Suppr超能文献

在冲洗和用蒸馏水搅拌之间进行操作是否可以防止次氯酸钠和洗必泰根管冲洗剂之间的相互作用形成沉淀?

Did in-between rinsing and agitating with distilled water prevents precipitate formation by the interaction between sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine canal irrigants?

机构信息

Postgraduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil.

Department of Diagnosis & Oral Health, Division of Endodontics, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.

出版信息

Microsc Res Tech. 2024 Feb;87(2):315-325. doi: 10.1002/jemt.24435. Epub 2023 Oct 9.

Abstract

The interaction of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX) produces an orange-brown precipitate. The present study evaluated the influence of distilled water (H O) in different irrigation protocols designed to prevent the formation of precipitate with NaOCl and CHX. Fifty canine teeth were instrumented and split longitudinally. The canal was examined with a stereomicroscope and photographed by canal-thirds. The tooth halves were repositioned and distributed randomly into five groups, according to the final irrigation protocol (n = 10): G1 (control)-Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) + NaOCl + CHX, conventional irrigation (CI); G2-EDTA + NaOCl + CHX, activated with passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI); G3-EDTA (PUI) + NaOCl (PUI) + H O (CI) + CHX (PUI); G4-EDTA + NaOCl + H O + CHX (PUI); G5-EDTA (PUI) + NaOCl (PUI) + H O (continuous ultrasonic irrigation [CUI]) + CHX (PUI). The specimens were evaluated with a stereomicroscope and scanning electron microscope (SEM). Energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy analysis was performed to identify the elemental profile of the irrigated canal walls. The images were scored according to the extensiveness of precipitate. Data were analyzed (Kruskal-Wallis test, α = 5%). Under the stereomicroscope, G1 had significantly higher scores than all the other groups in all canal-thirds (p < .05). All four experimental groups showed similar scores (p > .05). There were no significant differences in precipitate formation among root-thirds in intragroup analysis (p > .05). Upon SEM examination, overall, only G5 had lower scores than G1 (p < .05). Analysis by canal-thirds showed no significant difference among groups and among canal-thirds in the intragroup analysis (p > .05). G1 showed high Cl peaks. In-between irrigation with H O activated by CUI is effective in preventing precipitate formation during canal debridement with NaOCl and CHX. RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS: Continuous ultrasonic irrigation with distilled water was capable to prevent the precipitate formation. The precipitate can be classified as a chemical smear layer.

摘要

次氯酸钠(NaOCl)与葡萄糖酸氯己定(CHX)相互作用会产生橙棕色沉淀物。本研究评估了蒸馏水(H2O)在不同冲洗方案中的影响,这些方案旨在防止 NaOCl 和 CHX 形成沉淀。将 50 颗犬牙进行器械处理并纵向劈开。使用立体显微镜检查并通过根管三分法拍照。将牙半部分重新定位并随机分配到五个组中,根据最终冲洗方案(n=10):G1(对照)-乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)+NaOCl+CHX,常规冲洗(CI);G2-EDTA+NaOCl+CHX,用被动超声冲洗(PUI)激活;G3-EDTA(PUI)+NaOCl(PUI)+H2O(CI)+CHX(PUI);G4-EDTA+NaOCl+H2O+CHX(PUI);G5-EDTA(PUI)+NaOCl(PUI)+H2O(连续超声冲洗[CUI])+CHX(PUI)。使用立体显微镜和扫描电子显微镜(SEM)评估标本。进行能谱分析(EDS)以鉴定冲洗后根管壁的元素轮廓。根据沉淀物的广泛程度对图像进行评分。数据进行分析(Kruskal-Wallis 检验,α=5%)。在立体显微镜下,G1 在所有根管三分部的评分均显著高于其他所有组(p<0.05)。所有四个实验组的评分相似(p>0.05)。组内分析中,在根三分部之间,沉淀形成无显著差异(p>0.05)。在 SEM 检查下,总体而言,只有 G5 的评分低于 G1(p<0.05)。根管三分部分析显示,组间和组内根管三分部之间无显著差异(p>0.05)。G1 显示出较高的 Cl 峰。在用 CUI 激活的 H2O 冲洗之间,可以有效防止在使用 NaOCl 和 CHX 进行根管清创时形成沉淀。研究亮点:用蒸馏水进行连续超声冲洗能够防止沉淀形成。沉淀可被归类为化学玷污层。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验