Department of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849.
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2023 Dec;22(4):ar36. doi: 10.1187/cbe.22-11-0225.
Student-study behaviors and metacognition are predictors of student-academic success. However, student metacognitive evaluation of their own study habit behavior use has been largely unexplored. To address this gap, we gave students enrolled in three different Biology courses ( = 1140) a survey that asked them to identify the study behaviors used to prepare for their first and third exams and to appraise the effectiveness of each behavior. We observed that, across all courses, students used different counts of active- and passive-study behaviors. However, there were no differences in performance across courses, and the use of effective (i.e., active) study behaviors resulted in improved exam performance for all students, regardless of course, while the use of ineffective (i.e., passive) study behaviors had no significant impact on exam performance. Finally, our qualitative analysis revealed that students across all courses demonstrated similar ability in identifying effective-study behaviors, but students could not explain why those behaviors were effective. Taken together, our study demonstrates that students use various study behaviors to prepare for exams without understanding their effectiveness. We encourage instructors to structure their courses to promote the development of metacognitive evaluation and effective-study behaviors.
学生的学习行为和元认知是学生学业成功的预测因素。然而,学生对自己学习习惯行为的元认知评价在很大程度上尚未得到探索。为了解决这一差距,我们让三个不同生物学课程的学生(n=1140)填写了一份调查问卷,要求他们确定为准备第一次和第三次考试而使用的学习行为,并评价每种行为的有效性。我们发现,在所有课程中,学生使用的主动学习和被动学习行为数量不同。然而,不同课程之间的表现没有差异,所有学生使用有效的(即主动的)学习行为会提高考试成绩,而使用无效的(即被动的)学习行为对考试成绩没有显著影响。最后,我们的定性分析表明,所有课程的学生在识别有效学习行为方面表现出相似的能力,但学生无法解释为什么这些行为是有效的。总的来说,我们的研究表明,学生在准备考试时使用各种学习行为,但不了解这些行为的有效性。我们鼓励教师构建课程,以促进元认知评价和有效学习行为的发展。