-risk pregnancy maternal-fetal intensive care units (MFICUs). After an item-reduction process in the exploratory factor analysis, the psychometric property scales were assessed using SPSS Statistics version 27.0, and the confirmatory factor analysis was conducted using AMOS version 27.0.

RESULTS

The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) test and Bartlett's χ test of sphericity confirmed the adequacy of the sample for factor analysis (KMO = .81 (> .80), χ = 1841.38, p < .001). The final version of the PBRAS-K comprised 23 items within seven dimensions. Factor analysis identified items explaining 65.9% of the total variance. The PBRAS-K achieved a mean score of 35.58 (± 10.35) and showed high internal consistency and satisfactory reliability (Cronbach's alpha = .85). Regarding concurrent validity, the PBRAS-K exhibited a low-to-moderate correlation with the PTB risk (r = .45, p < .001). As for criterion validity and convergent validity, the PBRAS-K showed a positive and high correlation with the Somatic Awareness Scale with Spontaneous Preterm Labor (SPL-SAS) (r = .65, p < .001) and pregnancy-related stress (r = .57, p < .001), respectively. Risk scoring for preterm delivery and SPL-SAS were moderately correlated (r = .53, p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

PBRAS-23-K is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing the risk for PTB in pregnant women. Clinical nurses are encouraged to apply and obtain information regarding effective interventions in MFICUs. This scale provides meaningful results and reflects the opinions of women who had experienced PTB. The PBRAS-23-K should be evaluated for standardization and cut-off scores using larger sample sizes in the future.

摘要

背景

早产 (PTB) 是产科的一个复杂而重大的挑战。因此,临床医生和研究人员对识别有早产高风险的女性产生了浓厚的兴趣。本研究旨在基于初步的 32 项早产风险评估量表-韩国版 (PBRAS-K) 开发一种 PTB 风险评估量表。

方法

我们招募了 298 名参与者(2021 年 3 月 3 日至 8 月 31 日期间在探索性因素分析组的 167 名和 2021 年 12 月 3 日至 2022 年 2 月 14 日期间在验证性因素分析组的 131 名),他们在出现早产症状并被收入高危妊娠产妇胎儿重症监护病房 (MFICU) 后,在 37 周前分娩。在探索性因素分析的项目删减过程之后,使用 SPSS Statistics 版本 27.0 评估心理测量学特性量表,使用 AMOS 版本 27.0 进行验证性因素分析。

结果

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) 检验和 Bartlett 的球形 χ 检验证实了因子分析样本的充分性(KMO =.81 (>.80),χ = 1841.38,p <.001)。PBRAS-K 的最终版本由七个维度的 23 个项目组成。因素分析确定了解释总方差 65.9%的项目。PBRAS-K 的平均得分为 35.58(± 10.35),具有较高的内部一致性和令人满意的可靠性(克朗巴赫的 alpha =.85)。关于同时效度,PBRAS-K 与早产风险呈低到中度相关(r =.45,p <.001)。至于标准效度和收敛效度,PBRAS-K 与躯体意识量表自发性早产 (SPL-SAS)(r =.65,p <.001)和妊娠相关压力(r =.57,p <.001)呈正相关,分别。早产风险评分与 SPL-SAS 呈中度相关(r =.53,p <.001)。

结论

PBRAS-23-K 是一种评估孕妇早产风险的有效且可靠的工具。鼓励临床护士在 MFICU 中应用并获得有关有效干预措施的信息。该量表提供了有意义的结果,并反映了经历过早产的女性的意见。未来应使用更大的样本量评估 PBRAS-23-K 的标准化和截断分数。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60fe/10504700/adae2246b04c/12884_2023_5975_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60fe/10504700/bc6720409f87/12884_2023_5975_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60fe/10504700/adae2246b04c/12884_2023_5975_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60fe/10504700/bc6720409f87/12884_2023_5975_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60fe/10504700/adae2246b04c/12884_2023_5975_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and validation of the 23-item preterm birth risk assessment scale-Korean version.中文版早产儿风险评估量表 23 项版本的制定与验证。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Sep 16;23(1):668. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05975-x.
2
Korean Version of Inventory of Complicated Grief Scale: Psychometric Properties in Korean Adolescents.《复杂悲伤量表韩国版:韩国青少年的心理测量特性》
J Korean Med Sci. 2016 Jan;31(1):114-9. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.1.114. Epub 2015 Dec 24.
3
Development and Verification of an Internet Game Literacy Scale.互联网游戏素养量表的编制与验证。
J Korean Med Sci. 2021 Sep 6;36(35):e216. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e216.
4
Validation of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in an Indonesian population: a scale adaptation study.医院焦虑和抑郁量表在印度尼西亚人群中的验证:量表适应性研究。
Fam Med Community Health. 2023 Jun;11(2). doi: 10.1136/fmch-2022-001775.
5
Designing and psychometric evaluation of disease-related fear scale (D-RFS) in adults with epilepsy: A sequential exploratory mixed methods design.成人癫痫患者疾病相关恐惧量表(D-RFS)的设计和心理计量学评估:序贯探索性混合方法设计。
Epilepsy Behav. 2020 Sep;110:107169. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107169. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
6
Development and validation of a scale to measure hypertensive Chinese individual's behavior toward salt reduction consumption.用于测量高血压个体减盐消费行为的量表的制定和验证。
BMC Public Health. 2024 May 31;24(1):1459. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18925-9.
7
The localization and improvement of the Functional Status Scale and the reliability and validity in very low birth weight infants.极低出生体重儿功能状态量表的本地化及信效度研究。
Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2022 Nov 25;51(5):603-612. doi: 10.3724/zdxbyxb-2022-0336.
8
Psychometric Properties and Factor Structures of the Korean Version of Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised.儿童抑郁评定量表修订版韩文版的心理测量特性与因子结构
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2018 May;28(4):285-292. doi: 10.1089/cap.2016.0183. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
9
Caregiver strain among patients of palliative care in Sri Lanka: validation of modified caregiver strain index - Sinhala version.斯里兰卡姑息治疗患者的照顾者压力:改良照顾者压力指数-Sinhala 版本的验证。
BMC Palliat Care. 2023 Nov 4;22(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01270-w.
10
Valid and reliable neonatal near-miss assessment scale in Ethiopia: a psychometric validation.在埃塞俄比亚,有效的和可靠的新生儿near-miss 评估量表:心理测量学验证。
Glob Health Action. 2022 Dec 31;15(1):2029334. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2022.2029334.

引用本文的文献

1
Influence of psychosocial factors and parent-student relationships on the academic engagement of TCM students: a structural equation modeling and multi-criteria decision-making framework.心理社会因素及亲子关系对中医学生学业投入的影响:结构方程建模与多准则决策框架
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 22;16:1619509. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1619509. eCollection 2025.
2
Moderating Effect of General Self-Efficacy on the Relationship between Pregnancy Stress, Daily Hassles Stress, and Preterm Birth Risk in Women Experiencing Preterm Labor: A Cross-Sectional Study.一般自我效能感对早产经历孕妇早产风险与孕期压力、日常困扰压力关系的调节作用:一项横断面研究。
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2024 Aug;54(3):329-339. doi: 10.4040/jkan.24008.

本文引用的文献

1
[Visualization of unstructured personal narratives of perterm birth using text network analysis].[使用文本网络分析对早产的非结构化个人叙述进行可视化]
Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2020 Sep 30;26(3):205-212. doi: 10.4069/kjwhn.2020.08.08. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
2
Practical Consideration of Factor Analysis for the Assessment of Construct Validity.用于评估结构效度的因素分析的实际考量
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2021 Dec;51(6):643-647. doi: 10.4040/jkan.51601.
3
A hierarchical procedure to select intrauterine and extrauterine factors for methodological validation of preterm birth risk estimation.
一种分层程序,用于选择宫内和宫外因素,以对早产风险估计的方法学验证。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Apr 16;21(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03654-3.
4
Preterm birth: now the leading cause of child death worldwide.早产:如今已成为全球儿童死亡的首要原因。
Sci Transl Med. 2014 Nov 19;6(263):263ed21. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa2563.
5
[A guide on the use of factor analysis in the assessment of construct validity].[因子分析在结构效度评估中的应用指南]
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2013 Oct;43(5):587-94. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2013.43.5.587.
6
Stress pathways to spontaneous preterm birth: the role of stressors, psychological distress, and stress hormones.导致自发性早产的应激途径:应激源、心理困扰及应激激素的作用
Am J Epidemiol. 2009 Jun 1;169(11):1319-26. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwp061. Epub 2009 Apr 10.
7
Familialism, social support, and stress: positive implications for pregnant Latinas.家族主义、社会支持与压力:对怀孕的拉丁裔女性的积极影响
Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2008 Apr;14(2):155-62. doi: 10.1037/1099-9809.14.2.155.
8
Perinatal depression: a systematic review of prevalence and incidence.围产期抑郁症:患病率和发病率的系统评价
Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Nov;106(5 Pt 1):1071-83. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000183597.31630.db.
9
Is older maternal age a risk factor for preterm birth and fetal growth restriction? A systematic review.高龄孕产妇是早产和胎儿生长受限的危险因素吗?一项系统综述。
Health Care Women Int. 2005 Oct;26(9):852-75. doi: 10.1080/07399330500230912.
10
Explaining disproportionately high rates of adverse birth outcomes among African Americans: the impact of stress, racism, and related factors in pregnancy.解释非裔美国人中不良分娩结局比例过高的原因:压力、种族主义及孕期相关因素的影响
Psychol Bull. 2005 Sep;131(5):662-83. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.131.5.662.