Research Institute, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology.
Research Team for Social Participation and Healthy Aging, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute for Geriatrics and Gerontology.
Psychol Aging. 2023 Nov;38(7):601-614. doi: 10.1037/pag0000778. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
Individual development and aging are shaped by historical changes in sociocultural contexts. Studies indicate that later-born cohorts experience improvements in well-being in the young-old. However, whether this historical trend holds in the old-old remains unknown. Using longitudinal data of Japanese older adults, we examined birth cohort differences in trajectories of well-being as measured by life satisfaction. Data were derived from a nationally representative study conducted from 1987 to 2012. We compared earlier- and later-born cohorts over 10 years in two age groups: the young-old ( = 1,195 per cohort; age 63-74; years of birth: 1913-1924 and 1925-1936) and the old-old ( = 436 per cohort; age 75-86; years of birth: 1901-1912 and 1913-1924). To control for covariates, we used case-matched cohorts based on age and sex. Growth curve models were employed to estimate age-related changes in life satisfaction by age group. At age 75 years, life satisfaction was higher in the later-born cohort than in the earlier-born cohort across age groups. Cohort differences in the rate of change in life satisfaction were absent among the young-old. Among the old-old, the later-born cohort showed steeper declines than the earlier-born cohort. Socioeconomic, social, and health resources did not fully explain the cohort differences in both age groups. Our results suggest that historical improvements in well-being in the young-old do not persist into the old-old. Societal advancements may enable later-born cohorts to survive with limited resources. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
个体的发展和衰老受到社会文化背景中历史变化的影响。研究表明,较晚出生的队列在年轻老年人中幸福感得到改善。然而,这种历史趋势在老年人中是否存在尚不清楚。本研究使用日本老年人的纵向数据,使用生活满意度衡量幸福感的轨迹,检验了出生队列在幸福感方面的差异。数据来自于一项从 1987 年到 2012 年进行的全国代表性研究。我们在两个年龄组中比较了较早和较晚出生的队列:年轻老年人(每个队列 1195 人;年龄 63-74 岁;出生年份:1913-1924 年和 1925-1936 年)和年老老年人(每个队列 436 人;年龄 75-86 岁;出生年份:1901-1912 年和 1913-1924 年)。为了控制协变量,我们根据年龄和性别使用病例匹配的队列。使用增长曲线模型估计年龄组中生活满意度的年龄相关变化。在 75 岁时,在两个年龄组中,较晚出生的队列的生活满意度均高于较早出生的队列。在年轻老年人中,生活满意度变化率的队列差异并不存在。在年老老年人中,较晚出生的队列比较早出生的队列下降得更陡峭。社会经济、社会和健康资源并不能完全解释两个年龄组中出生队列的差异。研究结果表明,年轻老年人幸福感的历史改善并未持续到老年人。社会进步可能使较晚出生的队列在资源有限的情况下生存。