OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of esketamine combined with propofol on patient hemodynamics and its safety in hysteroscopy anesthesia. METHODS: A total of 186 hysteroscopic patients admitted to our hospital from January 2021 to January 2022 were selected, and the patients were divided into group K and Group P according to a completely random number table, with 93 cases each. In short, all patients are uniformly numbered and adequately intermixed, according to the prescribed sampling starting point and order, the sample unit numbers were successively drawn from the random number table, until the extraction to the required sample size. Group K was given esketamine combined with propofol intravenously, and group P was given sufentanil combined with propofol intravenously. The changes in respiratory circulation [heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and oxygen saturation (SpO2)] at the time of entering the operating room (T0), at the beginning of surgery (T1), 10 minutes after surgery(T2), and 10 minutes after the end of surgery (T3) were compared between the two groups, as well as the total time of surgery, the time to wake up after surgery, the amount of propofol used intraoperatively and the proportion of additional propofol were compared. The numerical rating scale (NRS) was used to assess the pain level of patients in both groups at different times after awakening and the occurrence of intraoperative and postoperative adverse reactions such as body movement, respiratory depression, bradycardia, injection site pain, nausea and vomiting, and dizziness were counted in both groups. RESULTS: There were no significant changes in MAP, HR, and SpO2 in Group K at all moments compared with T0 (P > .05), MAP, HR and SpO2 in Group P at T1 and T2 were lower than those at T0 (P < .05). MAP, HR, and SpO2 were significantly lower in Group P at T1 and T2 moments compared with Group K, suggesting that circulatory depression was more pronounced in Group P at T1 and T2 moments (P < .05) and was not conducive to postoperative recovery. Compared with group P, the postoperative recovery time of group K was significantly shorter, and the dosage of propofol and the proportion of additional propofol were significantly lower (P < .05) which was beneficial to the health of patients. The pain level was significantly lower in Group K at 5, 15, and 30 minutes after awakening than in Group P (P < .05). The incidence of adverse reactions such as intraoperative motion, respiratory depression, bradycardia, injection site pain, and dizziness was significantly lower in group K than in group P (P < .05), and there was no significant difference in the incidence of nausea and vomiting between the two groups (P > .05), and prove that esketamine combined with propofol used for anesthesia which have high safety as well as more effective. CONCLUSION: The use of esketamine compounded with propofol in hysteroscopy anesthesia has less effect on the patient's circulatory and respiratory systems. This protocol can improve the postoperative analgesic effect of anesthesia in patients, reduce the amount of propofol during surgery, have fewer adverse effects and mild symptoms, is safe and effective, and can be used in clinical practice.