Suppr超能文献

Bodipy电子激发态的最佳模型:将各种密度泛函理论(DFT)泛函的预测结果与飞秒受激拉曼光谱的测量结果进行比较。

The Best Models of Bodipy's Electronic Excited State: Comparing Predictions from Various DFT Functionals with Measurements from Femtosecond Stimulated Raman Spectroscopy.

作者信息

Sandoval Juan S, McCamant David W

机构信息

Department of Chemistry, University of Rochester, 120 Trustee Road, Rochester, New York 14627, United States.

出版信息

J Phys Chem A. 2023 Oct 5;127(39):8238-8251. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpca.3c05040. Epub 2023 Sep 26.

Abstract

Density functional theory (DFT) and time-dependent DFT (TD-DFT) are pivotal approaches for modeling electronically excited states of molecules. However, choosing a DFT exchange-correlation functional (XCF) among the myriad of alternatives is an overwhelming task that can affect the interpretation of results and lead to erroneous conclusions. The performance of these XCFs to describe the excited-state properties is often addressed by comparing them with high-level wave function methods or experimentally available vertical excitation energies; however, this is a limited analysis that relies on evaluation of a single point in the excited-state potential energy surface (PES). Different strategies have been proposed but are limited by the difficulty of experimentally accessing the electronic excited-state properties. In this work, we have tested the performance of 12 different XCFs and TD-DFT to describe the excited-state potential energy surface of Bodipy (2,6-diethyl-1,3,5,7-tetramethyl-8-phenyldipyrromethene difluoroborate). We compare those results with resonance Raman spectra collected by using femtosecond stimulated Raman spectroscopy (FSRS). By simultaneously fitting the absorption spectrum, fluorescence spectrum, and all of the resonance Raman excitation profiles within the independent mode displaced harmonic oscillator (IMDHO) formalism, we can describe the PES at the Franck-Condon (FC) region and determine the solvent and intramolecular reorganization energy after relaxation. This allows a direct comparison of the TD-DFT output with experimental observables. Our analysis reveals that using vertical absorption energies might not be a good criterion to determine the best XCF for a given molecular system and that FSRS opens up a new way to benchmark the excited-state performance of XCFs of fluorescent dyes.

摘要

密度泛函理论(DFT)和含时密度泛函理论(TD-DFT)是模拟分子电子激发态的关键方法。然而,在众多可供选择的DFT交换相关泛函(XCF)中进行选择是一项艰巨的任务,这可能会影响结果的解释并导致错误的结论。这些XCF描述激发态性质的性能通常通过将它们与高水平波函数方法或实验可得的垂直激发能进行比较来评估;然而,这是一种有限的分析,依赖于对激发态势能面(PES)上单个点的评估。已经提出了不同的策略,但受到实验获取电子激发态性质难度的限制。在这项工作中,我们测试了12种不同的XCF和TD-DFT描述Bodipy(2,6-二乙基-1,3,5,7-四甲基-8-苯基二吡咯亚甲基二氟硼酸盐)激发态势能面的性能。我们将这些结果与使用飞秒受激拉曼光谱(FSRS)收集的共振拉曼光谱进行比较。通过在独立模式位移谐振子(IMDHO)形式体系内同时拟合吸收光谱、荧光光谱和所有共振拉曼激发谱,我们可以描述弗兰克-康登(FC)区域的PES,并确定弛豫后的溶剂和分子内重组能。这使得能够直接将TD-DFT的输出与实验可观测量进行比较。我们的分析表明,使用垂直吸收能可能不是确定给定分子体系最佳XCF的良好标准,并且FSRS为基准测试荧光染料XCF的激发态性能开辟了一条新途径。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验