Dai Christopher A, Fang Christopher J, Schwartz David, Enderson Jessica, McMann Ashley, Hyde Russel, Smith Nathan, Serfin Jennifer
Department of General Surgery, Good Samaritan Regional Medical Center, 3600 NW Samaritan Dr, Corvallis, OR 97330, USA.
Surg Res Pract. 2023 Sep 21;2023:2615557. doi: 10.1155/2023/2615557. eCollection 2023.
As health care shifts to a value-based model with a focus on patient outcomes per dollar spent, it is important to develop and evaluate standardized protocols that ultimately lead to improved patient outcomes and decreased hospital complications. Prior to our chest tube protocol, chest tube management at our Trauma Center was nonuniform and surgeon-specific. The aim of this study was to (1) develop an institutional standardized protocol for chest tube management at our Level II Trauma Center and (2) compare patient outcomes before and after the implementation of our protocol.
An institutional, standardized protocol was initiated at our Level II-Certified Trauma Center teaching hospital in 2014. An IRB-approved, single-institution retrospective chart review was performed between January 2011 and May 2017, in order to capture the 3 years prior and 3 years after protocol implementation. All patients with a diagnosis of hemothorax or pneumothorax (H/PTX) from blunt or penetrating trauma that resulted in a >24 French chest tube placement were included in the study. Patients were excluded if interventional radiology (IR) placed the chest tube, the mechanism was nontraumatic, or the patient expired at index hospitalization. Univariate analyses were performed to evaluate significant differences in patient outcomes before and after the implementation of the protocol.
A total of 143 patients were analyzed for this study, with 43 preprotocol patients and 100 postprotocol patients. Hospital length of stay (LOS), persistent H/PTX, and the need for further surgical intervention all improved after the implementation of the standardized protocol ( < 0.04).
Our standardized protocol for chest tube management at our Level II Trauma Center significantly improved patient outcomes and can serve as a model for similar institutions.
随着医疗保健转向以价值为基础的模式,重点关注每花费一美元所带来的患者治疗效果,制定并评估最终能改善患者治疗效果及减少医院并发症的标准化方案至关重要。在我们的胸管方案实施之前,我们创伤中心的胸管管理并不统一,且因外科医生而异。本研究的目的是:(1)为我们的二级创伤中心制定机构标准化胸管管理方案;(2)比较该方案实施前后的患者治疗效果。
2014年,我们在经二级认证的创伤中心教学医院启动了一项机构标准化方案。在2011年1月至2017年5月期间进行了一项经机构审查委员会批准的单机构回顾性病历审查,以获取方案实施前3年和实施后3年的数据。所有因钝性或穿透性创伤导致血胸或气胸(H/PTX)且放置了大于24法式胸管的患者均纳入本研究。如果胸管由介入放射科(IR)放置、致伤机制为非创伤性或患者在首次住院期间死亡,则将患者排除。进行单因素分析以评估方案实施前后患者治疗效果的显著差异。
本研究共分析了143例患者,其中方案实施前43例,方案实施后100例。实施标准化方案后,住院时间(LOS)、持续性H/PTX以及进一步手术干预的需求均有所改善(<0.04)。
我们二级创伤中心的胸管管理标准化方案显著改善了患者治疗效果,可作为类似机构的典范。