Suppr超能文献

人工饲养大象运动健康评估标准化系统的开发与评估

DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF A STANDARDIZED SYSTEM FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF LOCOMOTOR HEALTH IN ELEPHANTS UNDER HUMAN CARE.

作者信息

Turner Abigail, Masters Nic, Pfau Thilo, Hutchinson John R, Weller Renate

机构信息

Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, AL9 7TA, United Kingdom,

Veterinary Department, ZSL Whipsnade Zoo, Dunstable, Bedfordshire, LU6 2LF, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Zoo Wildl Med. 2023 Oct;54(3):529-537. doi: 10.1638/2022-0110.

Abstract

Although lameness is a common problem in elephants (Asian elephant [] and African elephants and ) under human care, there has not been a standardized lameness assessment system to date. This study developed and evaluated a standardized system for the assessment of locomotion in elephants under human care regardless of husbandry system. In total, 72 elephants out of a possible 73 in the United Kingdom and Ireland were filmed from behind, from in front, and from both sides. Using a questionnaire and a select panel of elephant specialists, a zoo veterinarian, and a locomotion expert, a numerical rating scoring (NRS) system was proposed. Locomotion was scored on a 4-point scale with numerical values 0-4 corresponding to specific criteria as follows: 0 = clinically sound, 1 = stiffness, 2 = abnormal tracking, and 4 = reluctance to bear weight. The intra- and interobserver repeatability of five veterinary surgeons using this system was determined and compared with a visual analog scale (VAS) expressed as a 100-mm line. Overall intraobserver reliability was moderate (Cohen's kappa [κ] = 0.676) and interobserver reliability was fair (κ = 0.37) for the presence of lameness. Interobserver agreement improved from the first scoring to second scoring from slight agreement to fair agreement for stiffness and reluctance to bear weight. Abnormal tracking had moderate intraobserver agreement for both scoring sessions. There were wide widths of agreement for the VAS interobserver (67 mm); however, they were narrower for the intraobserver (33 mm). The developed NRS can be used on freely moving elephants to evaluate elephant locomotion, regardless of husbandry methods, and has been shown to be more reliable than a VAS.

摘要

尽管在人工饲养条件下,跛足是大象(亚洲象[]和非洲象以及)常见的问题,但迄今为止尚未有标准化的跛足评估系统。本研究开发并评估了一种用于评估人工饲养大象运动能力的标准化系统,该系统适用于任何饲养方式。在英国和爱尔兰,总共73头大象中有72头从后方、前方和两侧进行了拍摄。通过问卷调查以及由大象专家、动物园兽医和运动专家组成的选定小组,提出了一种数字评分(NRS)系统。运动能力按4分制评分,数值0 - 4对应以下特定标准:0 = 临床健康,1 = 僵硬,2 = 异常步态,4 = 不愿负重。确定了五名兽医使用该系统的观察者内和观察者间的重复性,并与表示为100毫米线的视觉模拟量表(VAS)进行比较。对于跛足的存在,总体观察者内可靠性为中等(科恩kappa系数[κ] = 0.676),观察者间可靠性为一般(κ = 0.37)。对于僵硬和不愿负重的情况,观察者间一致性从第一次评分到第二次评分有所改善,从轻微一致变为一般一致。在两个评分阶段,异常步态的观察者内一致性为中等。VAS观察者间的一致性范围较宽(67毫米);然而,观察者内的一致性范围较窄(33毫米)。所开发的NRS可用于自由活动的大象,以评估大象的运动能力,无论饲养方法如何,并且已被证明比VAS更可靠。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验