• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

隆鼻手术与YouTube:一项评估隆鼻手术视频质量、可信度和可靠性的横断面研究。

Rhinoplasty and YouTube: A Cross-Sectional Study to Assess the Quality, Dependability, and Reliability of Videos on Rhinoplasty.

作者信息

Djahanshahi Nadia, Patel Keval B, Popoola-Samuel Helen A O, Fayyaz Faris, R Akash

机构信息

Surgery, Saint George University, True Blue, GRD.

Surgery, Narendra Modi Medical College, Ahmedabad, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2023 Sep 6;15(9):e44804. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44804. eCollection 2023 Sep.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.44804
PMID:37809268
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10558892/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Rhinoplasty, also referred to as a nose job or a reconstruction of the nose, is a surgical procedure that alters and reconstructs the nose for aesthetic or functional purposes. With the emergence of social media and modern internet accessibility, YouTube has gained popularity among users of all ages. Despite this, the accuracy and credibility of these videos and the information they include could be cause for concern.

AIMS

This study intends to assess the competence, quality, and dependability of the information in the videos related to "Rhinoplasty surgery" on YouTube.

METHODOLOGY

This is a cross-sectional observational study that analyzes rhinoplasty information on YouTube. A Google Forms questionnaire was used to collect the data. The Global Quality Score (GQS), reliability score, and Video Power Index (VPI) were used to assess quality and reliability, and statistical analysis was performed using IBM Corp. Released 2012. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp. The inclusion criteria were videos ranging from 1 minute to 20 minutes in duration, pertinent to the topic of rhinoplasty surgery, and in either English or Hindi.

RESULTS

A total of 71 videos were analyzed, and 70 videos were included. A comparison of GQS, reliability score, and VPI based on the type of uploader was done by the Kruskal-Wallis test. The association between VPI, GQS, and reliability score with that of the uploader of the video was found to be statistically insignificant (p<0.05). Videos uploaded by healthcare organizations, news outlets, patients, or other relevant groups have the most GQS (4.5), whereas videos uploaded by hospitals have the lowest.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to the type of uploader, videos have no statistically significant changes in quality, reliability, or video power, implying that the type of uploader does not necessarily impact the overall quality or reliability of the information presented in the investigated YouTube videos. While the majority of the videos addressed the indications of rhinoplasty and provided information about the etiology, there were gaps in discussing pre-procedural investigations and preventive measures. Due to our limitations, expanding the number of accounts used for search and increasing the number of videos might overcome the search algorithm.

摘要

引言

隆鼻术,也被称为鼻部整形或鼻再造,是一种出于美学或功能目的改变和重塑鼻子的外科手术。随着社交媒体的出现和现代互联网的普及,YouTube在各年龄段用户中都颇受欢迎。尽管如此,这些视频及其所含信息的准确性和可信度可能令人担忧。

目的

本研究旨在评估YouTube上与“隆鼻手术”相关视频中信息的专业性、质量和可靠性。

方法

这是一项横断面观察性研究,分析YouTube上的隆鼻信息。使用谷歌表单问卷收集数据。全球质量评分(GQS)、可靠性评分和视频影响力指数(VPI)用于评估质量和可靠性,并使用IBM公司2012年发布的IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows 21.0版软件进行统计分析。纽约州阿蒙克市:IBM公司。纳入标准为时长在1分钟至20分钟之间、与隆鼻手术主题相关且为英语或印地语的视频。

结果

共分析了71个视频,纳入70个。通过Kruskal - Wallis检验对基于上传者类型的GQS、可靠性评分和VPI进行了比较。发现视频的VPI、GQS和可靠性评分与视频上传者之间的关联无统计学意义(p<0.05)。由医疗保健组织、新闻机构、患者或其他相关团体上传的视频GQS最高(4.5),而由医院上传的视频GQS最低。

结论

与上传者类型相比,视频在质量、可靠性或视频影响力方面无统计学显著变化,这意味着上传者类型不一定会影响所调查的YouTube视频中呈现信息的整体质量或可靠性。虽然大多数视频涉及隆鼻的适应症并提供了病因信息,但在讨论术前检查和预防措施方面存在差距。由于我们的局限性,增加用于搜索的账户数量和视频数量可能会克服搜索算法的问题。

相似文献

1
Rhinoplasty and YouTube: A Cross-Sectional Study to Assess the Quality, Dependability, and Reliability of Videos on Rhinoplasty.隆鼻手术与YouTube:一项评估隆鼻手术视频质量、可信度和可靠性的横断面研究。
Cureus. 2023 Sep 6;15(9):e44804. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44804. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
YouTube as a Patient Information Source for Tendon Repair Surgery.YouTube作为肌腱修复手术的患者信息来源。
Cureus. 2023 Aug 21;15(8):e43890. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43890. eCollection 2023 Aug.
3
Assessment of the Quality and Reliability of Information on YouTube Regarding Angiography and Angioplasty.YouTube上关于血管造影术和血管成形术信息的质量与可靠性评估
Cureus. 2023 Sep 25;15(9):e45885. doi: 10.7759/cureus.45885. eCollection 2023 Sep.
4
YouTube as a Patient Information Source for Gastrointestinal Reflux Disease.YouTube作为胃食管反流病的患者信息来源
Cureus. 2023 Nov 20;15(11):e49118. doi: 10.7759/cureus.49118. eCollection 2023 Nov.
5
An Objective Comparison of the Quality and Reliability of Information Regarding Autism Spectrum Disorder on YouTube.YouTube上关于自闭症谱系障碍信息的质量与可靠性的客观比较
Cureus. 2024 May 23;16(5):e60904. doi: 10.7759/cureus.60904. eCollection 2024 May.
6
A Comparison of Quality and Reliability of YouTube Videos About the MRI Technique and Its Various Aspects.关于MRI技术及其各个方面的YouTube视频的质量与可靠性比较
Cureus. 2024 Jul 3;16(7):e63769. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63769. eCollection 2024 Jul.
7
Study on the Quality, Relevance, and Comparability of YouTube Videos Expressing Stroke and Its Consequences From Various Sources.来自不同来源的表达中风及其后果的YouTube视频的质量、相关性和可比性研究。
Cureus. 2023 Aug 10;15(8):e43277. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43277. eCollection 2023 Aug.
8
Quality and Reliability of YouTube Videos on Myocardial Infarction: A Cross-Sectional Study.YouTube上关于心肌梗死视频的质量与可靠性:一项横断面研究。
Cureus. 2023 Aug 10;15(8):e43268. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43268. eCollection 2023 Aug.
9
Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS): A Cross-Sectional Observational Study Analyzing the Quality of Content on YouTube.多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS):一项分析YouTube上内容质量的横断面观察性研究
Cureus. 2023 Sep 16;15(9):e45354. doi: 10.7759/cureus.45354. eCollection 2023 Sep.
10
Diabetes Mellitus on YouTube: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study to Assess the Quality and Reliability of Videos.YouTube上的糖尿病:一项评估视频质量和可靠性的横断面观察性研究。
Cureus. 2023 Aug 18;15(8):e43704. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43704. eCollection 2023 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating YouTube as a Source of Education for Patients Undergoing Surgery: A Systematic Review.评估 YouTube 作为手术患者教育资源的效果:一项系统综述。
Ann Surg. 2023 Oct 1;278(4):e712-e718. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005892. Epub 2023 May 5.
2
Evaluation of the Reliability and Quality of YouTube Video Content about Perianal Fistulas.评价关于肛周瘘的 YouTube 视频内容的可靠性和质量。
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Nov 16;2022:2955273. doi: 10.1155/2022/2955273. eCollection 2022.
3
YouTube as a source of information on pediatric scoliosis: a reliability and educational quality analysis.YouTube 作为小儿脊柱侧凸信息来源的可靠性和教育质量分析。
Spine Deform. 2023 Jan;11(1):3-9. doi: 10.1007/s43390-022-00569-7. Epub 2022 Aug 20.
4
Quality and reliability evaluation of online videos on carpal tunnel syndrome: a YouTube video-based study.基于YouTube视频的腕管综合征在线视频质量与可靠性评估研究
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 15;12(4):e059239. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059239.
5
A quality assessment of YouTube content on shoulder instability.YouTube 上关于肩关节不稳定的内容质量评估。
Phys Sportsmed. 2022 Aug;50(4):289-294. doi: 10.1080/00913847.2021.1942286. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
6
Secondary Rhinoplasty for Unilateral Cleft Nasal Deformity.二期修复术治疗单侧唇裂鼻畸形。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 Jul 1;148(1):133-143. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008124.
7
A Practical Classification System for Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty Techniques.一种用于鼻背维持整形术技术的实用分类系统。
Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2021 May-Jun;23(3):153-155. doi: 10.1089/fpsam.2021.0030. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
8
Evidence-Based Performance Measures for Rhinoplasty: A Multidisciplinary Performance Measure Set.基于证据的隆鼻术绩效评估指标:多学科绩效评估指标集。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 Feb 1;147(2):222e-230e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007598.
9
Current Practice and Perceptions Regarding Cost Communication in Breast Cancer Reconstruction: Survey Results of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.当前乳腺癌重建中成本沟通的实践和认知:美国整形外科学会的调查结果。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Jan;28(1):376-385. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08750-w. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
10
Post-rhinoplasty outcomes in an Indian population assessed using the FACE-Q appraisal scales: a prospective observational study.使用FACE-Q评估量表对印度人群鼻整形术后效果的评估:一项前瞻性观察研究。
J Laryngol Otol. 2020 Mar;134(3):247-251. doi: 10.1017/S0022215120000638.