Baughman Derek, Nasir Rafay, Ngo Lynda, Bazemore Andrew
<institution content-type="university">Center for Professionalism and Value in Health Care.
<institution content-type="university">Penn State College of Medicine</institution>, <addr-line>700 HMC Cres Road</addr-line>, <city>Hershey</city>, <state>PA</state> <postal-code>17033</postal-code>, <country>USA</country>.
J Prim Health Care. 2023 Sep;15(3):253-261. doi: 10.1071/HC23067.
Introduction The term comprehensiveness was introduced into the literature as early as the 1960s and is regarded as a core attribute of primary care. Although comprehensive care is a primary care research priority encompassing patient and provider experience, cost, and health outcomes, there has been a lack of focus on consolidating existing definitions. Aim To unify definitions of comprehensiveness in primary care. Methods The PRISMA extension for scoping reviews was followed, hierarchically filtering 'comprehensiveness' MeSH terms and literature-defined affiliated terms. Snowballing methods were used to include additional literature from known experts. Articles were systematically reviewed with a three-clinician team. Results The initial search populated 679 607 articles, of which 25 were included. Identified key terms include: whole-person care (WPC), range of services, and referral to specialty care. WPC is the extent which primary care physicians (PCPs) consider the physical, emotional, and social aspects of a patient's health. It has been shown to positively impact clinical costs and outcomes, satisfaction, and trust. Range of services encompasses most health problems to reduce unnecessary spending on specialty care and promote continuity. Referral to specialty care is utilized when PCPs cannot provide the necessary services - balancing depth and breadth of care with the limitations of primary care scope. Discussion This scoping review unified the interrelatedness of comprehensiveness's main aspects - whole-person care, range of services, and referral to specialty care - framing a working, evidence-based definition: managing most medical care needs and temporarily complementing care with special integrated services in the context of patient's values, preferences, and beliefs.
引言 “全面性” 这一术语早在20世纪60年代就被引入文献中,并被视为初级保健的核心属性。尽管全面护理是初级保健研究的重点,涵盖患者和提供者的体验、成本以及健康结果,但一直缺乏对整合现有定义的关注。目的 统一初级保健中全面性的定义。方法 遵循PRISMA扩展的范围综述方法,分层筛选 “全面性” 的医学主题词(MeSH)术语和文献定义的相关术语。采用滚雪球法纳入来自知名专家的其他文献。由三名临床医生组成的团队对文章进行系统综述。结果 初步检索得到679607篇文章,其中25篇被纳入。确定的关键术语包括:全人护理(WPC)、服务范围和转诊至专科护理。全人护理是指初级保健医生(PCP)考虑患者健康的身体、情感和社会方面的程度。已证明它对临床成本和结果、满意度以及信任有积极影响。服务范围涵盖大多数健康问题,以减少在专科护理上的不必要支出并促进连续性。当初级保健医生无法提供必要服务时,会使用转诊至专科护理 —— 在初级保健范围的限制下平衡护理的深度和广度。讨论 本范围综述统一了全面性主要方面的相互关联性 —— 全人护理、服务范围和转诊至专科护理,构建了一个基于证据的实用定义:在患者的价值观、偏好和信念背景下,管理大多数医疗护理需求并通过特殊综合服务临时补充护理。