• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

减少恶性胸腔积液患者的住院人数:一项质量改进研究。

Reducing hospital admissions in patients with malignant pleural effusion: a quality improvement study.

机构信息

Pulmonary, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA

Pulmonary, The University of Tennessee Medical Center, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Sep;12(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002197.

DOI:10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002197
PMID:37751941
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10533796/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Malignant pleural effusions (MPE) can cause severe dyspnoea leading to greater than 125 000 hospitalisations per year and cost greater than US$5 billion per year in the USA. Timely insertion of tunnelled pleural catheters (TPCs) is associated with fewer inpatient days and emergency department visits. We conducted a quality improvement study to reduce hospital admissions of patients with MPE.

METHODS

Key stakeholders were surveyed, including thoracic and breast oncology teams, general pulmonary and interventional pulmonology (IP) to help identify the underlying causes and solutions. Our preintervention group consisted of 51 patients who underwent TPC placement by our IP service. In our first intervention, we reviewed referrals for MPE with the scheduling team and triaged them based on urgency. In the second intervention, we added a follow-up phone call 1 week after the initial thoracentesis performed by IP to assess for the recurrence of symptoms.

RESULTS

Demographic and clinical characteristics were summarised across the three groups. We evaluated the rate ratio (RR) of admissions in the intervention groups with the multivariable Poisson regression and adjusted for race, gender and cancer. Compared with the preintervention group, intervention I showed trends towards a 41% lower hospital admission rate (RR 0.59 (0.33-1.07), p=0.11). Compared with the preintervention group, intervention II showed trends towards a 40% lower hospital admission rate (RR 0.6 (0.36-0.99), p=0.07). The results did not reach statistical significance. Exploratory comparisons in readmission rates between interventions I and II showed no difference (RR 0.89 (0.43-1.79), p=0.75).

CONCLUSIONS

Both interventions showed trends toward fewer hospital readmissions although they were not statistically significant. Larger-size prospective studies would be needed to demonstrate the continued effectiveness of these interventions.

摘要

背景

恶性胸腔积液(MPE)可导致严重呼吸困难,每年导致超过 125000 人次住院,在美国每年花费超过 50 亿美元。及时插入经皮胸膜导管(TPC)可减少住院天数和急诊就诊次数。我们进行了一项质量改进研究,以减少 MPE 患者的住院人数。

方法

对包括胸科和乳腺肿瘤团队、普通肺科和介入肺科(IP)在内的关键利益相关者进行了调查,以帮助确定潜在的原因和解决方案。我们的预干预组包括 51 名由我们的 IP 服务进行 TPC 放置的患者。在我们的第一次干预中,我们与调度团队一起审查了 MPE 的转诊,并根据紧急程度对其进行了分类。在第二次干预中,我们在 IP 进行初始胸腔穿刺后 1 周增加了随访电话,以评估症状是否复发。

结果

在三组中总结了人口统计学和临床特征。我们使用多变量泊松回归评估了干预组的入院率比值(RR),并调整了种族、性别和癌症因素。与预干预组相比,干预 I 显示出住院率降低 41%的趋势(RR 0.59(0.33-1.07),p=0.11)。与预干预组相比,干预 II 显示出住院率降低 40%的趋势(RR 0.6(0.36-0.99),p=0.07)。结果未达到统计学意义。干预 I 和 II 之间的再入院率的探索性比较显示无差异(RR 0.89(0.43-1.79),p=0.75)。

结论

尽管这两种干预措施都显示出住院人数减少的趋势,但没有达到统计学意义。需要更大规模的前瞻性研究来证明这些干预措施的持续有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c50/10533796/c74568e02026/bmjoq-2022-002197f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c50/10533796/713e9ebcd121/bmjoq-2022-002197f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c50/10533796/c74568e02026/bmjoq-2022-002197f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c50/10533796/713e9ebcd121/bmjoq-2022-002197f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c50/10533796/c74568e02026/bmjoq-2022-002197f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Reducing hospital admissions in patients with malignant pleural effusion: a quality improvement study.减少恶性胸腔积液患者的住院人数:一项质量改进研究。
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Sep;12(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002197.
2
Procedures Performed during Hospitalizations for Malignant Pleural Effusions: Data from the 2012 National Inpatient Sample.恶性胸腔积液住院期间的操作:来自 2012 年国家住院患者样本的数据。
Respiration. 2018;95(4):228-234. doi: 10.1159/000485934. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
3
Healthcare Costs and Utilization among Patients Hospitalized for Malignant Pleural Effusion.恶性胸腔积液住院患者的医疗费用和利用情况。
Respiration. 2020;99(3):257-263. doi: 10.1159/000506210. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
4
Thoracoscopic talc versus tunneled pleural catheters for palliation of malignant pleural effusions.胸腔镜滑石粉与隧道式胸腔引流管治疗恶性胸腔积液的姑息疗效比较。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Oct;94(4):1053-7; discussion 1057-9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.01.103. Epub 2012 Apr 17.
5
Single-center experience with 250 tunnelled pleural catheter insertions for malignant pleural effusion.针对恶性胸腔积液进行250次隧道式胸腔导管插入术的单中心经验。
Chest. 2006 Feb;129(2):362-368. doi: 10.1378/chest.129.2.362.
6
Indwelling pleural catheters reduce inpatient days over pleurodesis for malignant pleural effusion.留置胸腔导管可减少恶性胸腔积液行胸膜固定术的住院天数。
Chest. 2012 Aug;142(2):394-400. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-2657.
7
Professional, structural and organisational interventions in primary care for reducing medication errors.在初级保健中采取专业、结构和组织干预措施以减少用药错误。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 4;10(10):CD003942. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003942.pub3.
8
Quality Gaps and Comparative Effectiveness of Management Strategies for Recurrent Malignant Pleural Effusions.复发性恶性胸腔积液管理策略的质量差距和比较效果。
Chest. 2018 Feb;153(2):438-452. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.08.026. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
9
The significance of thoracoscopic mechanical pleurodesis for the treatment of malignant pleural effusions.胸腔镜机械性胸膜固定术治疗恶性胸腔积液的意义
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2004;116 Suppl 2:28-32.
10
The impact of tunneled pleural catheters on the quality of life of patients with malignant pleural effusions.经皮胸腔引流管对恶性胸腔积液患者生活质量的影响。
Respiration. 2013;85(1):36-42. doi: 10.1159/000342343. Epub 2012 Nov 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictive model for sarcopenia in patients with non-small cell lung cancer and malignant pleural effusion.非小细胞肺癌合并恶性胸腔积液患者肌肉减少症的预测模型
BMC Cancer. 2025 Feb 25;25(1):350. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-13772-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving patient care in neurosurgery through postoperative telephone calls: a systematic review and lessons from all surgical specialties.通过术后电话提高神经外科学患者护理质量:一项系统评价以及所有外科专业的经验教训。
Neurosurg Focus. 2021 Nov;51(5):E5. doi: 10.3171/2021.8.FOCUS21410.
2
Review of referrals reveal the impact of referral content on the triage and management of ophthalmology wait lists.转诊审查揭示了转诊内容对眼科候诊名单的分诊和管理的影响。
BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 7;11(9):e047246. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047246.
3
Therapeutic thoracentesis symptoms and activity: a qualitative study.
治疗性胸腔穿刺术的症状与活动:一项定性研究
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2023 Oct;13(e1):e190-e196. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002584. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
4
Early Readmission to Hospital in Patients With Cancer With Malignant Pleural Effusions: Analysis of the Nationwide Readmissions Database.癌症合并恶性胸腔积液患者的早期住院再入院:全国再入院数据库分析。
Chest. 2020 Feb;157(2):435-445. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.09.007. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
5
Quality of life after interventions for malignant pleural effusions: a systematic review.恶性胸腔积液干预治疗后的生活质量:系统评价。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2020 Mar;10(1):45-54. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2018-001610. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
6
Patient- and Hospital-Level Factors Associated With Readmission for Malignant Pleural Effusion.患者和医院相关因素与恶性胸腔积液再入院相关。
J Oncol Pract. 2018 Sep;14(9):e547-e556. doi: 10.1200/JOP.18.00201. Epub 2018 Aug 15.
7
A Multidisciplinary QI Initiative to Improve OR-ICU Handovers.一项旨在改善手术室与重症监护病房交接的多学科质量改进计划。
Am J Nurs. 2018 Feb;118(2):48-59. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000530248.45711.60.
8
Quality Gaps and Comparative Effectiveness of Management Strategies for Recurrent Malignant Pleural Effusions.复发性恶性胸腔积液管理策略的质量差距和比较效果。
Chest. 2018 Feb;153(2):438-452. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.08.026. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
9
Cost-effectiveness of indwelling pleural catheter compared with talc in malignant pleural effusion.与滑石粉相比,留置胸膜导管治疗恶性胸腔积液的成本效益分析。
Respirology. 2017 May;22(4):764-770. doi: 10.1111/resp.12962. Epub 2016 Dec 16.
10
US Hospitalizations for Malignant Pleural Effusions: Data From the 2012 National Inpatient Sample.美国恶性胸腔积液住院情况:来自2012年全国住院患者样本的数据。
Chest. 2017 Apr;151(4):845-854. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.11.010. Epub 2016 Nov 19.