Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Am J Sports Med. 2023 Jul;51(9):2454-2464. doi: 10.1177/03635465231179711.
Glenohumeral joint contact loading before and after glenoid bone grafting for recurrent anterior instability remains poorly understood.
To develop a computational model to evaluate the influence of glenoid bone loss and graft positioning on graft and cartilage contact pressures after the Latarjet procedure.
Controlled laboratory study.
A finite element model of the shoulder was developed using kinematics, muscle and glenohumeral joint loading of 6 male participants. Muscle and joint forces at 90° of abduction and external rotation were calculated and employed in simulations of the native shoulder, as well as the shoulder with a Bankart lesion, 10% and 25% glenoid bone loss, and after the Latarjet procedure.
A Bankart lesion as well as glenoid bone loss of 10% and 25% significantly increased glenoid and humeral cartilage contact pressures compared with the native shoulder ( < .05). The Latarjet procedure did not significantly increase glenoid cartilage contact pressure. With 25% glenoid bone loss, the Latarjet procedure with a graft flush with the glenoid and the humerus positioned at the glenoid half-width resulted in significantly increased humeral cartilage contact pressure compared with that preoperatively ( = .023). Under the same condition, medializing the graft by 1 mm resulted in humeral cartilage contact pressure comparable with that preoperatively ( = .097). Graft lateralization by 1 mm resulted in significantly increased humeral cartilage contact pressure in both glenoid bone loss conditions ( < .05).
This modeling study showed that labral damage and greater glenoid bone loss significantly increased glenoid and humeral cartilage contact pressures in the shoulder. The Latarjet procedure may mitigate this to an extent, although glenoid and humeral contact loading was sensitive to graft placement.
The Latarjet procedure with a correctly positioned graft should not lead to increased glenohumeral joint contact loading. The present study suggests that lateral graft overhang should be avoided, and in the situation of large glenoid bone defects, slight medialization (ie, 1 mm) of the graft may help to mitigate glenohumeral joint contact overloading.
盂肱关节在复发性前向不稳定患者行盂唇骨骨 2 移植术后的接触载荷变化仍知之甚少。
建立计算模型以评估盂唇骨骨 2 移植术后盂肱关节骨量丢失和移植物位置对移植物和软骨接触压力的影响。
对照性实验室研究。
采用 6 名男性参与者的运动学、肌肉和盂肱关节加载参数建立肩部有限元模型。计算并采用在体肩部、Bankart 损伤、10%和 25%盂唇骨丢失以及 Latarjet 术后的肌肉和关节力模拟。
与在体肩部相比,Bankart 损伤和 10%及 25%盂唇骨丢失均显著增加盂肱关节和肱骨头软骨的接触压力(<0.05)。Latarjet 术并未显著增加盂肱关节软骨的接触压力。在 25%盂唇骨丢失时,与术前相比,当移植物与盂肱关节平齐且肱骨头位于盂肱关节半宽时,Latarjet 术后的肱骨头软骨接触压力显著增加(=0.023)。在相同条件下,移植物向内侧移动 1mm 时肱骨头软骨接触压力与术前相似(=0.097)。当移植物向外侧移动 1mm 时,两种盂唇骨丢失情况下的肱骨头软骨接触压力均显著增加(<0.05)。
该模型研究表明,盂唇损伤和较大的盂唇骨丢失显著增加肩部盂肱关节和肱骨头软骨的接触压力。Latarjet 术可能在一定程度上减轻这种情况,但盂肱关节接触载荷对移植物位置敏感。
正确定位的移植物的 Latarjet 术不会导致盂肱关节接触载荷增加。本研究表明应避免移植物外侧突出,在盂唇骨较大缺损的情况下,移植物轻微向内侧移动(即 1mm)可能有助于减轻盂肱关节接触过载。