Zhuang Xianxian, Lin Jiating, Dong Hao, Wen Yin, Xian Ruoting, Cheng Lu, Wu Jingyi, Li Shaobing
Center of Oral Implantology, Stomatological Hospital, School of Stomatology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2024 Feb;26(1):216-225. doi: 10.1111/cid.13281. Epub 2023 Sep 26.
To evaluate the clinical outcome of the transalveolar approach with the small segmentation method for inclined maxillary sinus floor elevation.
Sixty-one patients with an inclined maxillary sinus floor (tilt angle ≥ 10°) and insufficient residual bone height in the posterior maxilla were included and grouped according to the tilt angle of the sinus floor, with group A having patients with the tilt angle ≥ 10° and ≤ 30° and group B having patients with the tilt angle > 30°. After completing sinus membrane elevation and bone augmentation using bone substitute materials, the implants were inserted at the same appointment, and the restoration was completed after 5-6 months of osseointegration. The preoperative sinus floor level and sinus floor elevation achieved postoperatively were assessed and recorded. At pre- and post-operative timepoints, the sagittal plane of the cone beam computed tomography was used to evaluate the bone height changes at the peak, middle and valley points in the slope segment intended for implant implantation.
Osseointegration was evident in all 61 patients, and the final restoration was completed with functional loading. After assessing the normality and homogeneity of variance, two-sample t-test or nonparametric tests were employed to estimate the differences in the bone height changes. The degrees of freedom (df) for this analysis were 59. The elevation attained at the middle point in groups A and B were 6.71 ± 1.38 and 5.75 ± 1.56 mm, respectively, demonstrating a significant difference (p < 0.05). Furthermore, at the peak and valley points, group A exhibited bone height changes of 5.79 ± 1.74 and 6.06 ± 1.45 mm, respectively, compared to group B with changes measuring 4.63 ± 2.18 and 5.58 ± 2.39 mm, respectively, with no significant difference in the two groups (p ≥ 0.05). The prevalence of intraoperative sinus membrane perforation was assessed using the chi-square test. It was found that four cases in group A and five cases in group B experienced sinus membrane perforation, with no significant difference in the two groups (p ≥ 0.05, df = 1).
The transalveolar approach using the small segmentation method suggests a promising approach for elevating the inclined maxillary sinus floor.
评估采用小分割法经牙槽嵴入路进行上颌窦底倾斜提升术的临床效果。
纳入61例上颌窦底倾斜(倾斜角度≥10°)且上颌后牙区剩余骨高度不足的患者,根据窦底倾斜角度分组,A组患者的倾斜角度≥10°且≤30°,B组患者的倾斜角度>30°。在完成窦膜提升及使用骨替代材料进行骨增量后,同期植入种植体,并在骨整合5 - 6个月后完成修复。评估并记录术前窦底水平及术后实现的窦底提升量。在术前和术后时间点,使用锥形束计算机断层扫描的矢状面评估种植体植入区域斜坡段的峰值、中点和谷值处的骨高度变化。
61例患者均实现骨整合,并完成了功能负重的最终修复。在评估方差的正态性和齐性后,采用两样本t检验或非参数检验来估计骨高度变化的差异。该分析的自由度(df)为59。A组和B组中点处实现的提升量分别为6.71±1.38和5.75±1.56mm,差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。此外,在峰值和谷值处,A组的骨高度变化分别为5.79±1.74和6.06±1.45mm,B组分别为4.63±2.18和5.58±2.39mm,两组差异无统计学意义(p≥0.05)。采用卡方检验评估术中窦膜穿孔的发生率。发现A组有4例、B组有5例发生窦膜穿孔,两组差异无统计学意义(p≥0.05,df = 1)。
采用小分割法的经牙槽嵴入路为上颌窦底倾斜提升提供了一种有前景的方法。