Harford Philip, Tran Liem, Pollock Danielle, Thiruvenkatarajan Venkatesan, Munn Zachary
JBI, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Health Evidence Synthesis Recommendations and Impact (HESRI), School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
JBI Evid Synth. 2024 Apr 1;22(4):706-712. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-23-00168.
This systematic review will investigate the effectiveness of the ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block as an analgesic technique for patients with rib fractures compared with all other standard management techniques. Comparisons will be made with both nerve blocks (neuraxial techniques and peripheral nerve blocks) and systemic treatment (with patient-controlled analgesia and/or per required need analgesia for breakthrough pain).
Erector spinae plane block is a well-established rescue analgesia option for patients with rib fractures. The use of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block in clinical practice has been largely based on observational data, with recent randomized controlled trials examining it against several other options for analgesic management. This review will compare the erector spinae against all other management techniques used in practice for rib fractures to determine whether this is the most effective analgesic technique.
The review will include all randomized controlled and pseudo-randomized controlled trials examining ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for the analgesic management of traumatic rib fractures. All other study designs will be excluded.
MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR), ClinicalTrials.gov, and the ISRCTN registry will be searched to identify all relevant ongoing clinical trials. Study selection, critical appraisal, and data extraction will be performed by 2 independent reviewers. Data will be extracted into software for statistical analysis (including meta-analysis where possible).
PROSPERO CRD42023414849.
本系统评价将研究超声引导下竖脊肌平面阻滞作为肋骨骨折患者镇痛技术相对于所有其他标准管理技术的有效性。将与神经阻滞(神经轴技术和外周神经阻滞)和全身治疗(患者自控镇痛和/或按需给予突破性疼痛镇痛)进行比较。
竖脊肌平面阻滞是肋骨骨折患者成熟的挽救性镇痛选择。超声引导下竖脊肌平面阻滞在临床实践中的应用很大程度上基于观察性数据,最近有随机对照试验将其与其他几种镇痛管理选择进行了比较。本评价将竖脊肌平面阻滞与实践中用于肋骨骨折的所有其他管理技术进行比较,以确定这是否是最有效的镇痛技术。
本评价将纳入所有检查超声引导下竖脊肌平面阻滞用于创伤性肋骨骨折镇痛管理的随机对照试验和半随机对照试验。将排除所有其他研究设计。
将检索MEDLINE(PubMed)、Embase(Ovid)、CINAHL(EBSCOhost)、Cochrane对照试验中央登记册、澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册库(ANZCTR)、ClinicalTrials.gov以及ISRCTN注册库,以识别所有相关的正在进行的临床试验。研究选择、批判性评价和数据提取将由2名独立的评审员进行。数据将被提取到软件中进行统计分析(如有可能包括荟萃分析)。
PROSPERO CRD42023414849。