Suppr超能文献

商业蜜蜂和濒危无刺蜂的生存及飞行能力会受到常见农用化学品的损害。

The survival and flight capacity of commercial honeybees and endangered stingless bees are impaired by common agrochemicals.

作者信息

Gomes Ingrid N, Gontijo Lessando Moreira, Lima Maria Augusta Pereira, Zanuncio José Salazar, Resende Helder Canto

机构信息

Programa de Pós Graduação em Manejo e Conservação de Ecossistemas Naturais e Agrários, Universidade Federal de Viçosa - Campus Florestal, Florestal, MG, Brazil.

Laboratório de Genética da Conservação de Abelhas - LaBee. Instituto de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, - Campus Florestal, Florestal, MG, Brazil.

出版信息

Ecotoxicology. 2023 Sep;32(7):937-947. doi: 10.1007/s10646-023-02699-8. Epub 2023 Sep 21.

Abstract

The impact of agrochemicals on native Brazilian bees may be underestimated, since studies of non-target effects on bees have, by and large, concerned mostly the Apis mellifera L. Furthermore, bees may be exposed in the field to multiple agrochemicals through different routes, thus suggesting the necessity for more comprehensive toxicological experiments. Here, we assessed the lethal and sublethal toxicity of multiple agrochemicals (herbicide [glyphosate - Roundup], fungicide [mancozeb], insecticide [thiamethoxam]) through distinct routes of exposure (contact or ingestion) to an endangered native Brazilian bee Melipona (Michmelia) capixaba Moure & Camargo, 1994 and to A. mellifera. Results indicate that none of the agrochemicals caused feeding repellency on the bees. Thiamethoxam caused high mortality of both species, regardless of the route of exposure or the dose used. In addition, thiametoxam altered the flight capacity of M. capixaba when exposed to the lowest dose via contact exposure. The field dose of glyphosate caused high mortality of both bee species after oral exposure as well as impaired the flight capacity of A. mellifera (ingestion exposure) and M. capixaba (contact exposure). The lower dose of glyphosate also impaired the flight of M. capixaba through either routes of exposure. Exposure of A. mellifera through contact and ingestion to both doses of mancozeb caused high mortality and significantly impaired flight capacity. Taken altogether, the results highlight the importance of testing the impact of multiple agrochemicals (i.e. not just insecticides) through different routes of exposure in order to understand more comprehensively the potential risks for Apis and non-Apis bees.

摘要

农用化学品对巴西本土蜜蜂的影响可能被低估了,因为关于蜜蜂非靶标效应的研究总体上大多关注西方蜜蜂。此外,蜜蜂在田间可能通过不同途径接触多种农用化学品,因此有必要开展更全面的毒理学实验。在此,我们通过不同的接触途径(接触或摄入),评估了多种农用化学品(除草剂[草甘膦 - 农达]、杀菌剂[代森锰锌]、杀虫剂[噻虫嗪])对一种濒危的巴西本土蜜蜂——卡皮克萨巴无刺蜂(Melipona (Michmelia) capixaba Moure & Camargo,1994)以及西方蜜蜂的致死和亚致死毒性。结果表明,没有一种农用化学品会引起蜜蜂的拒食反应。噻虫嗪导致两种蜜蜂的高死亡率,无论接触途径或使用剂量如何。此外,当通过接触途径暴露于最低剂量的噻虫嗪时,它会改变卡皮克萨巴无刺蜂的飞行能力。草甘膦的田间剂量在经口暴露后导致两种蜜蜂的高死亡率,同时损害了西方蜜蜂(摄入暴露)和卡皮克萨巴无刺蜂(接触暴露)的飞行能力。较低剂量的草甘膦也会通过两种接触途径损害卡皮克萨巴无刺蜂的飞行能力。西方蜜蜂通过接触和摄入两种剂量的代森锰锌均导致高死亡率,并显著损害飞行能力。综上所述,这些结果凸显了通过不同接触途径测试多种农用化学品(即不仅仅是杀虫剂)影响的重要性,以便更全面地了解西方蜜蜂和非西方蜜蜂面临的潜在风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验