Kuc Alexander, Maksimenko Vladimir, Savosenkov Andrey, Grigorev Nikita, Grubov Vadim, Badarin Artem, Kazantsev Victor, Gordleeva Susanna, Hramov Alexander
Baltic Center for Neurotechnology and Artificial Intelligence, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Kaliningrad, Russia.
Center for Technologies in Robotics and Mechatronics Components, Innopolis University, Innopolis, Russia.
Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 19;14:1160605. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1160605. eCollection 2023.
When viewing a completely ambiguous image, different interpretations can switch involuntarily due to internal top-down processing. In the case of the Necker cube, an entirely ambiguous stimulus, observers often display a bias in perceptual switching between two interpretations based on their perspectives: one with a from-above perspective (FA) and the other with a from-below perspective (FB). Typically, observers exhibit a priori top-down bias in favor of the FA interpretation, which may stem from a statistical tendency in everyday life where we more frequently observe objects from above. However, it remains unclear whether this perceptual bias persists when individuals voluntarily decide on the Necker cube's interpretation in goal-directed behavior, and the impact of ambiguity in this context is not well-understood. In our study, we instructed observers to voluntarily identify the orientation of a Necker cube while manipulating its ambiguity from low (LA) to high (HA). Our investigation aimed to test two hypotheses: (i) whether the perspective (FA or FB) would result in a bias in response time, and (ii) whether this bias would depend on the level of stimulus ambiguity. Additionally, we analyzed electroencephalogram (EEG) signals to identify potential biomarkers that could explain the observed perceptual bias. The behavioral results confirmed a perceptual bias in favor of the from-above perspective, as indicated by shorter response times. However, this bias diminished for stimuli with high ambiguity. For the LA stimuli, the occipital theta-band power consistently exceeded the frontal theta-band power throughout most of the decision-making time. In contrast, for the HA stimuli, the frontal theta-band power started to exceed the occipital theta-band power during the 0.3-s period preceding the decision. We propose that occipital theta-band power reflects evidence accumulation, while frontal theta-band power reflects its evaluation and decision-making processes. For the FB perspective, occipital theta-band power exhibited higher values and dominated over a longer duration, leading to an overall increase in response time. These results suggest that more information and more time are needed to encode stimuli with a FB perspective, as this template is less common for the observers compared to the template for a cube with a FA perspective.
当观察一个完全模糊的图像时,由于内部的自上而下的处理过程,不同的解释会不由自主地切换。以内克尔立方体为例,这是一个完全模糊的刺激物,观察者在基于他们的视角对两种解释进行感知切换时,往往会表现出一种偏向:一种是从上往下的视角(FA),另一种是从下往上的视角(FB)。通常情况下,观察者表现出先验的自上而下的偏向,倾向于FA解释,这可能源于日常生活中的一种统计趋势,即我们更频繁地从上方观察物体。然而,当个体在目标导向行为中自愿决定内克尔立方体的解释时,这种感知偏向是否持续,以及在这种情况下模糊性的影响尚未得到很好的理解。在我们的研究中,我们指示观察者在将内克尔立方体的模糊性从低(LA)调整到高(HA)的同时,自愿识别其方向。我们的研究旨在检验两个假设:(i)视角(FA或FB)是否会导致反应时间上的偏向,以及(ii)这种偏向是否取决于刺激模糊性的程度。此外,我们分析了脑电图(EEG)信号,以识别可能解释观察到的感知偏向的潜在生物标志物。行为结果证实了对从上往下视角的感知偏向,表现为较短的反应时间。然而,对于高模糊性的刺激,这种偏向减弱。对于LA刺激,在大多数决策时间内,枕叶θ波段功率始终超过额叶θ波段功率。相比之下,对于HA刺激,在决策前的0.3秒期间,额叶θ波段功率开始超过枕叶θ波段功率。我们提出,枕叶θ波段功率反映证据积累,而额叶θ波段功率反映其评估和决策过程。对于FB视角,枕叶θ波段功率表现出更高的值,并在更长的持续时间内占主导地位,导致反应时间总体增加。这些结果表明,用FB视角编码刺激需要更多的信息和更多的时间,因为与FA视角的立方体模板相比,这个模板对观察者来说不太常见。