• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚助产士团队实践中的劳动力:对助产士和管理人员的横断面调查。

Midwifery group practice workforce in Australia: A cross-sectional survey of midwives and managers.

机构信息

School of Nursing and Midwifery Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia.

School of Business Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia.

出版信息

Women Birth. 2024 Feb;37(1):206-214. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2023.09.002. Epub 2023 Sep 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.wombi.2023.09.002
PMID:37726186
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite robust evidence on the benefits of midwifery group practice (MGP), there remains difficulties with implementing and sustaining the model. However, contemporary data on the MGP workforce and how each model has been operationalised are limited. This constrains an understanding of the factors that help or hinder implementation and sustainability of MGP.

AIM

To describe the characteristics of Australian MGPs and the factors that help or hinder sustainability.

METHODS

A national cross-sectional survey was undertaken in Australia between March 2021 and July 2022, inclusive. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive analysis while qualitative data were analysed using content analysis.

FINDINGS

Of 669 survey responses, 579 were midwives and 90 were managers. The mean years of experience for clinical midwives was eight years, and 47.8% (almost twice the national average) completed a Bachelor of Midwifery (BMid). Half (50.2%) the models provided care for women of all risk. Midwives resigned from MGP because of the MGP work conditions (30%) and how the service was managed or supported (12.7%). Managers resigned from MGP because of role changes, conflict with their manager, and limited support. Almost half (42.6%) of MGP managers also managed other areas, leading to heavy workloads, competing demands, and burnout.

CONCLUSION

The BMid appears to be a common educational pathway for MGP midwives, and many MGP services are providing care to women with complexities. Flexible practice agreements, organisational support and appropriate workloads are vital for recruitment, retention, and sustainability of MGP.

摘要

背景

尽管有大量证据表明助产士小组实践(MGP)的益处,但在实施和维持该模式方面仍存在困难。然而,目前关于 MGP 劳动力的数据以及每个模型的运作方式都很有限。这限制了对有助于或阻碍 MGP 实施和可持续性的因素的理解。

目的

描述澳大利亚 MGP 的特征以及有助于或阻碍可持续性的因素。

方法

2021 年 3 月至 2022 年 7 月期间,在澳大利亚进行了一项全国性的横断面调查。使用描述性分析对定量数据进行分析,使用内容分析对定性数据进行分析。

发现

在 669 份调查回复中,有 579 份来自助产士,90 份来自经理。临床助产士的平均工作年限为八年,其中 47.8%(几乎是全国平均水平的两倍)完成了助产学士学位(BMid)。一半(50.2%)的模式为所有风险的女性提供护理。助产士因 MGP 工作条件(30%)和服务管理或支持方式(12.7%)而从 MGP 辞职。经理因角色变化、与经理的冲突以及有限的支持而从 MGP 辞职。几乎一半(42.6%)的 MGP 经理还管理其他领域,导致工作量大、需求竞争激烈和倦怠。

结论

BMid 似乎是 MGP 助产士的常见教育途径,许多 MGP 服务都为复杂性女性提供护理。灵活的实践协议、组织支持和适当的工作量对于 MGP 的招聘、留用和可持续性至关重要。

相似文献

1
Midwifery group practice workforce in Australia: A cross-sectional survey of midwives and managers.澳大利亚助产士团队实践中的劳动力:对助产士和管理人员的横断面调查。
Women Birth. 2024 Feb;37(1):206-214. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2023.09.002. Epub 2023 Sep 17.
2
The sustainability of midwifery group practice: A cross-sectional study of midwives and managers.
Women Birth. 2024 May;37(3):101602. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2024.101602. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
3
Midwife-centred management: a qualitative study of midwifery group practice management and leadership in Australia.以助产士为中心的管理:澳大利亚助产士团队实践管理和领导力的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Sep 26;22(1):1203. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08532-y.
4
Management and sustainability of midwifery group practice: Thematic and lexical analyses of midwife interviews.助产士小组实践的管理和可持续性:对助产士访谈的主题和词汇分析。
Women Birth. 2022 Mar;35(2):172-183. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2021.05.002. Epub 2021 May 26.
5
An evaluation of the satisfaction of midwives' working in midwifery group practice.助产士小组实践中助产士工作满意度评估。
Midwifery. 2010 Aug;26(4):435-41. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2008.09.004. Epub 2009 Sep 24.
6
Midwives' views of caseload midwifery - comparing the caseload and non-caseload midwives' opinions. A cross-sectional survey of Australian midwives.产婆对病例产程助产的看法-比较病例产程助产士和非病例产程助产士的意见。对澳大利亚产婆的横断面调查。
Women Birth. 2021 Feb;34(1):e47-e56. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2020.06.006. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
7
Midwifery workplace culture in Australia: A national survey of midwives.澳大利亚的助产士工作场所文化:一项全国助产士调查。
Women Birth. 2020 Sep;33(5):464-472. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2019.09.008. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
8
Western Australia facing critical losses in its midwifery workforce: a survey of midwives' intentions.西澳大利亚州面临助产士劳动力的严重流失:对助产士意向的调查。
Midwifery. 2013 May;29(5):497-505. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2012.04.006. Epub 2012 Nov 22.
9
An overview of the first 'no exit' midwifery group practice in a tertiary maternity hospital in Western Australia: Outcomes, satisfaction and perceptions of care.西澳大利亚一家三级妇产医院首个“无出院”助产士团队执业情况概述:结局、满意度及护理认知
Women Birth. 2016 Dec;29(6):494-502. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2016.04.009. Epub 2016 May 16.
10
Who is at risk of burnout? A cross-sectional survey of midwives in a tertiary maternity hospital in Melbourne, Australia.谁有倦怠的风险?澳大利亚墨尔本一家三级妇产医院助产士的横断面调查。
Women Birth. 2022 Nov;35(6):e615-e623. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2022.02.010. Epub 2022 Mar 2.