University of Wisconsin-Madison; Madison, WI, USA.
Stud Hist Philos Sci. 2023 Dec;102:31-44. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2023.09.004. Epub 2023 Oct 7.
Using past episodes of climate change as a source of evidence to inform our projections about contemporary climate change requires establishing the extent to which episodes in the deep past are analogous to the current crisis. However, many scientists claim that contemporary rates of climate change (e.g., rates of carbon emissions or temperature change) are unprecedented, including compared to episodes in the deep past. If so, this would limit the utility of paleoclimate analogues. In this paper, I show how a data adjustment procedure called "temporal scaling," which must be applied to both contemporary and past rate data, complicates the claim that contemporary rates are truly unprecedented. On top of giving actionable recommendations to scientists, this paper advances the philosophical literature concerning the use of models that are known to be somewhat disanalogous to their target systems.
利用过去气候变化的事件作为证据来预测当前的气候变化,需要确定过去的事件在多大程度上与当前的危机类似。然而,许多科学家声称,当前的气候变化速度(例如,碳排放或温度变化的速度)是前所未有的,甚至与过去的事件相比也是如此。如果是这样,这将限制古气候类似物的实用性。在本文中,我展示了一种称为“时间缩放”的数据调整程序,该程序必须应用于当前和过去的速率数据,这使得声称当前的速率确实是前所未有的说法变得复杂。除了为科学家提供可行的建议外,本文还推进了关于使用与目标系统有些不同的模型的哲学文献。