Suppr超能文献

内镜下结石成分鉴定:激光碎石术中结石外观是否能提高准确性?

Endoscopic Stone Composition Identification: Is Accuracy Improved by Stone Appearance During Laser Lithotripsy?

机构信息

Cleveland Clinic Glickman Urological & Kidney Institute, Cleveland, OH.

Cleveland Clinic Glickman Urological & Kidney Institute, Cleveland, OH.

出版信息

Urology. 2023 Dec;182:67-72. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.09.025. Epub 2023 Oct 5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate if videos during laser lithotripsy increase accuracy and confidence of stone identification by urologists compared to still pictures.

METHODS

We obtained representative pictures and videos of 4 major stone types from 8 different patients during ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy. A REDCap survey was created and emailed to members of the Endourological Society. The survey included a picture followed by the corresponding video of each stone undergoing laser lithotripsy and additional clinical information. Each picture and video included multiple-choice questions about stone composition and response confidence level. Accuracy, confidence levels, and rates of rectification (change from incorrect to correct answer) or confounding (correct to incorrect) after watching videos were analyzed.

RESULTS

One hundred eighty-seven urologists responded to the survey. The accuracy rate of stone identification with pictures was 43.8% vs 46.1% with videos (P = .27). Accuracy for individual stones was low and highly variable. Video only improved accuracy for 1 cystine stone. After viewing videos, participants were more likely to rectify vs confound their answers. Urologists were more likely to be confident with videos than pictures alone (65.4% vs 53.7%, respectively; P <.001); however, confident answers were not more likely to yield accurate predictions with videos vs still pictures.

CONCLUSION

Stone identification by urologists is marginally improved with videos vs pictures alone. Overall, accuracy in stone identification is low irrespective of confidence level, picture, and lithotripsy video visualization. Urologists should be cautious in using endoscopic stone appearance to direct metabolic management.

摘要

目的

评估与静态图像相比,激光碎石术中的视频是否能提高泌尿科医生对结石识别的准确性和信心。

方法

我们从 8 名不同患者的输尿管镜钬激光碎石术中获得了 4 种主要结石类型的有代表性的图片和视频。创建了一个 REDCap 调查,并通过电子邮件发送给内镜学会的成员。该调查包括一张图片,随后是对每种进行激光碎石术的结石的相应视频,以及其他临床信息。每张图片和视频都包含关于结石成分和置信水平的多项选择题。分析了观看视频后的准确性、置信度水平以及纠正(从错误答案变为正确答案)或混淆(正确答案变为错误答案)的比率。

结果

187 名泌尿科医生对该调查做出了回应。使用图片的结石识别准确率为 43.8%,而使用视频的准确率为 46.1%(P=0.27)。单个结石的准确率较低且差异较大。视频仅提高了 1 例胱氨酸结石的准确率。观看视频后,参与者更有可能纠正而不是混淆他们的答案。与仅看图片相比,泌尿科医生观看视频后更有可能有信心(分别为 65.4%和 53.7%;P<.001);然而,观看视频并不能比看图片更有可能做出准确的预测。

结论

与单独使用图片相比,泌尿科医生使用视频可略微提高结石识别的准确性。总体而言,无论信心水平、图片和碎石术视频可视化如何,结石识别的准确性都很低。泌尿科医生在使用内镜下结石外观来指导代谢管理时应谨慎。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验