Suppr超能文献

氢吗啡酮与吗啡皮下患者自控镇痛治疗中重度癌痛的随机双盲对照研究。

Patient Controlled Subcutaneous Analgesia of Hydromorphone Versus Morphine to Treat Moderate and Severe Cancer Pain: A Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial.

机构信息

Department of Pain Management (X.Z, J.L., Li.S., H.L.), West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Department of Thoracic Oncology (J.Z.), West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China; Department of Medical Oncology (J.Z.), Shangjin Nanfu Hospital, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2024 Jan;67(1):50-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.09.018. Epub 2023 Sep 23.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Hydromorphone and morphine are the common drugs used for the treatment of moderate to severe cancer pain. Patient controlled subcutaneous analgesia (PCSA) is an effective technique to manage cancer pain. However, few studies have been conducted to show the efficacy and safety of PCSA of hydromorphone for the relief of cancer pain.

OBJECTIVES

To explore the short-term efficacy and safety of PCSA elicited by hydromorphone for moderate to severe cancer pain.

METHODS

This was a single-center, randomized, active-controlled, double-blind trial (from April 2019 to August 2021). Sixty patients with moderate to severe cancer pain were randomized (1:1) to hydromorphone or morphine groups according to drug delivery by PCSA. The primary outcome was the pain intensity measured by a numerical rating scale (NRS) at 72 hours. Secondary outcomes included pain intensity measured by NRS at baseline, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, two hours, eight hours, 24 hours and 48 hours. The daily occurrence of breakthrough pain (BTP), impact of pain on quality of life measured by the brief pain inventory (BPI), the daily additional consumption of opioids and the incidence of adverse events were also recorded. Adverse events included nausea, vomiting, dizziness, constipation and respiratory depression.

RESULTS

A total of 57 patients (28 patients in the hydromorphone group and 29 patients in the morphine group) in the West China Hospital of Sichuan University were investigated. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) NRS in the two groups at baseline was 7.8 (1.7) in the hydromorphone group and 7.6 (1.7) in the morphine group, and at 72 hours were 3.4 (1.8) and 3.2 (1.5), respectively. The postoperative NRS in both groups was decreased significantly compared to baseline. The mean (SD) NRS at 30 minutes in the hydromorphone group was significantly lower than in the morphine group (3.9 [2.6] vs. 5.3 [2.1], P = 0.035). The daily occurrence of BTP in both groups at 48 hours and 72 hours decreased significantly compared to the corresponding baseline (P < 0.05), and there was no significant difference between the two groups. The total scores and sub-item scores of BPI at 24 hours and 72 hours after PCSA in both groups decreased significantly from baseline. A comparison of daily additional consumption of opioids between the two groups revealed no statistically significant difference. There were no significant differences in the incidences of nausea, vomiting, dizziness or constipation between the two groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study found that the PCSA of both hydromorphone and morphine could effectively and safely relieve short-term moderate to severe cancer pain. Of note, the PCSA of hydromorphone took effect more quickly than that of morphine.

摘要

背景

氢吗啡酮和吗啡是治疗中重度癌痛的常用药物。患者自控皮下镇痛(PCSA)是一种有效管理癌痛的技术。然而,很少有研究表明氢吗啡酮 PCSA 缓解癌痛的疗效和安全性。

目的

探讨氢吗啡酮 PCSA 治疗中重度癌痛的短期疗效和安全性。

方法

这是一项单中心、随机、阳性对照、双盲试验(2019 年 4 月至 2021 年 8 月)。根据 PCSA 给药,将 60 例中重度癌痛患者随机(1:1)分为氢吗啡酮或吗啡组。主要结局为 72 小时时数字评分量表(NRS)测量的疼痛强度。次要结局包括基线、15 分钟、30 分钟、2 小时、8 小时、24 小时和 48 小时时 NRS 测量的疼痛强度。还记录了每日爆发性疼痛(BTP)的发生、疼痛对生活质量的影响(简明疼痛量表,BPI)、每日额外阿片类药物消耗和不良反应的发生情况。不良反应包括恶心、呕吐、头晕、便秘和呼吸抑制。

结果

四川大学华西医院共纳入 57 例患者(氢吗啡酮组 28 例,吗啡组 29 例)。两组基线时 NRS 的均值(标准差)分别为氢吗啡酮组 7.8(1.7)和吗啡组 7.6(1.7),72 小时时分别为 3.4(1.8)和 3.2(1.5)。两组术后 NRS 均较基线显著下降。氢吗啡酮组 30 分钟时的 NRS 均值明显低于吗啡组(3.9[2.6]比 5.3[2.1],P=0.035)。两组在 48 小时和 72 小时的每日 BTP 发生率均较相应基线显著下降(P<0.05),且两组间无显著差异。两组 PCSA 后 24 小时和 72 小时的 BPI 总分和各分项评分均较基线显著下降。两组每日额外阿片类药物消耗比较无统计学差异。两组恶心、呕吐、头晕或便秘发生率无显著差异(P>0.05)。

结论

本研究发现氢吗啡酮和吗啡的 PCSA 均可有效、安全地缓解短期中重度癌痛。值得注意的是,氢吗啡酮 PCSA 的起效速度快于吗啡。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验