Departments of Ophthalmology (KMM, VB, NJN, AMF, WC, MD), Neurology (VB, NJN), and Neurological Surgery (NJN), Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
J Neuroophthalmol. 2024 Sep 1;44(3):350-354. doi: 10.1097/WNO.0000000000001915. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
Optometrists are often the first providers to evaluate patients with acute vision loss and are often the first to diagnose a central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO). How quickly these patients present to the optometrist, are diagnosed, and referred for evaluation are major factors influencing the possibility of acute therapeutic intervention. Our aim was to survey the U.S. optometric community to determine current optometric practice patterns for management of CRAO.
An anonymous seven-question survey was emailed in 2020 to the 5,101 members of the American Academy of Optometry and the 26,502 members of the American Optometric Association.
Of 31,603 optometrists who were sent the survey, 1,926 responded (6.1%). Most respondents (1,392/1,919, 72.5%) worked in an optometry-predominant outpatient clinic and were less than 30 minutes from a certified stroke center (1,481/1,923, 77.0%). Ninety-eight percent (1,884/1,922) of respondents had diagnosed less than 5 CRAOs in the previous year, and 1,000/1,922 (52.0%) had not diagnosed a CRAO in the prior year. Of the optometrists who diagnosed at least one CRAO in the previous year, 661/922 (71.7%) evaluated these patients more than 4 hours after the onset of vision loss. Optometrists who diagnosed a CRAO or branch retinal artery occlusion referred patients to an emergency department (ED) affiliated with a certified stroke center (844/1,917, 44.0%), an outpatient ophthalmology clinic (764/1,917, 39.9%), an ED without a stroke center (250/1,917, 13.0%), an outpatient neurology clinic (20/1,917, 1.0%), or other (39/1,917, 2.0%); most (22/39, 56.4%) who responded "other" would refer to a primary care physician.
Optometrists are likely the first providers to evaluate patients with acute vision loss, including from a retinal artery occlusion. However, only 6.1% of optometrists responded to our survey despite 2 reminder emails, likely reflecting the lack of exposure to acute retinal artery occlusions, and a potential lack of interest of optometrists in participating in research. Of the optometrists who reported evaluating a CRAO in the previous year, less than 29% saw the patient within 4 hours of vision loss. In addition, a large portion of optometrists are referring acute CRAO patients to outpatient ophthalmology clinics, delaying appropriate acute management. Therefore, it is imperative that optometrists and ophthalmologists are educated to view acute retinal arterial ischemia as an acute stroke and urgently refer these patients to an ED affiliated with a stroke center. The delay in patient presentation and these referral patterns make future clinical trials for acute CRAO challenging.
视光师通常是评估急性视力丧失患者的首批医疗服务提供者,并且通常是诊断视网膜中央动脉阻塞(CRAO)的首批医生。患者向视光师就诊的速度、诊断和转介评估的速度是影响急性治疗干预可能性的主要因素。我们的目的是调查美国视光师群体,以确定当前管理 CRAO 的视光实践模式。
2020 年,我们向美国视光学院的 5101 名成员和美国视光协会的 26502 名成员发送了一份匿名的七项问题调查。
在收到调查的 31603 名视光师中,有 1926 名(6.1%)做出了回应。大多数受访者(1392/1919,72.5%)在以视光为主的门诊诊所工作,距离经认证的卒中中心不到 30 分钟(1481/1923,77.0%)。98%(1884/1922)的受访者在过去一年中诊断的 CRAO 少于 5 例,而 1000/1922(52.0%)在过去一年中未诊断出 CRAO。在过去一年中诊断出至少一例 CRAO 的视光师中,有 661/922(71.7%)在视力丧失后超过 4 小时对这些患者进行了评估。诊断出 CRAO 或分支视网膜动脉阻塞的视光师将患者转介至经认证的卒中中心附属的急诊部(844/1917,44.0%)、门诊眼科诊所(764/1917,39.9%)、无卒中中心的急诊部(250/1917,13.0%)、门诊神经内科诊所(20/1917,1.0%)或其他(39/1917,2.0%);大多数(22/39,56.4%)回复“其他”的视光师将转介给初级保健医生。
视光师可能是评估急性视力丧失患者(包括视网膜动脉阻塞患者)的首批医疗服务提供者。然而,尽管发送了 2 封提醒电子邮件,但只有 6.1%的视光师回复了我们的调查,这可能反映出他们对急性视网膜动脉阻塞的接触较少,以及视光师对参与研究的潜在兴趣不足。在报告过去一年评估过 CRAO 的视光师中,不到 29%的视光师在视力丧失后 4 小时内看到了患者。此外,很大一部分视光师将急性 CRAO 患者转介至门诊眼科诊所,延迟了适当的急性治疗。因此,视光师和眼科医生必须接受教育,将急性视网膜动脉缺血视为急性中风,并紧急将这些患者转介至卒中中心附属的急诊部。患者就诊时间的延迟和这些转介模式使得未来对急性 CRAO 的临床试验具有挑战性。