• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性与延迟全肘关节置换术治疗肱骨远端骨折后的疗效

Outcomes After Acute Versus Delayed Total Elbow Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Distal Humerus Fractures.

作者信息

Liu Christina, Zhang Dafang, Blazar Philip, Earp Brandon E

机构信息

Division of Hand and Upper-Extremity Surgery, Department of Orthopedics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston.

Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

出版信息

J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2023 Jun 4;5(5):612-619. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2023.05.006. eCollection 2023 Sep.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhsg.2023.05.006
PMID:37790826
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10543816/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Compare outcomes of acute versus delayed total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) following distal humerus fractures (DHF).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 39 patients who underwent primary TEA with semiconstrained implants for DHF, either within 4 weeks of their injury or after failing initial open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) or nonsurgical management, between June 1, 2003 and February 1, 2018 with minimum 1-year follow-up. Our outcome measures included DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand) score, complications, reoperations, and range of motion (ROM). Demographics, clinical variables, and outcomes were compared using the Student's -test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Fisher's exact test as appropriate. Kaplan-Meier curves for mortality, implant survivorship, and reoperation were created.

RESULTS

Our patients were categorized into acute TEA (n = 22), ORIF to TEA (n = 10), and nonsurgical to TEA (n = 7) treatment groups. Additional analysis was performed comparing acute to delayed TEA, which combined data from failed ORIF and nonsurgical cohorts. The median follow-up, average age, and median Charlson comorbility index were similar between groups. The most common fracture pattern was AO13C. At median follow-up of 5.8 years, DASH differed between cohorts: mean of 31 (SD 19) in acute TEA and 52 (SD 27) in delayed TEA, which further subdivided to 44.2 (SD 25) in failed ORIF and 76 (SD 23) in failed nonsurgical management. Poorer DASH scores at final follow-up were associated with delayed TEA, initial nonsurgical management, and depression. Surgical complications were associated with delayed TEA. Higher Charlson comorbidity index was associated with death. No variables were associated significantly with ROM, revision, or reoperation.

CONCLUSION

Comminuted DHFs are difficult to treat in the elderly with high rates of complication and poor function after surgery. Our study suggests TEA performed acutely result in satisfactory outcomes and should be a consideration for patients at high risk of failing ORIF or nonsurgical management.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

摘要

目的

比较肱骨远端骨折(DHF)后急性与延迟全肘关节置换术(TEA)的疗效。

方法

这项回顾性研究纳入了39例因DHF接受半限制型假体初次TEA的患者,这些患者在2003年6月1日至2018年2月1日期间受伤后4周内,或在初次切开复位内固定(ORIF)或非手术治疗失败后接受手术,且至少随访1年。我们的疗效指标包括上肢、肩部和手部功能障碍(DASH)评分、并发症、再次手术以及活动范围(ROM)。根据情况,使用学生t检验、曼-惠特尼U检验和费舍尔精确检验对人口统计学、临床变量和疗效进行比较。绘制了死亡率、假体生存率和再次手术的Kaplan-Meier曲线。

结果

我们的患者被分为急性TEA治疗组(n = 22)、ORIF转为TEA治疗组(n = 10)和非手术转为TEA治疗组(n = 7)。对急性与延迟TEA进行了额外分析,将ORIF失败和非手术队列的数据合并。各组之间的中位随访时间、平均年龄和中位查尔森合并症指数相似。最常见的骨折类型是AO13C。在中位随访5.8年时,各队列之间的DASH评分有所不同:急性TEA组的平均评分为31(标准差19),延迟TEA组为52(标准差27),其中ORIF失败组进一步细分为44.2(标准差25),非手术治疗失败组为76(标准差23)。最终随访时较差的DASH评分与延迟TEA、初始非手术治疗和抑郁有关。手术并发症与延迟TEA有关。较高的查尔森合并症指数与死亡有关。没有变量与ROM、翻修或再次手术有显著关联。

结论

粉碎性DHF在老年人中难以治疗,术后并发症发生率高且功能差。我们的研究表明,急性进行TEA可取得满意的疗效,对于有ORIF或非手术治疗失败高风险的患者应予以考虑。

研究类型/证据水平:治疗性研究,III级。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f01/10543816/d6c15946d1f7/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f01/10543816/7ed5600ec3b9/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f01/10543816/edc471f3ec57/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f01/10543816/7d06889bc50c/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f01/10543816/d6c15946d1f7/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f01/10543816/7ed5600ec3b9/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f01/10543816/edc471f3ec57/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f01/10543816/7d06889bc50c/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f01/10543816/d6c15946d1f7/gr4.jpg

相似文献

1
Outcomes After Acute Versus Delayed Total Elbow Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Distal Humerus Fractures.急性与延迟全肘关节置换术治疗肱骨远端骨折后的疗效
J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2023 Jun 4;5(5):612-619. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2023.05.006. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
A multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial of open reduction--internal fixation versus total elbow arthroplasty for displaced intra-articular distal humeral fractures in elderly patients.一项针对老年患者关节内移位肱骨远端骨折的切开复位内固定术与全肘关节置换术的多中心、前瞻性、随机对照试验。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009 Jan-Feb;18(1):3-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2008.06.005. Epub 2008 Sep 26.
3
Does timing of total elbow arthroplasty after distal humerus fracture affect 2-year complication rates?肱骨远端骨折后行全肘关节置换术的时机是否影响 2 年并发症发生率?
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Oct;33(10):2271-2278. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.05.010. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
4
Reoperation Risk After Total Elbow Arthroplasty Versus Open Reduction Internal Fixation for Distal Humerus Fractures in Elderly Patients.老年患者肱骨远端骨折行全肘关节置换术与切开复位内固定术后再手术风险比较。
J Orthop Trauma. 2020 Sep;34(9):503-509. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001767.
5
Comparison of functional outcomes of total elbow arthroplasty vs plate fixation for distal humerus fractures in osteoporotic elbows.骨质疏松性肘关节中,全肘关节置换术与肱骨远端骨折钢板固定术功能预后的比较。
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2011 Feb;40(2):67-71.
6
Total Elbow Arthroplasty for Distal Humerus Fractures Provided Similar Outcomes When Performed as a Primary Procedure or After Failed Internal Fixation.对于肱骨远端骨折,全肘关节置换术作为初次手术或内固定失败后进行时,疗效相似。
J Orthop Trauma. 2020 Feb;34(2):95-101. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001631.
7
Complex fractures of the distal humerus in the elderly: primary total elbow arthroplasty or open reduction and internal fixation? Mid-term follow-up.老年肱骨远端复杂骨折:初次全肘关节置换还是切开复位内固定?中期随访。
Int Orthop. 2021 Aug;45(8):2103-2110. doi: 10.1007/s00264-021-05027-z. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
8
Elbow hemiarthroplasty versus open reduction and internal fixation for AO/OTA type 13 C2 and C3 fractures of distal humerus in patients aged 50 years or above: a randomized controlled trial.50 岁及以上患者的肱骨远端 AO/OTA 13 C2 和 C3 型骨折:肘半关节成形术与切开复位内固定的随机对照试验。
Trials. 2020 Jun 8;21(1):497. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04418-8.
9
Comparison of open reduction and internal fixation with total elbow arthroplasty for intra-articular distal humeral fractures in older age: a retrospective study.老年肱骨远端关节内骨折切开复位内固定术与全肘关节置换术的比较:一项回顾性研究
Clin Shoulder Elb. 2020 May 26;23(2):94-99. doi: 10.5397/cise.2020.00052. eCollection 2020 Jun.
10
Is primary total elbow arthroplasty safe for the treatment of open intra-articular distal humerus fractures?一期全肘关节置换术治疗开放性关节内肱骨远端骨折是否安全?
Injury. 2014 Nov;45(11):1747-51. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.07.017. Epub 2014 Aug 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Management of distal humerus fractures.肱骨远端骨折的处理。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2020 Jul;30(5):745-762. doi: 10.1007/s00590-020-02626-1. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
2
Total Elbow Arthroplasty for Distal Humerus Fractures Provided Similar Outcomes When Performed as a Primary Procedure or After Failed Internal Fixation.对于肱骨远端骨折,全肘关节置换术作为初次手术或内固定失败后进行时,疗效相似。
J Orthop Trauma. 2020 Feb;34(2):95-101. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001631.
3
Long-term outcomes of total elbow arthroplasty for distal humeral fracture: results from a prior randomized clinical trial.
全肘关节置换治疗肱骨远端骨折的长期疗效:一项既往随机临床试验的结果。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Nov;28(11):2198-2204. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.06.004. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
4
The Association Between Symptoms of Depression and Office Visits in Patients With Nontraumatic Upper-Extremity Illness.非创伤性上肢疾病患者的抑郁症状与就诊次数之间的关联。
J Hand Surg Am. 2020 Feb;45(2):159.e1-159.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2019.03.019. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
5
Influence of psychological factors on patient-reported upper extremity disability.心理因素对上肢功能障碍患者报告的影响。
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2020 Jan;45(1):71-76. doi: 10.1177/1753193419859373. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
6
Total Elbow Arthroplasty.全肘关节置换术
J Hand Surg Am. 2019 Jun;44(6):487-495. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.11.005. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
7
Depression and Pain Interference Correlate With Physical Function in Patients Recovering From Hand Surgery.抑郁症和疼痛干扰与手部手术后康复患者的身体功能相关。
Hand (N Y). 2019 Nov;14(6):830-835. doi: 10.1177/1558944718777814. Epub 2018 May 28.
8
Trends in total elbow arthroplasty: a nationwide analysis in Germany from 2005 to 2014.全肘关节置换术的趋势:2005年至2014年德国的全国性分析。
Int Orthop. 2018 Apr;42(4):883-889. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-3818-x. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
9
A survivorship study of 838 total elbow replacements: a report from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 1994-2016.838 例全肘关节置换的生存研究:来自挪威关节置换登记处 1994-2016 年的报告。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Feb;27(2):260-269. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.10.018.
10
Distal Humerus Fractures in the Elderly Population.老年人群的肱骨远端骨折
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2017 Oct;25(10):673-683. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00683.