Ondrusova Beata, Tino Peter, Svehlikova Jana
Institute of Measurement Science, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Front Physiol. 2023 Sep 7;14:1264690. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1264690. eCollection 2023.
The inverse problem of electrocardiography noninvasively localizes the origin of undesired cardiac activity, such as a premature ventricular contraction (PVC), from potential recordings from multiple torso electrodes. However, the optimal number and placement of electrodes for an accurate solution of the inverse problem remain undetermined. This study presents a two-step inverse solution for a single dipole cardiac source, which investigates the significance of the torso electrodes on a patient-specific level. Furthermore, the impact of the significant electrodes on the accuracy of the inverse solution is studied. Body surface potential recordings from 128 electrodes of 13 patients with PVCs and their corresponding homogeneous and inhomogeneous torso models were used. The inverse problem using a single dipole was solved in two steps: First, using information from all electrodes, and second, using a subset of electrodes sorted in descending order according to their significance estimated by a greedy algorithm. The significance of electrodes was computed for three criteria derived from the singular values of the transfer matrix that correspond to the inversely estimated origin of the PVC computed in the first step. The localization error (LE) was computed as the Euclidean distance between the ground truth and the inversely estimated origin of the PVC. The LE obtained using the 32 and 64 most significant electrodes was compared to the LE obtained when all 128 electrodes were used for the inverse solution. The average LE calculated for both torso models and using all 128 electrodes was 28.8 ± 11.9 mm. For the three tested criteria, the average LEs were 32.6 ± 19.9 mm, 29.6 ± 14.7 mm, and 28.8 ± 14.5 mm when 32 electrodes were used. When 64 electrodes were used, the average LEs were 30.1 ± 16.8 mm, 29.4 ± 12.0 mm, and 29.5 ± 12.6 mm. The study found inter-patient variability in the significance of torso electrodes and demonstrated that an accurate localization by the inverse solution with a single dipole could be achieved using a carefully selected reduced number of electrodes.
心电图逆问题旨在通过多个躯干电极记录的电位来无创定位异常心脏活动(如室性早搏,PVC)的起源。然而,对于准确求解逆问题而言,电极的最佳数量和放置位置仍未确定。本研究提出了一种针对单偶极心脏源的两步逆解方法,该方法在患者个体层面上研究了躯干电极的重要性。此外,还研究了重要电极对逆解准确性的影响。使用了13例患有PVC患者的128电极体表电位记录以及相应的均匀和非均匀躯干模型。单偶极逆问题分两步求解:首先,使用所有电极的信息;其次,使用根据贪心算法估计的重要性按降序排列的电极子集。根据第一步计算出的PVC逆估计起源对应的传递矩阵奇异值得出的三个标准来计算电极的重要性。定位误差(LE)计算为真实起源与PVC逆估计起源之间的欧几里得距离。将使用32个和64个最重要电极时获得的LE与使用全部128个电极进行逆解时获得的LE进行比较。对于两种躯干模型并使用全部128个电极计算得出的平均LE为28.8±11.9毫米。对于三个测试标准,使用32个电极时平均LE分别为32.6±19.9毫米、29.6±14.7毫米和28.8±14.5毫米。使用64个电极时,平均LE分别为30.1±16.8毫米, 29.4±12.0毫米和29.5±12.6毫米。该研究发现患者之间躯干电极的重要性存在差异,并表明使用精心挑选的减少数量的电极,通过单偶极逆解可以实现准确的定位。