• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项评估抗生素囊袋冲洗在组织扩张器乳房重建中应用效果的前瞻性随机临床试验。

A prospective randomized clinical trial to assess antibiotic pocket irrigation on tissue expander breast reconstruction.

作者信息

Walker Jennifer N, Hanson Blake M, Hunter Tayler, Simar Shelby R, Duran Ramirez Jesus M, Obernuefemann Chloe L P, Parikh Rajiv P, Tenenbaum Marissa M, Margenthaler Julie A, Hultgren Scott J, Myckatyn Terence M

机构信息

Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Sciences Center , Houston, Texas, USA.

Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics & Environmental Sciences, Center for Infectious Diseases, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Sciences Center , Houston, Texas, USA.

出版信息

Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Sep 27;11(5):e0143023. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01430-23.

DOI:10.1128/spectrum.01430-23
PMID:37754546
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10581127/
Abstract

Bacterial infection is the most common complication following staged post-mastectomy breast reconstruction initiated with a tissue expander (TE). To limit bacterial infection, antibiotic irrigation of the surgical site is commonly performed despite little high-quality data to support this practice. We performed a prospective randomized control trial to compare the impact of saline irrigation alone to a triple antibiotic irrigation regimen (1 g cefazolin, 80 mg gentamicin, and 50,000 units of bacitracin in 500 mL of saline) for breast implant surgery. The microbiome in breasts with cancer ( = 16) was compared to those without ( = 16), as all patients ( = 16) had unilateral cancers but bilateral mastectomies ( = 32). Biologic and prosthetic specimens procured both at the time of mastectomy and during TE removal months later were analyzed for longitudinal comparison. Outcomes included clinical infection, bacterial abundance, and relative microbiome composition. No patient in either group suffered a reconstructive failure or developed an infection. Triple antibiotic irrigation administered at the time of immediate TE reconstruction did not reduce bacterial abundance or impact microbial diversity relative to saline irrigation at the time of planned exchange. Implanted prosthetic material adopted the microbial composition of the surrounding host tissue. In cancer-naïve breasts, relative to saline, antibiotic irrigation increased bacterial abundance on periprosthetic capsules ( = 0.03) and acellular dermal matrices ( = 0.04) and altered the microbiota on both. These data show that, relative to saline only, the use of triple antibiotic irrigation in TE breast reconstruction does impact the bacterial abundance and diversity of certain biomaterials from cancer-naïve breasts. IMPORTANCE The lifetime risk of breast cancer is ~13% in women and is treated with a mastectomy in ~50% of cases. The majority are reconstructed, usually starting with a tissue expander to help restore the volume for a subsequent permanent breast implant or the women's own tissues. The biopsychosocial benefits of breast reconstruction, though, can be tempered by a high complication rate of at least 7% but over 30% in some women. Bacterial infection is the most common complication, and can lead to treatment delays, patient physical and emotional distress and escalating health care cost. To limit this risk, plastic surgeons have tried a variety of strategies to limit bacterial infection including irrigating the pocket created after removing the breast implant with antibiotic solutions, but good-quality data are scarce. Herein, we study the value of antibiotics in pocket irrigation using a robust randomized clinical trial design and molecular microbiology approaches.

摘要

细菌感染是使用组织扩张器(TE)进行分期乳房切除术后乳房重建最常见的并发症。为了限制细菌感染,尽管几乎没有高质量的数据支持这种做法,但手术部位的抗生素冲洗仍普遍进行。我们进行了一项前瞻性随机对照试验,以比较单纯生理盐水冲洗与三联抗生素冲洗方案(500毫升生理盐水中含1克头孢唑林、80毫克庆大霉素和50000单位杆菌肽)对乳房植入手术的影响。将患有癌症的乳房(n = 16)的微生物群与未患癌症的乳房(n = 16)的微生物群进行比较,因为所有患者(n = 16)均患有单侧癌症但接受了双侧乳房切除术(n = 32)。对乳房切除时以及数月后取出TE时获取的生物和假体标本进行分析,以进行纵向比较。结果包括临床感染、细菌丰度和相对微生物群组成。两组均无患者出现重建失败或感染。与计划更换时的生理盐水冲洗相比,即刻TE重建时给予的三联抗生素冲洗并未降低细菌丰度或影响微生物多样性。植入的假体材料采用了周围宿主组织的微生物组成。在未患癌症的乳房中,相对于生理盐水,抗生素冲洗增加了假体周围包膜(P = 0.03)和脱细胞真皮基质(P = 0.04)上的细菌丰度,并改变了两者上的微生物群。这些数据表明,相对于仅使用生理盐水,在TE乳房重建中使用三联抗生素冲洗确实会影响未患癌症乳房中某些生物材料的细菌丰度和多样性。重要性 女性患乳腺癌的终生风险约为13%,约50%的病例采用乳房切除术治疗。大多数患者会进行重建,通常从组织扩张器开始,以帮助恢复体积,以便后续植入永久性乳房假体或使用女性自身组织。然而,乳房重建的生物心理社会效益可能会因至少7%的高并发症发生率而受到影响,在某些女性中这一比例超过30%。细菌感染是最常见的并发症,可能导致治疗延迟、患者身体和情绪困扰以及医疗费用不断增加。为了降低这种风险,整形外科医生尝试了各种策略来限制细菌感染,包括用抗生素溶液冲洗乳房假体取出后形成的腔隙,但高质量的数据很少。在此,我们使用强大的随机临床试验设计和分子微生物学方法研究抗生素在腔隙冲洗中的价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70d5/10581127/e5a55ff152bf/spectrum.01430-23.f007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70d5/10581127/4f0dc01c69b8/spectrum.01430-23.f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70d5/10581127/37bf1f366a89/spectrum.01430-23.f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70d5/10581127/a67fe171d9ac/spectrum.01430-23.f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70d5/10581127/eab81577d89f/spectrum.01430-23.f004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70d5/10581127/c7655484de61/spectrum.01430-23.f005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70d5/10581127/3278f26b4397/spectrum.01430-23.f006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70d5/10581127/e5a55ff152bf/spectrum.01430-23.f007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70d5/10581127/4f0dc01c69b8/spectrum.01430-23.f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70d5/10581127/37bf1f366a89/spectrum.01430-23.f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70d5/10581127/a67fe171d9ac/spectrum.01430-23.f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70d5/10581127/eab81577d89f/spectrum.01430-23.f004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70d5/10581127/c7655484de61/spectrum.01430-23.f005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70d5/10581127/3278f26b4397/spectrum.01430-23.f006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70d5/10581127/e5a55ff152bf/spectrum.01430-23.f007.jpg

相似文献

1
A prospective randomized clinical trial to assess antibiotic pocket irrigation on tissue expander breast reconstruction.一项评估抗生素囊袋冲洗在组织扩张器乳房重建中应用效果的前瞻性随机临床试验。
Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Sep 27;11(5):e0143023. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01430-23.
2
Post-Mastectomy Surgical Pocket Irrigation With Triple Antibiotic Solution vs Chlorhexidine Gluconate: A Randomized Controlled Trial Assessing Surgical Site Infections in Immediate Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction.术后乳房切除术后手术口袋冲洗与三抗生素溶液与葡萄糖酸氯己定:评估即刻组织扩张器乳房重建中手术部位感染的随机对照试验。
Aesthet Surg J. 2021 Oct 15;41(11):NP1521-NP1528. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjab290.
3
Staphylococcus aureus Breast Implant Infection Isolates Display Recalcitrance To Antibiotic Pocket Irrigants.金黄色葡萄球菌乳房植入物感染分离株对抗生素口袋灌洗液表现出耐药性。
Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Feb 14;11(1):e0288422. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02884-22. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
4
Unilateral Tissue Expander/Implant Two-Stage Breast Reconstruction with the Assistance of Three-Dimensional Surface Imaging.三维表面成像辅助下的单侧组织扩张器/植入物二期乳房重建。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2020 Feb;44(1):60-69. doi: 10.1007/s00266-019-01513-3. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
5
Results from the ASPIRE study for breast reconstruction utilizing the AeroForm™ patient controlled carbon dioxide-inflated tissue expanders.ASPIRE研究中使用AeroForm™患者自控二氧化碳充气式组织扩张器进行乳房重建的结果。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2015 Sep;68(9):1255-61. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2015.05.001. Epub 2015 May 30.
6
Comparison of Breast Reconstruction Outcomes Using Oxychlorosene versus Triple Antibiotic Solution for Pocket Irrigation.使用洗必泰与三联抗生素溶液进行腔隙冲洗的乳房重建效果比较。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Aug 18;10(8):e3975. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003975. eCollection 2022 Aug.
7
Pharmacokinetics of Locally Applied Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.局部应用抗生素预防假体乳房重建的药代动力学。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Dec 1;6(12):e2348414. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.48414.
8
Pocket Irrigation and Technique During Reconstructive Surgery: An American Society of Plastic Surgery Survey of Current Practice.重建手术中的袖珍冲洗及技术:美国整形外科协会当前实践调查
Ann Plast Surg. 2019 Jun;82(6S Suppl 5):S427-S432. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001790.
9
Acellular Dermal Matrix in Immediate Expander/Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Multicenter Assessment of Risks and Benefits.即时扩张器/植入物乳房重建中脱细胞真皮基质的多中心风险与效益评估
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Dec;140(6):1091-1100. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003842.
10
Preoperative β-lactam antibiotic prophylaxis is superior to bacteriostatic alternatives in immediate expander-based breast reconstruction.术前β-内酰胺类抗生素预防用药在即刻扩张器乳房重建中优于抑菌性替代药物。
J Surg Oncol. 2021 Oct;124(5):722-730. doi: 10.1002/jso.26599. Epub 2021 Jul 8.

引用本文的文献

1
A Rebuttal of a Meta-analysis Supporting Breast Implant Pocket Antimicrobial Irrigation.对一项支持乳房植入腔隙抗菌冲洗的荟萃分析的反驳
Ann Plast Surg. 2025 Jul 1;95(1):1-4. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000004374. Epub 2025 Apr 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Staphylococcus aureus Breast Implant Infection Isolates Display Recalcitrance To Antibiotic Pocket Irrigants.金黄色葡萄球菌乳房植入物感染分离株对抗生素口袋灌洗液表现出耐药性。
Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Feb 14;11(1):e0288422. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02884-22. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
2
Individualized Risk Prediction Tool for Serious Wound Complications After Mastectomy With and Without Immediate Reconstruction.个体化风险预测工具在有和无即刻重建的乳房切除术后严重伤口并发症。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Nov;29(12):7751-7764. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-12110-1. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
3
The Macrotextured Implant Recall: Breast Implant-Associated-Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma Risk Aversion in Cosmetic and Reconstructive Plastic Surgery Practices.
大纹理乳房植入物召回:美容整形和重建整形手术中对乳房植入物相关间变性大细胞淋巴瘤的风险规避
Aesthet Surg J. 2022 Dec 14;42(12):1408-1413. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjac158.
4
Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction after Mastectomy, from the Subpectoral to the Prepectoral Approach: An Evidence-Based Change of Mind?乳房切除术后基于植入物的乳房重建:从胸大肌下途径到胸大肌前途径——观念基于证据的转变?
J Clin Med. 2022 May 30;11(11):3079. doi: 10.3390/jcm11113079.
5
Characterization of Host-Pathogen-Device Interactions in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection of Breast Implants.对假体乳房中铜绿假单胞菌感染的宿主-病原体-器械相互作用进行分析。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 Aug 1;150(2):260e-271e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009315. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
6
Efficacy of Povidone Iodine Against Microbial Biofilms in Breast Implants With Different Textures: Results From an Study.聚维酮碘对不同质地乳房植入物中微生物生物膜的疗效:一项研究的结果
Front Microbiol. 2022 Mar 29;13:868347. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.868347. eCollection 2022.
7
Breast and gut microbiome in health and cancer.健康与癌症中的乳腺和肠道微生物群
Genes Dis. 2020 Aug 20;8(5):581-589. doi: 10.1016/j.gendis.2020.08.002. eCollection 2021 Sep.
8
Acute Radiation Syndrome and the Microbiome: Impact and Review.急性放射综合征与微生物组:影响与综述
Front Pharmacol. 2021 May 18;12:643283. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.643283. eCollection 2021.
9
Microbial community compositions in breast implant biofilms associated with contracted capsules.与挛缩包膜相关的乳房植入物生物膜中的微生物群落组成。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 8;16(4):e0249261. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249261. eCollection 2021.
10
Human Microbiota and Breast Cancer-Is There Any Relevant Link?-A Literature Review and New Horizons Toward Personalised Medicine.人类微生物群与乳腺癌——是否存在相关联系?——文献综述及个性化医学的新视野
Front Microbiol. 2021 Feb 25;12:584332. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.584332. eCollection 2021.