Suppr超能文献

甲氨蝶呤联合英夫利昔单抗初始治疗小儿克罗恩病的疗效:一项初步研究。

Efficacy of Combined Initial Treatment of Methotrexate with Infliximab in Pediatric Crohn's Disease: A Pilot Study.

作者信息

Kim Yoon-Zi, Kang Ben, Kim Eun-Sil, Kwon Yiyoung, Choe Yon-Ho, Kim Mi-Jin

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea.

Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu 41944, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Biomedicines. 2023 Sep 19;11(9):2575. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11092575.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The combination of antitumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) agents with immunomodulators (IMMs) is a common treatment for pediatric Crohn's disease (CD). Although methotrexate (MTX) can be a first-line medication as an IMM, most clinicians in real-life practice, especially in South Korea, are more familiar with thiopurines. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and immunogenicity of MTX and azathioprine (AZA) as concurrent therapies for pediatric CD.

METHODS

In this pilot study, 29 newly diagnosed pediatric patients with moderate-to-severe CD were randomized to receive either MTX ( = 15) (15 mg/body surface area (BSA) per week) or oral AZA ( = 14) (0.5 mg/kg per day) in combination with Infliximab (IFX). The primary outcomes were the proportion of patients in endoscopic, biochemical, and transmural remission after 14 and 54 weeks of IFX therapy. The trough levels (TLs) of IFX and anti-drug antibody (ADA) levels were also compared.

RESULTS

Among the 29 patients, there were no significant differences in the biochemical ( = 1.0 at week 14, = 0.45 at week 54), endoscopic ( = 0.968 at week 14, = 0.05 at week 54), or transmural ( = 0.103 at week 54) remission rates between the two medications during the concurrent therapy. Additionally, the trends in the IFX trough and ADA levels over time during the treatments were similar for both medications, with no significant differences ( = 0.686, = 0.389, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The MTX showed comparable efficacy to the AZA in pediatric CD patients with moderate-to-severe disease. This effectively maintained adequate IFX levels and reduced ADA production. Therefore, although additional large-scale clinical trials are needed, this study demonstrated that either MTX or AZA can be selected as IMMs in the concurrent treatment of pediatric CD, depending on individual medical institutions' circumstances.

摘要

背景

抗肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)药物与免疫调节剂(IMM)联合使用是治疗儿童克罗恩病(CD)的常用方法。虽然甲氨蝶呤(MTX)作为一种免疫调节剂可以作为一线药物,但在实际临床实践中,大多数医生,尤其是在韩国,更熟悉硫嘌呤类药物。本研究旨在比较MTX和硫唑嘌呤(AZA)作为儿童CD联合治疗药物的疗效和免疫原性。

方法

在这项初步研究中,29例新诊断的中重度CD患儿被随机分为两组,分别接受MTX(n = 15)(每周15 mg/体表面积(BSA))或口服AZA(n = 14)(每天0.5 mg/kg)联合英夫利昔单抗(IFX)治疗。主要结局指标为IFX治疗14周和54周后达到内镜、生化和透壁缓解的患者比例。同时比较IFX的谷浓度(TL)和抗药抗体(ADA)水平。

结果

在这29例患者中,两种药物在联合治疗期间的生化缓解率(第14周时P = 1.0,第54周时P = 0.45)、内镜缓解率(第14周时P = 0.968,第54周时P = 0.05)或透壁缓解率(第54周时P = 0.103)均无显著差异。此外,两种药物在治疗期间IFX谷浓度和ADA水平随时间的变化趋势相似,无显著差异(分别为P = 0.686,P = 0.389)。

结论

在中重度儿童CD患者中,MTX与AZA疗效相当。这有效地维持了足够的IFX水平并减少了ADA的产生。因此,尽管还需要额外的大规模临床试验,但本研究表明,在儿童CD的联合治疗中,可根据各医疗机构的情况选择MTX或AZA作为免疫调节剂。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddd3/10526834/d405179e3b7c/biomedicines-11-02575-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验