INTRODUCTION

There is no standard treatment strategy for rectosigmoid cancer because of the diverse definitions of the proximal rectal origin. This study aimed to evaluate sigmoid take-off compared with other landmarks of the rectosigmoid junction in guiding oncological therapy and outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective, comparative cohort study included patients diagnosed with rectosigmoid carcinoma at our centre between January 2010 and December 2018. The patients were classified into the neoadjuvant treatment group and upfront surgery group. The oncological outcomes were compared between the two groups in relation to the tumor position.

RESULTS

A total of 656 patients (median age 64 years) were included. After propensity score matching, the 3- and 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival in patients in both the groups were comparable. However, when only patients with rectal cancer as defined by the sigmoid take-off point were included, the disease-free survival rate in the upfront surgery group was significantly lower than that in the neoadjuvant treatment group (p = 0.03 in patients who underwent computed tomography, p = 0.03 in patients who underwent magnetic resonance imaging). The turning point of the beneficial hazard ratio of neoadjuvant therapy was compared according to the different definitions of the rectosigmoid junction and the sigmoid take-off was found to be the most effective.

CONCLUSION

The sigmoid take-off point is a suitable landmark for identifying the rectosigmoid junction and is an important defining criterion for assessing the benefit of neoadjuvant therapy. The application of this definition in clinical practice and future trials is warranted.