Suppr超能文献

简短体能测试在急性心力衰竭住院患者中的临床特征及预后影响——PROFUND-IC注册研究结果

Clinical Characteristics and Prognostic Impact of Short Physical Performance Battery in Hospitalized Patients with Acute Heart Failure-Results of the PROFUND-IC Registry.

作者信息

López-García Lidia, Lorenzo-Villalba Noel, Molina-Puente Juan Igor, Kishta Aladin, Sanchez-Sauce Beatriz, Aguilar-Rodriguez Fernando, Bernanbeu-Wittel Máximo, Muñoz-Rivas Nuria, Soler-Rangel Llanos, Fernández-Carmena Luis, Andrès Emmanuel, Deodati Francesco, Trapiello-Valbuena Francisco, Casasnovas-Rodríguez Pilar, López-Reboiro Manuel Lorenzo, Méndez-Bailon Manuel

机构信息

Facultad de Enfermería, Universidad Complutense, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, 28040 Madrid, Spain.

Service de Médecine Interne, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, 67000 Strasbourg, France.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 14;12(18):5974. doi: 10.3390/jcm12185974.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Most patients diagnosed with heart failure (HF) are older adults with multiple comorbidities. Multipathological patients constitute a population with common characteristics: greater clinical complexity and vulnerability, frailty, mortality, functional deterioration, polypharmacy, and poorer health-related quality of life with more dependency.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the clinical characteristics of hospitalized patients with acute heart failure and to determine the prognosis of patients with acute heart failure according to the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) scale.

METHODS

Observational, prospective, and multicenter cohort study conducted from September 2020 to May 2022 in patients with acute heart failure as the main diagnosis and NT-ProBNP > 300 pg. The cohort included patients admitted to internal medicine departments in 18 hospitals in Spain. Epidemiological variables, comorbidities, cardiovascular risk factors, cardiovascular history, analytical parameters, and treatment during admission and discharge of the patients were collected. Level of frailty was assessed by the SPPB scale, and dependence, through the Barthel index. A descriptive analysis of all the variables was carried out, expressed as frequencies and percentages. A bivariate analysis of the SPPB was performed based on the score obtained (SPPB ≤ 5 and SPPB > 5). For the overall analysis of mortality, HF mortality, and readmission of patients at 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year, Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used, in which the survival experience among patients with an SPPB > 5 and SPPB ≤ 5 was compared.

RESULTS

A total of 482 patients were divided into two groups according to the SPPB with a cut-off point of an SPPB < 5. In the sample, 349 patients (77.7%) had an SPPB ≤ 5 and 100 patients (22.30%) had an SPPB > 5. Females (61%) predominated in the group with an SPPB ≤ 5 and males (61%) in those with an SPPB > 5. The mean age was higher in patients with an SPPB ≤ 5 (85.63 years). Anemia was more frequent in patients with an SPPB ≤ 5 (39.5%) than in patients with an SPPB ≥ 5 (29%). This was also seen with osteoarthritis (32.7%, = 0.000), diabetes (49.6%, = 0.001), and dyslipidemia (69.6%, = 0.011). Patients with an SPPB score > 5 had a Barthel index < 60 in only 4% ( = 4) of cases; the remainder of the patients (96%, = 96) had a Barthel index > 60. Patients with an SPPB > 5 showed a higher probability of survival at 30 days ( = 0.029), 6 months ( = 0.031), and 1 year ( = 0.007) with (OR = 7.07; 95%CI (1.60-29.80); OR: 3.9; 95%CI (1.30-11.60); OR: 6.01; 95%CI (1.90-18.30)), respectively. No statistically significant differences were obtained in the probability of readmission at 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year ( > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients admitted with acute heart failure showed a high frequency of frailty as assessed by the SPPB. Patients with an SPPB ≤ 5 had greater comorbidities and greater functional limitations than patients with an SPPB > 5. Patients with heart failure and a Barthel index > 60 frequently presented an SPPB < 5. In daily clinical practice, priority should be given to performing the SPPB in patients with a Barthel index > 60 to assess frailty. Patients with an SPPB ≤ 5 had a higher risk of mortality at 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year than patients with an SPPB ≤ 5. The SPPB is a valid tool for identifying frailty in acute heart failure patients and predicting 30-day, 6-month, and 1-year mortality.

摘要

背景

大多数被诊断为心力衰竭(HF)的患者是患有多种合并症的老年人。多病共存的患者构成了一个具有共同特征的群体:临床复杂性和脆弱性更高、身体虚弱、死亡率高、功能恶化、多重用药,以及与健康相关的生活质量较差且依赖性更强。

目的

评估急性心力衰竭住院患者的临床特征,并根据简短体能状况量表(SPPB)确定急性心力衰竭患者的预后。

方法

2020年9月至2022年5月对以急性心力衰竭为主要诊断且N末端B型利钠肽原(NT-ProBNP)>300 pg的患者进行了一项观察性、前瞻性、多中心队列研究。该队列包括西班牙18家医院内科收治的患者。收集了患者的流行病学变量、合并症、心血管危险因素、心血管病史、分析参数以及入院和出院期间的治疗情况。通过SPPB量表评估虚弱程度,通过Barthel指数评估依赖性。对所有变量进行描述性分析,以频率和百分比表示。根据获得的分数(SPPB≤5和SPPB>5)对SPPB进行双变量分析。对于患者30天、6个月和1年的死亡率、心力衰竭死亡率和再入院率的总体分析,使用Kaplan-Meier生存曲线,比较SPPB>5和SPPB≤5患者的生存经验。

结果

根据SPPB,以SPPB<5为界值,将482例患者分为两组。在样本中,349例患者(77.7%)的SPPB≤5,100例患者(22.30%)的SPPB>5。SPPB≤5组中女性占主导(61%),SPPB>5组中男性占主导(61%)。SPPB≤5的患者平均年龄较高(85.63岁)。SPPB≤5的患者贫血发生率(39.5%)高于SPPB≥5的患者(29%)。骨关节炎(32.7%,P = 0.000)、糖尿病(49.6%,P = 0.001)和血脂异常(69.6%,P = 0.011)的情况也是如此。SPPB评分>5的患者仅4%(n = 4)的Barthel指数<60;其余患者(96%,n = 96)的Barthel指数>60。SPPB>5的患者在30天(P = 0.029)、6个月(P = 0.031)和1年(P = 0.007)时的生存概率较高,相应的比值比(OR)分别为7.07;95%置信区间(CI)(1.60 - 29.80);OR:3.9;95%CI(1.30 - 11.60);OR:6.01;95%CI(1.90 - 18.30)。在30天、6个月和1年的再入院概率方面未获得统计学显著差异(P>0.05)。

结论

通过SPPB评估,急性心力衰竭入院患者的虚弱发生率较高。与SPPB>5的患者相比,SPPB≤5的患者合并症更多,功能受限更严重。心力衰竭且Barthel指数>60的患者经常出现SPPB<5。在日常临床实践中,对于Barthel指数>60的患者,应优先进行SPPB以评估虚弱程度。与SPPB>5的患者相比,SPPB≤5的患者在30天、6个月和1年时的死亡风险更高。SPPB是识别急性心力衰竭患者虚弱并预测30天、6个月和1年死亡率的有效工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbe4/10531733/4df20871a482/jcm-12-05974-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验