Suppr超能文献

气泡在曝气过程中控制病毒气溶胶的释放。

Bubble manipulates the release of viral aerosols in aeration.

作者信息

Chen Menghao, Xing Yingying, Kong Jiayang, Wang Dongbin, Lu Yun

机构信息

State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, State Environment Protection Key Laboratory of Microorganism Application and Risk Control, School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.

State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, State Environment Protection Key Laboratory of Microorganism Application and Risk Control, School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.

出版信息

J Hazard Mater. 2024 Jan 5;461:132534. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.132534. Epub 2023 Sep 12.

Abstract

Bubble bursting is a common phenomenon in many industrial and natural processes, plays an important role in mediating mass transfer across the water-air interface. But the interplay between bubbles and pathogens remains unclear and the mechanisms of virus aerosolization by the bubble properties have not been well studied. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the water-to-air transfer of viruses by bubbles of different sizes. Unlike the dominant view of smaller bubbles less bioaerosols, it was found that the smaller bubbles could generate significantly more viral aerosols regardless of the virus species (Phi6, MS2, PhiX174, and T7), when the Sauter mean bubble diameters were between 0.56 and 1.65 mm under constant aeration flow rate. The mechanism studies denied the possibilities of more aerosols or better dispersion of viruses in the aerosols generated by the smaller bubbles. However, deeper bubbling could transfer more viruses to the air for MS2, PhiX174, and T7. Their concentrations in aerosols were linearly related to the bubbling depth for these non-enveloped viruses, which demonstrates the bubble-scavenging effect as a main mechanism except for the enveloped virus Phi6. Whereas, unlike these three non-enveloped viruses, Phi6 could survive relatively better in the aerosols generated from the smaller bubbles, though the enhancement of aerosolization by the smaller bubbles was much larger than the improvement of survival. Other mechanisms still remain unknown for this enveloped virus. This study suggests that the attempt of decreasing the bubble size in aeration tank of the wastewater treatment plant might significantly increase the solubility of oxygen as well as the risk of viral aerosols.

摘要

气泡破裂是许多工业和自然过程中的常见现象,在介导水 - 空气界面的传质过程中起着重要作用。但气泡与病原体之间的相互作用仍不清楚,且气泡特性导致病毒气溶胶化的机制尚未得到充分研究。本研究的主要目的是评估不同大小气泡对病毒的水 - 空气转移情况。与较小气泡产生较少生物气溶胶的主流观点不同,研究发现,在恒定曝气流量下,当索特平均气泡直径在0.56至1.65毫米之间时,无论病毒种类(Phi6、MS2、PhiX174和T7)如何,较小的气泡都能产生显著更多的病毒气溶胶。机制研究排除了较小气泡产生更多气溶胶或使病毒在气溶胶中更好分散的可能性。然而,对于MS2、PhiX174和T7而言,更深的气泡破裂可将更多病毒转移到空气中。这些非包膜病毒在气溶胶中的浓度与气泡破裂深度呈线性相关,这表明除包膜病毒Phi6外,气泡清除效应是主要机制。与这三种非包膜病毒不同,Phi6在较小气泡产生的气溶胶中能相对更好地存活,尽管较小气泡增强气溶胶化的程度远大于其提高存活率的程度。对于这种包膜病毒,其他机制仍然未知。本研究表明,在污水处理厂曝气池中减小气泡尺寸的尝试可能会显著提高氧气的溶解度以及病毒气溶胶的风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验